nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry

The UK follows Japan in determining extent of nuclear “Transparency” by extending secrecy and protecting corruption!

OFFICIAL

OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE

SECRET

TOP-SECRET

Screenshot from 2014-01-16 01:57:46

http://www.sellafieldsites.com/2014/03/new-government-security-classifications/

New Government Security Classifications

In 2012 Francis Maude, Minister for the Cabinet Office, announced the intention to fundamentally overhaul and replace the existing information classification and marking scheme as part of the government’s Civil Service Reform programme.

Sellafield Ltd’s security regulator, ONR (Office for Nuclear Regulation), have instructed Sellafield Ltd and the wider civil nuclear industry to adopt the new GSC protective marking scheme known as Government Security Classifications (GSC).

Government Security Classifications

The new three tier system has three classifications: OFFICIAL, SECRET and TOP-SECRET.

Additionally ONR have mandated the use of an additional classification: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE for Sensitive Nuclear Information which is classified below SECRET.

Implementing GSC

In line with the rest of UK government, the new GSC scheme is coming into operation on April 2nd 2014. All documents (including commercial correspondence, drawings, specifications, data sheets etc) created by Sellafield Ltd after this date for issue to suppliers will carry the new markings. Documents created prior to this date will continue to carry their existing markings until such time as they are amended in the normal course of work when the new markings will be applied at the same time.

You can find more information about GSC and implementing GSC by following this

Link to Core Briefing for 3rd Party Suppliers

More here;

UK nuclear submarine fleet increases its costs with an undecided future after “high fuel burn up” test of prototype reactor at Dounreay – UK stakeholders ignored again!

…The big nuclear companies threatened DECC from withdrawing all co-operation concerning nuclear matters if they insisted on asking for information that was needed for the stakeholders to argue their points. So, DECC (And NDA) was actually blackmailed (By the “individual and other companies”)….

https://nuclear-news.net/2014/03/06/uk-nuclear-submarine-fleet-increases-its-costs-with-an-undecided-future-after-high-fuel-burn-up-test-of-prototype-reactor-at-dounreay-uk-stakeholders-ignored-again/

I am writing in response to your request
of 22 August for “
copies of the correspondence/reports between the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority and the
Department for Energy and Climate Change regarding the conclusions of the work the NDA has recently undertaken into the management of the UK’s separated plutonium stocks

“…However there is a very high public interest for withholding this information. If the information were released it is less likely that that the individual companies concerned and others would provide the NDA or this Department with commercially sensitive information in the future. This would impede the NDA’s ability in carrying out its role effectively to consider properly the commercial viability of the technical options. Further as procurement is a likely part of securing a future plutonium disposition route, release of this information could threaten the NDA’s ability to secure value for money for UK taxpayers. This would be highly contrary to the public interest….”

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/244093/13_1157.pdf

More new news here including USA enrichment hopes in Mexico

07.03.2014_No10 / World Nuclear Review

Urenco Remains Bullish, Despite Fall In Earnings

Uranium & Fuel

http://www.nucnet.org/all-the-news/2014/03/07/urenco-remains-bullish-despite-fall-in-earnings

7 Mar (NucNet): Nuclear fuel enrichment company Urenco, jointly owned by the German, British and Dutch governments, has reported a four percent drop in full-year core earnings because customer demand has slowed.

The UK-based company, which its owners are looking to partly sell, saw 2013 earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) fall to 968 million euros (EUR) (1.3 billion US dollars) from EUR 1.01 billion the previous year.

Revenue fell to EUR 1.52 billion from a record EUR 1.60 billion in 2012, the company said.

Urenco group chief executive officer Helmut Engelbrecht said 2013 remained “challenging” in some of the company’s traditional markets. Reduced demand led to a slowdown of the market and increased worldwide inventories valued at EUR 353.2 million.

But Mr Engelbrecht said Urenco retained its 31 percent share of the world market for uranium enrichment services, underlining its position as a market leader. “Following our record year in 2012, we met our revenue expectations in 2013,” he said.

The company said its enrichment facility in the US enables it to provide a domestic enrichment service to North American customers. The New Mexico facility is now the only commercial operational enrichment facility in the US.

More links here

https://nuclear-news.net/2014/02/27/japan-u-s-move-to-expand-nuclear-power-programs-despite-contamination-at-fukushima-new-mexico/

https://nuclear-news.net/2014/01/16/the-new-japanese-secrecy-law-takes-effect-concerning-radiation-health-effects/

https://nuclear-news.net/2013/11/28/womens-and-community-groups-angered-at-japans-new-secrecy-law/

https://nuclear-news.net/2014/02/08/is-the-uks-nuclear-backed-pension-bubble-about-to-burst-new-scientific-research-may-be-the-pin-that-pricks/

 

Advertisements

March 9, 2014 - Posted by | Uncategorized

5 Comments »

  1. Reblogged this on nuclear-news and commented:

    As the Japanese Secrets Act implementation looms on 10th December 2014, I thought it appropriate to remind our UK viewers that the new UK Secrets Act has already been Implemented from April 2nd 2014.. More here – (And as i the nuclear Information will be retroactively applied, you can see, as why I had to leave the UK.
    Will the Japanese who disseminates health and nuclear information have to do the same? Will the new Japanese Secrets Act apply retroactively too?) Posted by Shaun McGee (aka Arclight2011)
    And this link for info on the Japanese Secrets Act;
    https://nuclear-news.net/2014/09/29/japans-secrecy-law-and-international-standards-%e7%89%b9%e5%ae%9a%e7%a7%98%e5%af%86%e4%bf%9d%e8%ad%b7%e6%b3%95%e3%81%a8%e5%9b%bd%e9%9a%9b%e5%9f%ba%e6%ba%96-japan-focus/

    Comment by arclight2011part2 | November 27, 2014 | Reply

  2. Reblogged this on Radiation Free Lakeland and commented:
    Secrecy and Lies ….all that is needed for the nuclear industry to flourish

    Comment by mariannewildart | November 28, 2014 | Reply

  3. Thanks for staying on top of things. The UK is part of an Open Governance group now. It appears that this is their solution, though it looks in violation of Open Governance. Bureaucracies produce so much in documentation it is hard to know what is missing. The subs are a very important topic as they are moving them all to Faslane now plus trying to dump the old ones on Chapelcross in Scotland or Sellafield. We were contacted by an 80 year old US Vet who cleaned radiation filters from US spy planes (spying on the Russian nuke program) and the US STILL refuses to give him the documents needed to show his rad exposure. However, since the ICRP allows so much exposure to skin it probably wouldn’t do any good. Areva refuses to give needed info to Savannah River Site Watch. Thanks for the clarification of the Japanese situation. I thought it had already come in. Glad all is well and hope you are enjoying Ireland and learning Irish if you don’t know it already.
    By the way the top link is dead but if you google it can still be found.

    Comment by miningawareness | November 28, 2014 | Reply

  4. I’m not adding the new link in case they are killing the links on purpose. I never know if they are constantly moving and updating or killing links but a lot of US DOE links are dead if linked to wikipedia or even in general searches.

    Comment by miningawareness | November 28, 2014 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: