Private investors are not rushing into nuclear. The Netherlands has chosen another path

The Dutch government has therefore opted for a wholly state-owned company.
the Dutch government is also responding to recommendations from the International Atomic Energy Agency
Martin Voříšek, 19 August 2026, https://oenergetice.cz/en/nuclear-power/private-investors-are-not-rushing-into-nuclear-the-netherlands-has-chosen-another-path
The Dutch government is gradually preparing a financing model for two new nuclear power plants in the country. After assessing investor interest, it concluded that private investors are unwilling to bear a substantial share of the construction risks. The state has therefore taken the leading role through the wholly state-owned company NEO NL. The state will also bear the costs of at least the initial phase of construction of the new units, in order to accelerate their delivery as much as possible.
The Netherlands is one of the less visible European countries pursuing the construction of new nuclear units. This is only because its preparations are still at an early stage. Its preparations follow a broader European trend in which new large-scale nuclear projects increasingly resemble anything but ordinary private investments. The state therefore acts in the project not only as regulator and provider of support, but directly as investor, lender and future owner of the project.
The Netherlands’ current advantage is that its project is only at the beginning of preparations. It can therefore still be adapted relatively painlessly to the current realities of the European market in order to ensure the earliest and least costly possible completion.
Private investors are not “rushing” to build
One of the key questions in the preparations was whether the project could be developed and delivered by private investors. However, as government documents show, private companies are prepared to participate only if the state assumes virtually all risks associated with preparing and building the power plants.
Construction of Hinkley Point C. Source: EDF
The current risks associated with building nuclear power plants are well known: in particular, long construction periods, uncertainty over costs, the duration of permitting processes, interest rate developments and future revenues in the electricity market. The combination of these factors has long constrained the ability of major nuclear projects to secure commercial financing without extensive public support.
A promising investment can thus very easily become an investor’s nightmare, entirely beyond the investor’s control.
NEO NL: State company responsible for building new units
The Dutch government has therefore opted for a wholly state-owned company, Nucleaire Energie Organisatie Nederland, abbreviated as NEO NL. Its task will be to prepare, build and operate the new nuclear power plants, with the state as its sole shareholder.
NEO NL was established on 16 February 2026 and is set to assume the role of future owner and operator of the units. In doing so, the Dutch government is also responding to recommendations from the International Atomic Energy Agency, according to which the future operator should become involved in project preparations as early as the design and construction phase.
The state expects this arrangement to provide greater control over the project, particularly over the choice of technology, risk allocation and the long-term operation of the plants.
State control over technology selection was, after all, also one of the priorities of the Czech government. It first excluded suppliers from China and Russia from the tender to supply units at Dukovany, while the final choice was also the result of agreement between ČEZ and the state.
The state will take over project financing, at least during the first construction phase
As early as October 2025, the Dutch government stated that, according to its analysis, fully state-backed financing was the least costly option in terms of the project’s total costs. The state can generally obtain funding on better terms than a private company. While a higher share of private financing could reduce the impact on the budget, it would make the entire project more expensive.
Once the power plants are completed, the interest rate is to be set at the yield on Dutch government bonds plus one percentage point. In its documents, the Dutch government specifically refers to the Dukovany project, whose public-support model for one unit inspired it.
In June this year, the cabinet confirmed that the state would bear all financing costs for the two new large power plants, at least during the first phase of their construction. Private financing remains theoretically open for later refinancing or a potential equity contribution by the supplier, but not as the main source of funding in the early phase of the project.
Two locations under consideration, two main suppliers
Alongside the financing model, the question of the unit supplier is also gradually becoming clearer. The Netherlands initially assessed options from France’s EDF, US-based Westinghouse and South Korea’s KHNP. However, KHNP withdrew from the technology selection process in March 2025. Two Western technologies therefore remain in contention.
The project currently covers two large units, but the government is considering including an option for two additional reactors in the contract. Here, too, the Czech approach is an evident inspiration: the current contract with KHNP represents an order for two reactors at the Dukovany site and an option for two further reactors at Temelín. Such an approach could shorten preparations for the third and fourth units while improving the negotiating position in agreeing the price and delivery terms.
The site selection has not yet been fully finalised. Although the government excluded several initially considered options in June this year, it is still deciding between Eemshaven in the province of Groningen and a site near Terneuzen in Zeeland.
From the perspective of the transmission system, Eemshaven is the most favourable option. TenneT states that 3.2 GW of new capacity can be connected there without additional investment beyond the network expansion already planned. Terneuzen, by contrast, requires significant measures. According to TenneT, connecting 3.2 GW of new nuclear capacity would require further extensive grid upgrades, or potentially redispatching at costs of up to hundreds of millions of euros annually.
The cabinet wants to decide on its preferred site by the end of 2026. A proposal for a formal siting decision is to follow in the first half of 2027.
The Netherlands follows the Czech construction model
For Czechia, the Dutch development is important above all as further confirmation that the private financing model for large nuclear units in Europe is receding into the background. In both countries, the state is taking on the role of principal investor and establishing a structure intended to reduce financing costs while enabling long-term management of the project.
The Netherlands is directly drawing inspiration from the Czech approach to an interest-free loan during construction. However, the Czech model for Dukovany is more developed and entails a broader transfer of construction and financial risks to the public sector.
The difference lies primarily in the institutional arrangement. The Netherlands is creating a separate company, NEO NL, which is to prepare, own and operate the project, whereas the Czech project is being implemented through EDU II, with the state still holding a dominant stake and with a possible increase in the state’s share to as much as 100% through the nationalisation of parent company ČEZ.
Before the next nuclear crisis, listen to those who lived through the last one

By Renata Hessmann Dalaqua, Rebecca Davis Gibbons | August 6, 2026,
https://thebulletin.org/2026/08/before-the-next-nuclear-crisis-listen-to-those-who-lived-through-the-last-one/
The nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in the deaths and fatal injuries of more than 210,000 people, who either died instantaneously or within months. In addition to these victims, the hundreds of thousands who survived the bombings had to live with the consequences of radiation exposure, which could also affect their descendants.
Eighty-one years later, nuclear anxiety and fear appear to be rising amid increased levels of armed conflict involving nuclear powers around the world. But the testimonies and perspectives of thousands of people who have been affected by nuclear weapons use and testing remain regrettably absent from media coverage and the public debate.
As many worrying developments are described as “unprecedented,” it becomes critically important to hear from those who have lived through nuclear attacks in Japan as well as nuclear tests in Algeria, Australia, China, French Polynesia, Kazakhstan, Kiribati, India, Pakistan, the Marshall Islands, and the United States, among other places. The stories of nuclear survivors and their perspectives should be enough to remind leaders and the general public not to take nuclear threats lightly.
Remembering and learning from the past. In the aftermath of the atomic bombings in Japan, horrifying, first-hand accounts were featured in John Hersey’s 1946 book, Hiroshima. In his book, Hersey introduces six survivors and shares details of how they experienced the nuclear bombing, including its immediate impacts on their health, such as severe burns and radiation sickness. Initially published in an entire issue of The New Yorker on the first anniversary of the bombings, unannounced and placed behind a cover of a lively park scene with people enjoying various summer activities, the text became an immediate best seller and received great attention from specialized media and the general public, even being read over the radio in various countries.
Since then, several books have been written that contain analysis and testimonies from nuclear survivors. The Hiroshima Peace Culture Foundation, for instance, has compiled testimonies by survivors of the nuclear attack.
Akihiro Takahashi is one of the A-bomb survivors offering eyewitness testimony. Takahashi was 14 and a student at a Hiroshima high school. He remembers being blown by the blast and looking up to find that buildings had disappeared:
For a bewildered second I thought, “Hiroshima has vanished!” Coming to my senses, I quickly examined myself. My uniform was burned and tattered. The skin on the back of my head, my back, my arms and legs had peeled like rags, red flash was painfully exposed to the air. … I saw a line of A-bomb survivors looking dazed. … Many were virtually naked. It was exactly like a procession of ghosts.
This was just the beginning of the ordeal.
Nuclear survivors recount their many cancers or the litany of people in their communities who died of cancer or suffered other health problems in the aftermath of the bombing. These personal tragedies have been backed by studies across time of survivors in Japan and elsewhere that demonstrate more elevated incidence of thyroid cancer and other thyroid diseases than the general population, as well as elevated risks of breast, leukemia, stomach, and colon cancers. These impacts disproportionately affect children because their smaller body mass means their internal organs have less tissue shielding them from radiation compared to adults. Many of the health consequences would not manifest for years after exposure, and nuclear survivors have lived with persistent anxiety about transmitting their radiation-induced health issues to the next generations. And not only in Japan.
There are reports of an increase in infant mortality in New Mexico after the Trinity test of July 1945 and in Australia after the United Kingdom’s Maralinga tests in the 1950s. In the Marshall Islands, where the United States conducted 67 nuclear tests between 1946 and 1958, women reportedly suffered miscarriages and gave birth to stillborn babies or “jellyfish babies,” which were infants born with translucent skin and no bones.
For many survivors, pregnancy and labor after radiation exposure took on added psychological stress. As Hiroshima survivor Keiko Ogura recounts:
Before I delivered my baby until the last moment, I was so scared. … Everybody had a hard time. “My baby, my child, is he okay or not?” always mothers are thinking. [With] nuclear weapons stays future fear. Not all casualties are burned or have scars. No, fear. Yes, fear, so deep in our hearts. Everybody had fear.
While there is a need for more scientific research on the generational effects of radiation exposure, many victims believe the illnesses and birth defects in their children and grandchildren are connected to their original exposure. This is the view of Lee Gyuyeo, another survivor of the Hiroshima bombing:
No words can describe the gravity of the aftereffects on the second and third generations, not to mention on us, the first generation of nuclear victims. Our children and grandchildren, the second and third generations of survivors, continue to suffer from unexplained illnesses and are in unspeakable pain.
In addition to health problems, radiation contamination also leads to displacement and environmental deterioration.
In the Marshall Islands, radioactive fallout led to a two-pronged migration pattern, first, from outer islands to the capital, Majuro, and then, with a significant portion of the population relocating to other countries away from radiation and its concomitant harms. Continued displacement led to cultural dislocation and hindered the sense of belonging. As a young Marshallese student living in Fiji observed, “having your land taken away creates a limbo where you don’t know where to identify.”
Radioactive fallout from the tests on the Marshall Islands also resulted in environmental contamination that affected local foods and fish stocks. The need to avoid locally produced food and to rely on the consumption of processed products has been associated with diseases among the Marshallese population, including diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. Environmental impacts are further compounded by climate change. Rising sea levels elicit concern about the potential nuclear waste leakage in the Runit Dome, the concrete structure housing contaminated topsoil and radioactive debris on Runit Island.
Acknowledging the past to change the future. Many nuclear survivors feel that relevant governments never truly acknowledged the harm caused by the atomic bombings and nuclear testing programs or the extent of suffering they caused. Without acknowledgement, victims feel not only harmed but almost invisible, as if their experiences, sacrifices, and torments never happened. Media coverage and popular culture still too often glorify nuclear weapons and shirk consequences, adding to the burden carried by survivors.
Several ongoing initiatives by international organizations are trying to shed light on the impacts of nuclear war, including upcoming studies by the World Health Organization and an independent scientific panel established by the UN General Assembly, as well as technical assistance provided by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to the Marshall Islands. Although extremely important, these initiatives remain all but absent from public discourse and media coverage on nuclear weapons.
If new generations do not learn from the suffering and experience of nuclear survivors, they run the risk of seeing history repeat itself. Listening to nuclear survivors, teaching their struggles in schools, and telling their stories to leaders and the public are paramount if the world is to avoid—or at least postpone—the next nuclear catastrophe.
Why are we militarising Space?

Falling in behind the US, Australia signed the Trump Administration’s 2020 Artemis Accords which were designed to nullify the Moon Treaty and give the green light to US-led colonisation of the Moon for the purpose of commercial mining of its surface.
The US aims to dominate space militarily, and Australia is its willing accomplice.
20 August 2026 AIMN Editorial, https://theaimn.net/why-are-we-militarising-space/
By Michael Williss
The Australian Defence Force (ADF) released its 2026 Defence Strategy earlier this year, and an accompanying fact sheet said that “The ADF must be integrated across all five domains – maritime, land, air, space and cyber – as well as with international partners.”[1]
The reference to the “five domains” is important. Prior to 2020, there was only reference to the traditional warfare domains of the land, seas and air. As of January 2022, however, a new command force operating across the three traditional domains was created, now known as Space Command.[2]
The official embrace of Space as a war-fighting domain runs counter to the spirit, if not the letter, of two international Treaties signed by Australia: the UN Outer Space Treaty (OST) and the Moon Treaty.
The OST was a response by the world community to US and Soviet nuclear weapons tests in Space from 1958 to 1962. The largest US test occurred 400kms above and 1450kms south-west of Hawaii. It was 90 times the size of the blast at Hiroshima. It caused significant electrical damage in Hawaii, but also resulted, in the months that followed, in killing eight of the 24 satellites that were then in orbit around the Earth including the UK’s Telstar.[3]
This led to the ratification by UN member states of the OST in 1967. Amongst the provisions of the Treaty were:
outer space shall be free for exploration and use by all States;- outer space is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means;
- States shall not place nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in orbit or on celestial bodies or station them in outer space in any other manner.
However, there is a very large loophole between a nuclear weapon and a WMD through which any manner of weapons based on new technologies could be fired.
The 1979 Moon Treaty reiterated the points above and strengthened several of them. Australia signed it in 1986, but to date on 17 countries have done so. Opposition to it has been led by the US which refused to accept its restriction on “any military use of celestial bodies.”[4]
Falling in behind the US, Australia signed the Trump Administration’s 2020 Artemis Accords which were designed to nullify the Moon Treaty and give the green light to US-led colonisation of the Moon for the purpose of commercial mining of its surface.
Anywhere that the US dollar treads, the men with guns are there to protect it. As on Earth, so in Space. In 1985, under Ronald Reagan, the US created its Space Command. It lapsed after a while but was recreated under Trump in 2019 with a reemphasized focus on space as a warfighting domain. It established its own fighting force for Space, known as Guardians.
Col. Kyle Pumroy (Ret.) writing in the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies’ paper “Military Human Spaceflight: A Key Component to US Space Superiority,” said “now is the time to begin placing Guardians in space to develop the skills, tools, and concepts to build a future capacity to defend core US interests…”[5]
The US aims to dominate space militarily, and Australia is its willing accomplice.
The latest comments came on August 12 2026 at the US Army Space and Missile Defense Symposium in Alabama.[6]
US Space Command (SPACECOM) head Gen. Stephen Whiting, told attendees that SPACECOM’s top two priorities for fiscal 2029 through to 2033 are “integrated space fires” and capabilities to counter large constellations of satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO) in order to establish space superiority.
“We’re a combatant command and we fight to win wars. To win, we need credible, acknowledged, kinetic and non-kinetic fires. They are a key component of how we establish space superiority and restore credible deterrence,” he said.
Kinetic refers to the movement of a physical body such as a missile for the purpose of the destruction of an adversary’s material assets; non-kinetic refers to such movement as use of radio waves for jamming an adversary’s communications systems.
Whiting’s deputy, Lt. Gen. Rick Zellmann, on Tuesday told the symposium that the US military now has “policy” approval for three basic types of space fires: ground-to-space fires that “we’ve been doing for years” with “communications jamming systems;” space-to-space attacks known as “orbital warfare;” and, given that the Trump administration plans to build space-based interceptors for the US Golden Dome missile shield, space-to-ground.
Responsibility for ground to space fires is shared with the Army, the Air Force and Marines, but orbital warfare and space to ground fires are the preserve of SPACECOM.
Australian company EOS claimed that Australia is one of just two countries with the capabilities to neutralise large numbers of satellites passing over its territory.[7] EOS spokesperson Dr Ben Greene said Australian Space Domain Awareness (SDA) covered around one sixth of the sky, delivered by, among others, EOS with its laser tracking facility in Canberra, the RAAF’s space telescope in WA and the new US-owned LeoLabs Australia space radar, also in WA. “We could intercept and interdict the satellite operations of any country on earth, if we chose to. That’s a really powerful platform for us,” he said. “It’s quite feasible now to talk about taking out hundreds of satellites a day if that was necessary.”
An ASPI (aka Australian Serving Predatory Imperialism) spokesperson supported EOS’s vision for the military use of Space, saying: “We need a much more ambitious approach to how we think about defence and space. It can’t just be for communications provision. It’s got to be about space control. It’s got to be how we respond to a contested space domain when China is rapidly developing counter-space capabilities and fully intends to use them in the next war. Space will quickly become a warfighting environment, not because of our own actions but because of decisions in Beijing.”
No doubt Russia and China are developing military space technologies similar to those of the US. But we are not their appendages in the same way as we are in relation to the US.
We must do what we can to stop the militarisation of Space, including support for or participation in US space war plans.
Australia must call for the strengthening of the OST to include all weapons in Space, and for the banning of Earth to Space, Space to Space, and Space to Earth military activity.
Australia must join those nations that have pledged to a no first use (NFU) policy on placing weapons in Space and call on the US, Russia and China to do the same.
Australia must ensure any developments in Space are done for purposes other than “colonization” by any state or nation on earth. The exploration and use of Space for peaceful cooperation among nations should be our goal.
That is the only way we can contribute to humanity and not be a burden on it.
[1] 2026 National Defence Strategy Factsheet
[2] Space Command (Australia) – Wikipedia
[3] The Space Review: Remembering Starfish Prime
[5] Guardians_in_Space_Policy_Paper_65-Final.pdf
[6] Joint force needs kinetic and non-kinetic weapons for space war: Whiting – Breaking Defense
Anglers win Hinkley information battle

Hinkley generation company must now respond to requests for information
Tuesday 18th August 2026,
https://www.wsfp.co.uk/news/environment-news/angling-fishing-environment-hinkley-point-938586
An anglers’ pressure group has won a landmark legal ruling confirming that the company building Hinkley Point C cannot refuse to answer environmental information requests simply because it is privately owned.
A London tribunal ruled this week that NNB Generation Company, the EDF subsidiary responsible for Hinkley Point C, must now respond to requests for information about the power station’s cooling water intake, environmental protection measures and possible environmental compensation.
A spokesperson for the pressure group Fish Legal, which uses environmental law to protect rivers, lakes and coastal fisheries on behalf of anglers, said: “The company must now either provide the information or identify specific legal grounds under environmental law for withholding it”
“The judgment confirms that when a private company is entrusted with major public functions and granted exceptional statutory powers, private ownership does not necessarily place its decisions beyond public scrutiny.
“The ruling may influence future cases involving other private companies exercising comparable functions and powers.”
Zoe Wedderburn-Day, head of policy and strategy at Fish Legal, said: “The new government wants essential infrastructure built more quickly. Much of that programme will depend on private companies using powers granted to them by the state.
Those companies cannot be given exceptional public powers and then close the door when people ask how the powers are being used. Public confidence depends on meaningful transparency and accountability.”
Ms Wedcderburn-Day added: “This judgment does not decide which environmental protection technology should be used at Hinkley Point C. It confirms that NNB cannot avoid answering environmental information requests simply by saying that it is a private company.
“The immediate issue is whether the company will now provide the information or explain clearly why it believes any part of it should remain withheld.”
NNB may seek permission to take the case to the Court of Appeal.
SMRs and microreactors in the military

Aleksander Olech, 15 August 2026
Small modular reactors are not a technology that will solve every problem
faced by an army during wartime. They will not replace fuel, the deployment
of forces or existing sources of energy. On the other hand, they could
become an important element in preparing the state for crisis and war.
Modern armed forces need not only soldiers, tanks and artificial
intelligence, but also a stable power supply for the systems on which
military operations depend. It is from this perspective that the military
importance of SMRs and microreactors should be developed.
Modern warfare is
not limited to strikes against selected military units. Increasingly, it
begins with an attempt to paralyse the state by depriving it of energy,
transport capabilities, communications and the ability to exercise command
rapidly. Russia has demonstrated this in its operations against Ukraine.
Attacks against energy infrastructure are not an addition to a military
operation, but part of the way in which war is conducted.
Hybrid activities
may also serve as a prelude to open conflict, while a strike against the
state’s support infrastructure may precede direct action on the
battlefield.
Defence24 15th Aug 2026, https://defence24.com/armed-forces/smrs-and-microreactors-in-the-military
Today In Dystopia: Burning Books For Israel, Burning Books For AI
Caitlin Johnstone, Aug 20, 2026
I’ve been putting out more and more of these “today in dystopia” write-ups because our society is plunging into iron-fisted authoritarianism and AI-induced idiocracy so rapidly that it’s hard to keep up with how it’s unfolding day by day without shoveling multiple stories into a single essay.
Today in dystopia they’re really going after books. A library in Sydney has removed the book “How to Sell a Genocide” by Adam Johnson from its shelves after Zionists complained about its criticisms of Israeli mass atrocities in Gaza.
The Guardian reports:
“A Sydney library has removed a book critical of Israel called How to Sell a Genocide, following a complaint reportedly from a survivor of the Bondi beach terror attack.
“Waverley library at Bondi Junction is in the same council area as Bondi beach.
“A Waverley council spokesperson said: “The book has been removed from library shelves for review, and council will further consider processes to ensure closer oversight of book selection.”
“They seem to be objecting largely based on the title using the word ‘genocide’,” Johnson commented. “But ‘genocide’ is not my word, or my finding. The fact of genocide in Gaza is the overwhelming consensus of the human rights world, and it is a wholly mainstream opinion among those tasked with studying and determining such matters.”
So in Australia they’re now banning books for Israel. I guess it was only a matter of time.
Also today in dystopia, Amazon is buying and destroying rare books in a secret facility to train AI.
404 Media has been doing some great reporting on how companies like Google and Anthropic have been buying up rare and out-of-print books to train their LLM models before destroying them, and now 404 has a new article out describing how its reporters placed a tracking device on a shipment of books and followed it to an Amazon warehouse where the books are being scanned and shredded.
Here’s an excerpt:
“That final destination was an Amazon warehouse in Las Vegas, Nevada. Amazon employees who work at this location say all they do is receive massive shipments of printed books which they then cut the bindings off in order to scan the books more quickly. The printed book is destroyed in the process. The logo of the Amazon team that works at this warehouse, called VGT3, is a dinosaur, brandishing its teeth and with a book in its hands.”
That’s right: the logo for Amazon’s book-destroying location is an angry tyrannosaurus preparing to rip apart a book…………………………………
Today in dystopia, the Israeli government is working harder and harder to manipulate the information AI chatbots feed their users about Israel and its myriad military projects in the middle east.
Politico reports:
“Israel has launched a new campaign to influence how large-language models like ChatGPT are answering questions about Gaza and the Israel Defense Forces amid declining public support for the country across the U.S. political spectrum.
“French PR firm Havas Media, which runs the lion’s share of Israel’s FARA-registered foreign influence work in the U.S., appears to have stood up an ‘institute’ aimed at feeding LLMs positive information about Israel via one of its subcontractors, boutique ad agency Piro, Inc.”
This builds on previous reporting from Drop Site News about FARA revelations showing that former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale secured a lucrative deal with Israel to set up dummy pro-Israel websites designed to be read not by humans, but by the web crawlers that LLMs get their information from. Drop Site found that Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and Perplexity were the AI companies most vulnerable to Parscale’s manipulations.
Today in dystopia it’s becoming more and more common for online commenters to accuse me of using AI to write my essays, which I have never done and will never do.
I hate that this is a thing now. I’ve been writing essays every day for a decade, and nobody who’s been reading me for a long time believes I use AI. But now that so many people are using these creepy chatbots to do everything for them, people believe it’s impossible for a human brain to produce a few paragraphs of text.
I don’t mind the accusations, I just hate what it says about where we’re heading as a species. These things have only existed for a few years, but some people are already forgetting what it was like to be able to use your own mind to complete simple cognitive tasks. I find it deeply disturbing.https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/today-in-dystopia-burning-books-for?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=82124&post_id=211937785&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1ise1&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Jared Kushner: US will back Israeli resumption of war if Hamas fails to honor disarmament commitments

Kushner said Hamas could surrender weapons and tunnels within 60 to 90 days, calling demilitarization a potential major security gain for Israel.
Jerusalem Post, ByJAMES GENN, AUGUST 18, 2026
Hamas must honor its commitments to disarm or face an IDF operation to “finish the job,” US special envoy Jared Kushner told FOX News’s Trey Yingst on Monday.
Kushner’s comments came after meetings with Hamas and the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG) in Cairo on Sunday, and respective meetings with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Isaac Herzog in Jerusalem on Monday.
“If they [Hamas] don’t follow through now on their commitment, everyone will see that they’re not genuine about peace, and then Israel will have a lot more support from the US and others to go and finish the job in the appropriate way,” Kushner stated………………………………
“For Israel, we think this is a win-win situation because if Hamas actually gives over the weapons and the tunnels willingly over the next 60 to 90 days, that obviously would be the elimination of a huge security threat for Israel, almost an unthinkable achievement,” he stated.
Trump admin. will not allow Gaza to be rebuilt until Hamas demilitarizes, Kushner says
The Trump administration will “not allow Gaza to be rebuilt until demilitarization occurs,” Kushner stated……………….. https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-905880
Tepco begins removal of radioactive spent fuel from Fukushima No. 2 reactor
Japan Times 18th Aug 2026,
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/08/18/japan/tepco-fuel-removal/

Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings said Monday it has started removing spent nuclear fuel emitting high-level radiation from the pool of the No. 2 reactor at its disaster-stricken Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant.
Last month, the company removed 28 unused nuclear fuel assemblies, which have a relatively lower risk, from the same reactor. Tepco hopes to complete the removal of spent fuel by the end of fiscal 2028.
Tepco has already finished removing seven of the 587 spent fuel assemblies from the No. 2 reactor. Removed fuel assemblies are transferred to a safer common storage pool at the nuclear plant in Fukushima Prefecture.
The fuel removal will be suspended from October due to checks on the facility and to secure space in the common pool.
Work related to the transfer of spent fuel started in June. Spent fuel assemblies are put into a container called a cask inside the reactor pool using a remote-controlled crane. Once a cask is filled, it is lifted up from the pool and then down to a trailer outside the reactor building, and the assemblies are moved to the common pool.
Tepco has completed fuel removal from the No. 3 and No. 4 reactors at the nuclear power station, which was heavily damaged in the March 2011 powerful earthquake and tsunami.
Fuel removal is slated to start in fiscal 2027 or fiscal 2028 at the No. 1 reactor, where work to remove debris is still being carried out.
Saudi Arabia in no hurry to bow to Trump’s demands on nuclear deal
For decades, Arab states held fast to the belief that the road to America
goes through Israel. Establishing ties with their Jewish neighbour, so the
theory went, was the surest way to gain the White House’s favour.
The Saudi-American agreement on nuclear co-operation announced last month tests that theory. A day after the deal was signed, President Trump, stung by
Israeli criticism, added a new condition. There would be no civil nuclear
plant for Saudi Arabia unless the kingdom joined his Abraham Accords, the
agreements under which the Gulf states would make peace with Israel.
The belated demand has thrown the future of the agreement into doubt. Officials
and analysts say the slow process to have the deal ratified by the US
Congress is under way, but the White House has tied itself into knots by
announcing a new condition that was not in the original agreement.
Times 20th Aug 2026,
https://www.thetimes.com/world/middle-east/article/saudi-us-nuclear-deal-trump-israel-demand-ppplvcts0
Uranium/Nuclear Industry news, week to 21 August

TOP STORIES.
Short sellers reap $2Bn profit as modular nuclear reactor stocks tumble.
Special investigation: UK’s nuclear waste a ‘calamity for future generations’ – ALSO AT https://nuclear-news.net/2026/08/21/1-a-special-investigation-uks-nuclear-waste-a-calamity-for-future-generations/
From the archives Nuclear power: molten salt reactors and sodium-cooled fast reactors make the radioactive waste problem WORSE.?
CLIMATE. It’s Getting So Hot That Nuclear Plants Are Being Forced to Power Down. Hungary to sink two barges near nuclear plant as river runs dry.
ECONOMICS. Russia Pushes Ahead With Uzbekistan Nuclear Plans Despite Money Troubles.
USA government handing out $billions to X-energy and TerraPower for advanced nuclear reactors, 26.8 billion nuclear refurbishment to begin in Pickering early next year.
ENERGY. Romania Restarts Coal Plant as Danube Drought Forces Nuclear Shutdown.
LEGAL. Hinkley Point C subsidiary must comply with environmental information rules, UTT rules.
MEDIA. Why the U.S. Military is ‘Earth’s Greatest Enemy’ (w/ Abby Martin) | The Chris Hedges Report
POLITICS. Nuclear material found in Syria will remain in the country, minister says.
SAFETY. The shocking story of the Flamanville 3 lid.
Thirty six incidents reported at Hartlepool nuclear power plant since 2025.
TECHNOLOGY. The Microreactor Miracle Meets a Morphing AI-Nuclear Future.
WASTES.
- Tepco begins removal of radioactive spent fuel from Fukushima No. 2 reactor.
- The 100,000-year plan for Finland’s and Sweden’s nuclear waste turns on something very small — whether bacteria half a kilometre underground can make enough sulphide to eat through five centimetres of copper.
- Summary of the Summary of the Integrated Guidelines – Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project.
- A Canadian lab ran real spent nuclear fuel through one chemical process and stripped 89% of its long-lived danger in 24 hours.
The Small (Modular Reactor) Short -Nuclear investors see “an industry bubble that is already deflating”

August 18, 2026, https://beyondnuclear.org/the-small-modular-reactor-short/
Nuclear investors see “an industry bubble that is already deflating”
Guess who’s making money from the alleged small modular reactor boom? Or rather, guess, who’s not making a profit? We’ve been calling the SMR schemes “crypto nukes” for a while, because they seemed like the same kind of scam as the crypto currency racket. But, it turns out, the SMR mirage has more in common with the US subprime mortgage scandal.
That debacle, which played out from 2007 to 2010, was immortalized in the excellent 2015 docudrama, The Big Short. It dramatized the true story of financial outsiders who realized that the US housing market was propped up on bad loans doomed to fail. By betting against those loans (the “short” of the title), before the market collapsed, they made themselves significant fortunes.
On August 18, the Financial Times(opens in new tab) ran a headline, “Short sellers reap $2bn profit as modular nuclear reactor stocks tumble.” (The article is behind a paywall, so we’ll paraphrase and quote it instead.)
It revealed how, predicting the “hype cycle” was about to collapse, and the fact that the three SMR companies in question — NuScale Power, Nano Nuclear and Oklo — were “lossmaking and have little or no revenue,” the short sellers pounced, reaping $2.1 billion in profits.
The article, replete with graphs showing plunging loss lines, paints a damning picture of an over-inflated industry with no actual there there. “A total of $30.3bn has been wiped off their collective market value since their peak in October last year amid growing concerns over the lack of immediate revenue and the long build-out timelines for the technology,” the Financial Times reported.
Beyond the three companies shorted, another of the close to 80 small reactor startup projects, X-energy, also “shed $5.8bn in market value since the surge that followed its initial public offering in April,” wrote Ramsey Hodgson, the FT reporter.

Predictably, the nuclear-promoting Breakthrough Institute tried to spin the whole thing as normal, with its nothing-to-see-here claim that the earlier over-inflation and current collapse of stock prices is “very typical of a company that is in this early, pre-consistent revenue phase,” the institute’s Adam Stein reassured the FT. Just birth pains, not a stillbirth, he appeared to insist.
But other financial experts interviewed for the story took a rather less rosy view. Enthusiasm for SMRs is waning now that it has become clear that most of the reactor startup companies have no revenue — and no reactors — to show for their efforts, and no sign of either on the horizon until at least 2030, an optimistic view to put it mildly.
Nano Nuclear has generated zero revenue and “posted a $14mn operating loss in the first quarter of the year,” the FT said. NuScale is facing a class action suit for defrauding investors after its plans collapsed. Oklo has yet to secure a regulatory license.
As we have repeatedly pointed out here at Beyond Nuclear, and as the FT reiterates, “timelines for delivery of the unproven reactors remain uncertain.” Or maybe not so uncertain. They simply won’t arrive at all.
USA government handing out $billions to X-energy and TerraPower for advanced nuclear reactors

X-energy, TerraPower share updates on advanced reactor projects
Mon, Aug 17, 2026, https://www.ans.org/news/2026-08-17/article-8297/xenergy-terrapower-share-updates-on-advanced-reactor-projects/
The two main players of the Department of Energy’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program, X-energy and TerraPower, have both announced significant developments in their projects to deploy advanced commercial-scale reactors.
X-energy to get another $1 billion: During its second-quarter earnings call on Thursday, CEO Clay Sell said the DOE notified X-energy that it would receive an additional $1 billion in cost-shared funding for its Long Mott project. The company wants to build four Xe-100 reactors at Dow’s UCC Seadrift Operations, a chemical production facility in Seadrift, Texas. It would be the first advanced reactor deployment of its kind at an industrial site in North America.
Combined with the $1 billion X-energy has already received from DOE, the company will have received roughly $2.15 billion for the Seadrift project, Sell said. X-energy will be required to follow the same cost-share requirements as in the earlier allocation…….
Highlighted other key second-quarter moments and developments for the company during the call, including the following:
- Entering into long-term agreements for high-assay low-enriched uranium enrichment services with Centrus Energy Corp. and General Matter.
- Entering into an agreement with SGL Carbon to expand manufacturing capacity for nuclear-grade graphite.
- Receiving an $11 million economic development grant from Tennessee to support its TRISO-X fuel fabrication campus in Oak Ridge.
- Acquiring roughly 70 acres adjacent to its Oak Ridge campus to expand its TRISO-X footprint.
With regard to Long Mott, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is expected to complete its construction permit review later this year, with a permit issuance decision likely in the first half of 2027, according to Sell. X-energy is also expected to submit its construction permit application to the NRC in the first half of next year for the Cascade Advanced Energy Facility project in Washington state with Amazon and Energy Northwest.
Lastly, an announcement of a 1-GW project with an unnamed utility is coming “in the near future,” Sell said.
TerraPower, South Korean companies reach deals: TerraPower is looking to strengthen its ties with South Korea and has reached agreements with Hyundai Engineering & Construction (HDEC) and SK Innovation to develop and commercialize the Natrium reactor in the United States, Korea, and select international markets. This comes after TerraPower officials—including founder and chair Bill Gates and president and CEO Chris Levesque—traveled to South Korea to meet with Prime Minister Seong-sook Han and leaders from the Export-Import Bank of Korea, HD Hyundai, HDEC, and SK Innovation.
Under the agreement reached with HDEC, the Korean company will be TerraPower’s engineering, procurement, and construction contractor and will build up to eight of its Natrium reactors with completion, price, and performance guarantees. TerraPower is currently constructing its first Natrium reactor—a 345-MWe sodium-cooled fast reactor with molten salt heat storage to temporarily boost power output to 500 MWe—in Kemmerer, Wyo.
TerraPower’s term-sheet agreement with SK Innovation clears a pathway for Korea’s first Natrium plant, along with plans to expand internationally. The two companies will explore opportunities to collaborate on engineering and digital innovation solutions, including digital twin technology and artificial intelligence, the news release said.
“Today marks a pivotal moment for TerraPower as we embark on a new chapter of international collaboration with Korea’s leading organizations,” Levesque said. “Combining TerraPower’s innovative advanced nuclear technology with Korea’s nuclear construction and operational expertise will strengthen our global cooperation and accelerate the deployment of a Natrium fleet that will transform the world’s energy landscape.”
The shocking story of the Flamanville 3 lid

Monday, July 6, 2026by Bernard Laponche , Michel Labrousse, https://global-chance.org/L-effarante-histoire-du-couvercle-de-Flamanville-3
EDF has just announced the arrival on site of the new reactor vessel head for the Flamanville EPR (press release of June 16, 2026 [ 1 ] ). This new head is to be installed during the first comprehensive outage (VC1), scheduled to begin in September 2026 and last 350 days.
Why change the reactor vessel head, the reactor’s key component, two years after the EPR’s first criticality (September 3, 2024), and only five months after commercial operation and the completion of the EPR’s start-up tests?
The failure and rupture of the reactor vessel of an EPR-type nuclear reactor, including its head and bottom, are not assumed in the safety demonstration, in accordance with the “exclusion of rupture” principle; no measures are taken to mitigate the consequences of these events, which are assumed not to occur. Consequently, the quality of the steel and the manufacturing process must be impeccable.
As early as 2005, the French Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) alerted EDF (Électricité de France) that the Creusot Forge plant was experiencing serious quality problems. A major beneficiary of the nuclearization of French electricity production, decided in 1974, Creusot Forge saw its activity decline dangerously in the early 2000s, and the rigor of its manufacturing quality was called into question. The instability of the company’s shareholding between 2003 and 2006 only exacerbated the situation. Despite this, Creusot Forge secured the contract for the reactor vessel head and lid for the Flamanville EPR. The ASN’s warnings went unheeded, and breaches of manufacturing procedures and falsification of quality control documents occurred without the ASN’s knowledge.
However, an anomaly in the composition of the steel used in the EPR reactor vessel, particularly the bottom and the lid, was identified as early as 2006 by AREVA. But this did not prevent the manufacture and installation of the vessel. The decision not to postpone the commissioning of the EPR constitutes a scandal covered up by the promulgation of the so-called “ESPN” decree (order of December 30, 2015), which allowed AREVA and EDF to circumvent regulations.
It was only in April 2014 that the French Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) made public the non-compliance of the two components crucial to the safety of the EPR, and it was only through an economic compromise in 2018 that the ASN authorized the commissioning and use of the EPR reactor vessel. The ASN’s decision authorizing the commissioning and use of the defective vessel and lid, stipulating that it be replaced before December 31, 2024 (i.e., after six years of service, since the reactor’s commissioning was then planned for 2018… it will only be effective in 2024) had been preceded by a public consultation.
To demonstrate that the ASN’s decision was unjustified and that the public consultation should be cancelled, Global Chance published a note on September 12, 2018, written by Bernard Laponche, entitled:
COMMENTARY ON THE DRAFT DECISION OF THE NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORIZING THE COMMISSIONING AND USE OF THE EPR REACTOR TANK AT THE FLAMANVILLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (INB No. 167).
We are republishing Global Chance’s note of September 12, 2018, which remains entirely relevant.
Despite this warning, the ASN’s decision was published on October 9, 2018 [ 2 ] .
When the EPR was officially commissioned on May 7, 2024, by the French Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN), some voices called for a postponement until the new reactor vessel head was available and installed. The aim was to delay commissioning by only a few months, a move EDF, driven by political considerations, refused.
The original reactor vessel head is now a significant source of nuclear waste (approximately one hundred tons) whose storage and treatment conditions are uncertain, as neither EDF nor ORANO has provided any reliable information.
Senior Israeli official calls for killing of “30 to 40” people in Gaza every night: “They’re not even people”

By Frank Andrews, August 17, 2026 , CBS News
Israel’s far-right national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, in a podcast published over the weekend, called for “30 to 40” people to be killed per night in targeted assassinations in the Gaza Strip.
Discussing Israel’s response to the Hamas-led terrorist attack on Oct. 7, 2023, which sparked the war in Gaza, and Israel’s recent move to reduce the number of strikes being carried out in the decimated Palestinian territory, Ben-Gvir said: “It’s no secret, I disagree with the prime minister … I think targeted assassinations should be carried out in Gaza, taking down 30 to 40 every night.”
“Not just those who pose an immediate threat,” added the Israeli cabinet member. “There are people there who are not worthy of life. They shouldn’t live. They’re not even people.”
The security chief made the comment to Rom Braslavski, who was previously held as a hostage in Gaza, on his Sunday podcast.
Israel once had a block of 21 settlements — known as Gush Katif — in the Gaza Strip, but the settlers and Israeli forces pulled out of the enclave two decades ago.
“I see all of Gaza as ours,” Ben-Gvir said in the taped interview. “Settlements not just in Gush Katif but throughout Gaza, encouraging as much emigration as possible, sending them to their countries. And for the terrorists, no emigration, nothing, just to kill them one by one.”
Legal experts and the Secretary-General of the United Nations have warned that any move to force Palestinians to leave Gaza could amount to ethnic cleansing.
Israel’s vast network of settlements in the occupied West Bank — the other, much larger Palestinian territory — are considered illegal by the United Nations, the International Court of Justice and many other entities and nations. Israel’s current government has encouraged new construction in the West Bank, however, and it disputes the illegality of most of the settlements in the territory.
“Inciting violence”
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi posted about Ben-Gvir’s comments on X Monday. “These confessions must be recorded and preserved for the day of reckoning and trial of these criminals,” he wrote.
Similar statements by Ben-Gvir and other senior Israeli officials have been presented to the U.N. as evidence of an alleged genocidal intent by Israel’s government in Gaza.
The national security minister is no stranger to controversy…………………………..
Ben-Gvir is a follower of Kahanism, a movement named after a long-dead rabbi who espoused violent ethnonationalism and advocated for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank.
The security chief’s first moment in the spotlight came in 1995, when he stole the Cadillac emblem off then-Israeli leader Yitzhak Rabin’s car. Rabin was hated among the Israeli far-right for signing the Oslo Peace Accords with the Palestinians. Ben-Gvir held up the badge to a TV camera and said: “Just as we got to his car, we will get to him.”
Rabin was assassinated weeks later by a Jewish far-right nationalist. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-ben-gvir-gaza-netanyahu-kill-every-night/
-
Archives
- August 2026 (241)
- July 2026 (355)
- June 2026 (287)
- May 2026 (306)
- April 2026 (356)
- March 2026 (251)
- February 2026 (267)
- January 2026 (308)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (375)
- September 2025 (257)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



