THIS SUNKEN NUCLEAR SUB IS LEAKING RADIATION INTO THE OCEAN

THIS SUNKEN NUCLEAR SUB IS LEAKING RADIATION INTO THE OCEAN, https://futurism.com/the-byte/sunken-nuclear-sub-leaking-radiation _KRISTIN HOUSER__10 Jul19

Sunken Measures

A team of Russian and Norwegian scientists just made a grim, timely discovery.

Just one week after a nuclear-powered Russian submarine caught fire, killing 14 sailors, researchers sent a remote submarine to collect samples around the sunken wreckage of another nuclear sub, which caught fire in 1989 leading to the deaths of 42 crew members.

The preliminary results of their investigation indicate that radiation levels in the water near the sunken Soviet sub’s ventilation duct are up to 800,000 times higherthan expected in sea water — suggesting we may be dealing with the repercussions of the recent disasterfor decades to come.

This isn’t the first time researchers have detected higher than normal radiation levels around the wreckage of K-278 Komsomolets, which sunk about 260 miles off the Norwegian coast and is now about a mile beneath the ocean’s surface.

“We took water samples from inside this particular duct because the Russians had documented leaks here both in the 1990s and more recently in 2007,” expedition leader Hilde Elise Heldal said in a press release. “So we weren’t surprised to find high levels here.”

While the current levels are higher than normal, according to Heldal, they aren’t high enough to threaten Norwegian fish or seafood — so for now, the team plans to thoroughly study its collected samples and continue to monitor to wreckage for signs that the radiation is getting worse.

1 Comment »

Only God knows how much Radioactive waste has run-off, from the Continental United states and Asia, are in the oceans. God knows how many barrels of nuclear waste from countries like France, The USA, and Russia Have been carted out on freightors into the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans to dump. The French Blew-up a Greanpeace ahip by New Zealand for dogging one of Frances-Nuclear Waste-Dumping Freightors.

The Russians continue to have the shittyist, most dangerous reactor designs in the world running on undependable mox made in Mayak. 2 may have already gone off since Chernobyl. You will not hear about that. There were elevated radiation readings in europe, since fukushima that came from russia and, stunk of hilevel reactor releases. Busby used a Gamma Spectrometer off the coast of the Baltic Sea, by Russia and found that Ceceium 134 and 137 levels were twice, as high there post Chernobyl as they should be, in 2017.

America is a radioactive crudhole , with places like Hanford, 3 mile island, Multiple open air nuclear tests for decades. 97 of the leakiest, old cracked, embrittled-nuclear reactors in the world. 10s of thousands of tons of the worst highlevel nuclear waste spread across the USA.
Now think about Russia and Japan and the Arctic ocean and Pacific ocean for a minute.

Many Places in Russia are so radioacive, one cannot stand for 30 minutes witout dropping dead. Russia has the distinction of being one of tge most radioactive country’s on earth! Up there with Japan and many places in America.

The CIA will tell you about Russias shrinking demographics but, they will not tell the truth about it.
Half the men and women in Russia have fertililiy problems from massive radionuclide contamination. The CIA says it is from an aging Russian poulation and bad russian economy. I knew a Russian doctor that was in a port where a russian sub blew in the late 80s. She has had dysmennorhea and has been bleeding since then.

The Russian’s run nuclear-powered ice breakers in the arctic. America is a radioactive shithole and so is Russia . The russians have dumped two hundred thousand tons of high level nuclear waste in the arctic ocean. That includes the old nuclear reactors it has pushed into the Arctic and baltic oceans and the old nuclear submarines there. Altogether there are probably a half million-tons of the highest level radionuclides dumped in the arctic ocean from Russia, the Usa, France and England. Some of that high level waste is conatantly changing. Some has longer lasting, heat generating radionucleides like Pyrophic Plutonium
Uraniums
Strontiums THESE ARE STRONG
Cesium 134-137 BETA-GAMMA EMITTERS
Radioactive Cobalts

Germanium-72, 73, 74, 76
Arsenic-75
Strontiums 88-90
Polonium 220
Selenium-77, 78, 79, 80, 82
Bromine-81
Rubidium-85, 87
Iodine 129
Yttrium-89
Zirconium-90 to 96
Niobium-95
Technetium-99
Ruthenium-101 to 106

Things like strontium 90, plutonium and
CESIUM134-137 are migrating to the pacific ocean from the Arctic Ocean, so there is the Fukushima nuclear excrement in the pacific and everything else.

The Russians brag about a floating reactor in the arctic . That crappy old reactor will dump nuclear waste into the ocean and forwver be prone to exploding there. The Russians dump old nuclear submarines and exploded reactors in the arctic ocean. Americans and the UK and France have dumped subs into the oceans too.

Comment by ken | July 11, 2019 | Reply

1.This Month

United Nations: demasking the Torture of Julian Assange. Rico Brouwer and Nils Melzer

Three Mile Island (& Fukushima) Lies & Cover-Ups w/ Gundersen & Wasserman

Energy efficiency – theme for July 2019

Energy efficiency represents the single largest potential contributor to global emissions reduction, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA 2017). It should be a key part of the global energy strategy, for several reasons:

It could reduce global electric demand by more than 20 per cent, based on current rates in the U.S. power sector, while maintaining high levels of services such as heating and lighting.
It avoids the need for increased energy, capacity and grid services, making it the least expensive way to decarbonise at scale.
It can reduce carbon dioxide emissions by billions of tonnes.

A dramatic example of the power of energy efficiency is lighting. In 2017 the United States passed the milestone of 1 billion LED and CFL lights installed, avoiding 142 million tonnes a year of carbon dioxide emissions, at a cost of about $7 per ton of avoided carbon dioxide. In contrast, the cumulative installed capacity of rooftop solar reached 8,000 MW in 2017, saving 8 million tonnes a year of carbon dioxide, at a cost of $360 per ton. Lighting efficiency thus yielded almost 18 times the avoided carbon dioxide, at about 2 per cent the cost per ton of rooftop solar.

Google provides another example of the power of energy efficiency. Its data centers now use 50 per cent less energy than the average data center, according to the company. Google also developed an improved chip, the TPU, which performs 83 times better than standard CPUs. The new chip allowed Google to reduce power consumption at its data centers by a factor of 30—far exceeding the effect on Google’s carbon footprint of all of the company’s renewable energy purchases. ” – John Woolard, Eco Business, 10 June 2019

nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope