TEPCO defends Fukushima ‘ice wall,’ but it is still too porous

Rows of tanks holding contaminated groundwater are seen at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant in February.

The “frozen soil wall” erected around the crippled reactor buildings at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant at huge taxpayer expense appears limited in keeping groundwater from flowing in.

Tokyo Electric Power Co., which operates the plant, said March 1 that 95 tons of radioactive water has been reduced a day on average between December and early February because of the underground barrier.

“Contaminated groundwater was cut in half due to the wall,” a TEPCO official said.

TEPCO estimated that the volume of polluted groundwater would have amounted to about 189 tons if the ice wall had not been in place during that period.

The utility also said the amount of polluted groundwater was reduced by about 400 tons a day now due to combined measures, such as the wall and wells pumping up water, compared with before such measures were taken.

But Toyoshi Fuketa, chairman of the Nuclear Regulation Authority, has insisted that the wells, not the wall, are the “key” to controlling the groundwater, voicing skepticism about the role of the ice wall.

The utility is proceeding with work to reinforce the wells.

The 34.5 billion yen ($322 million) frozen soil wall project began in 2014 to lay out the 1,500-meter-long underground wall around the No. 1-4 reactor buildings.

A large number of pipes were inserted to a depth of 30 meters to circulate liquid with a temperature of minus 30 degrees through them to freeze the surrounding soil.

It was designed to prevent groundwater from flowing into the plant and mixing with highly radioactive water in the basements of the buildings.

TEPCO’s recent assessment of the effectiveness of the frozen soil wall came after temperatures around the structure dropped to below zero following work that began last August to freeze the remaining final section of the wall.

But experts pointed out that the utility’s assessment is based on figures only when there was little rain.

The water volume rose to 1,000 tons or so a day in late October when two typhoons struck the area.

TEPCO believes that the surge at that time is largely attributable to the downpours from the typhoons.

Heavy rain accumulated in the basement after flowing down holes in the ceilings caused by hydrogen explosions during the 2011 triple meltdown.

It costs more than 1 billion yen a year in electricity fees to keep the wall frozen.

The company plans to remove all the groundwater from the buildings by 2020 so that it can begin work to decontaminate the facilities later.

http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201803020042.html

1.This Month

This page has a very useful “SEARCH” function. If you scroll down the right side panel you can use either the categories listed, or the “Search” slot. Type in a name or a place or topic on this slot, and it’s easy to find a related post.

Changing climate change“2040” paints an optimistic picture of the future of the environment

The film focuses on technological and agricultural solutions that are already being implemented to help combat climate change, The Economist Feb 19th 2019

by C.G. | BERLIN ……….In “2040”, a documentary which premiered at the Berlinale, Mr Gameau seeks to wrest hope from the bleak reports of climate change. He was inspired by Project Drawdown, the first comprehensive plan to reverse global warming, and the film is intended as a “virtual letter to his four-year-old daughter to show her an alternative future”. “Many films,” Mr Gameau thinks, are too dystopian, and “paint a future that is really hard to engage and to connect with”. “2040” acknowledges that the Earth has set off down a hazardous path, but focuses on the work that is being done now to steer the right course. What, the film asks, could make 2040 a time worth living in?…. (subscribers only) https://www.economist.com/prospero/2019/02/19/2040-paints-an-optimistic-picture-of-the-future-of-the-environment

of the week

Join Red Cross and say no to nuclear weapons

Radiation concerns at Grand Canyon

Pr Busby on children’s heart attacks caused by radiation in Fukushima

Radiation sickness in Japan from Fukushima exposure after disaster 2-6-2019

Arctic Blue-Ocean-Event Consequences for Greenland: 1 of 2

WOW Fukushima may be MUCH worse than they are telling us

nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope