Ruthenium 106 investigation update 12 Dec 2017. Who is lying and why?
Jan Haverkamp
Yesterday at 08:30 · 2 Feb 2018
#Russia expert claims #Mayak excluded as source of #Ruthenium emission. Questions:
1. Why is this only published in Russian?
2. Why is there no reaction from the @iaeaorg?
3. Can we get overview of measurement data of Ru-106 and Ru103?
Still not convinced.
Эксперт пояснил, почему исключается гипотеза о выбросе рутения с “Маяка”
РИА Новости
https://ria.ru/atomtec/20180201/1513814257.html
Exclusive to nuclear-news.net
Europe blames Russia and Russia blames Europe but could the release have come from somewhere else?
The story behind Ru 106 that is given little attention is the fact that it is quite an aggressive isotope that is used mainly in the manufacture of medical isotopes. Its nature is to become very volatile when heated and exposed to air. Then Ru 106 becomes both oxidized which deposits on surfaces and also is lofted into the air in a pure gaseous version. The deposited oxidized version then over time becomes gaseous (which might explain the weeks that the Ru 106 was being sampled in the air.
The main areas of interest to most people is where did it come from? What is a likely source?
After some research I was drawn to the Hungarian nuclear Ruthenium 106 experiments which have run since 2002 (and possibly before) that were…
View original post 1,487 more words
1 Comment »
Leave a Reply
1.This Month
Demystifying Nuclear Power Blog
EVENTS
11 March ONLINE Ten Years Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: Rio de Janeiro International Uranium Film Festival Free Online Screening and Debate.
********
13 – March – Protest – France ROUEN (76) – HAUTE-NORMANDIE – RASSEMBLEMENT] Fukushima plus jamais ça : arrêt du nucléaire civil et militaire
*******
SAFECAST 10TH ANNIVERSARY ONLINE EVENT, SAT. , MARCH 13, 2021
-
Archives
- March 2021 (63)
- February 2021 (271)
- January 2021 (278)
- December 2020 (230)
- November 2020 (297)
- October 2020 (392)
- September 2020 (349)
- August 2020 (351)
- July 2020 (280)
- June 2020 (293)
- May 2020 (251)
- April 2020 (273)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
No Russia is actually right. They are NOT involved. Here is the truth https://florentpirotblog.wordpress.com/2018/01/13/arsenals-explosions-in-ukraine-depleted-uranium-contamination-risk-kalinovka-balakliia-kalinovka-explosion-as-explanation-for-fission-products-in-europe-in-autumn-2017/