nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Ruthenium 106 investigation update 12 Dec 2017. Who is lying and why?

Jan Haverkamp
Yesterday at 08:30 · 2 Feb 2018
Twitter
#Russia expert claims #Mayak excluded as source of #Ruthenium emission. Questions:
1. Why is this only published in Russian?
2. Why is there no reaction from the @iaeaorg?
3. Can we get overview of measurement data of Ru-106 and Ru103?
Still not convinced.
Эксперт пояснил, почему исключается гипотеза о выбросе рутения с “Маяка”
РИА Новости
https://ria.ru/atomtec/20180201/1513814257.html

arclight2011part2's avatarnuclear-news

Screenshot from 2017-12-12 05:23:28

Exclusive to nuclear-news.net

Europe blames Russia and Russia blames Europe but could the release have come from somewhere else?

The story behind Ru 106 that is given little attention is the fact that it is quite an aggressive isotope that is used mainly in the manufacture of medical isotopes. Its nature is to become very volatile when heated and exposed to air. Then Ru 106 becomes both oxidized which deposits on surfaces and also is lofted into the air in a pure gaseous version. The deposited oxidized version then over time becomes gaseous (which might explain the weeks that the Ru 106 was being sampled in the air.

The main areas of interest to most people is where did it come from? What is a likely source?

After some research I was drawn to the Hungarian nuclear Ruthenium 106 experiments which have run since 2002 (and possibly before) that were…

View original post 1,487 more words

February 3, 2018 - Posted by | Uncategorized

1 Comment »


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

« Previous | Next »