NRC says there is no health effect in the area below 20mSv/y! Is it scientifically proved? 福島民報に２０ｍＳｖ以下は健康影響なしと報道！　それは科学的なデーターに基づいている判断？

Sunday, 10 November 2013

http://fukushimaappeal.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/nrc-says-there-is-no-health-effect-in.html

(Source) pic.twitter.com/hZV6eWqgdK
(Translation by Mia)
The Nuclear Regulatory Agency is preparing a report on the safety measurement to publish within this month. Fukushima Minpo newspaper reported that they set to announce that there is no health effect in the area that is below 20mSv/y.
(Editor’s note: 20mSv/y is for nuclear workers according to the ICRP standard. 1mSv/y has been international standard for citizens according ICRP that was based on the data of Hiroshima/Nagasaki nuclear bombs victims. Is there any scientific data that says 20mSv/y is safe? )
———————————————————–

Mr. Kosako who had been well respected professor and was the advisor to the former Prime Minister, resigned in protest at the government’s decision of 20mSv/y in 2011, saying that it went completely against his ethics as a scientist and a grandparent. …

In Chernobyl, nobody has to live in areas where the radiation level is more than 5mSv/y unless they want to. In Japan, the government had been appling the ICRP model for emergency situations as a normal one after the disaster in 2011, and had been treats 20mSv/y areas as safe places to live so they do not have to evacuate people from such areas. We shouldn’t allow this false sense of security to remain unchallenged, otherwise it could be foisted on the rest of the world as well.

http://fukushimaappeal.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/normal-0-0-2-false-false-false-en-us-ja_07.html

In 2008, the average dose in heavily contaminated

territories of Belarus, Ukraine and European Russia

exceeded 1 mSv/y

—primarily from eating locally

contaminated food. However, the administration of

apple-pectin food additives is considered helpful for

body decontamination of

137 Cs. Between 1996 and 2007, 160 000 Belarussian children received pectin food additives for 18–25 days

137 Cs levels decreased by 30–40 %. Special protective measures in connection

with agriculture, forestry, hunting and fishing will be

necessary to protect the health of people in radioac-tively contaminated territories for many generations……..

http://wonkythinking.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Fairlie-review.pdf

November 11, 2013 - Posted by arclight2011part2 | Uncategorized

1 Comment »

Radiation Maps of Children of Belarus

Children Radiation Maps, Blog by Jan Hemmer April 14, 2012 by Mikkai
妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ On April 5th I went to BELRAD Institute (http://belrad-institute.org/) in Belarus (got 72% of the Chernobyl fallout), with a friend and translator, to get important data about their work. Here I present with the permission of vice director Mr. Babenko of BELRAD, the Children radiation maps of Belarus . First, some background on the data: We see here 17 regions of Belarus:

Irradiated areas and relatively “CLEAN” areas. Children have Cesium in their bodies, no matter if they live in “clean” or irradiated areas. This is one important fact these maps show. Why is that? The average irradiated soil in Belarus is: 1 – 40 Curie per square kilometer (= 37,000 – 1,480,000 becquerel per m²) of radionuclides, such as Cesium 137, Strontium 90, Americium 241 and other radionuclides. It reaches also 160 Curie per km², although it is 40 on official maps, but reaches 18,500,000 becquerel per m² in some places. Here is more info: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/japanese-children-cancer-outlook-children-need-absolutely-clean-food/ Here is a list of the radionuclides: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Primary%20Radionuclides.gif

Caesium 137, food, children, apple pectin:http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/smw-Galina_Bandazhevskaya.pdf

Nesterenko, founder of BELRAD: “Children receive the highest doses, because the dose coefficients, in a 3 year old child, are 5 times higher than in adults.“

But the Children Radiation Maps are based upon Whole Body Counter measurments of Children, measuring Cesium 137. They are the latest maps available by Belrad. More Info:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/02/mother-how-much-radiation-%E3%81%8A%E6%AF%8D%E3%81%95%E3%82%93%EF%BC%81%E3%81%A9%E3%81%AE%E3%81%8F%E3%82%89%E3%81%84%E3%81%AE%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E7%B7%9A%EF%BC%9F-2/

Not even world’s biggest nuclear-reactor-children-cancer study (KIKK) counts in INTERNAL radiation: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/german-kikk-study-higher-cancer-risc-next-to-atomic-power-plants-unofficial-belarussian-children-cancer-data/ They only measure EXTERNAL radiation. No known children cancer study is interested in INTERNAL emitters, although 70 – 90% of radiation comes from food today. THE WORLD HAS TO LEARN FROM BELARUS. If the focus is set only to external radiation, is seen only radiation in water and air, only milli sievert is discussed. Clean city, irradiated food. No children cancer study I know is interested in internal emitters. We can not afford this failure a 2nd time. This is not mere methodology. This is survival.

FURTHER BELOW ARE THE MAPS:….. http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

Radiation Maps of Children of Belarus

Comment by arclight2011part2 | November 12, 2013 | Reply

nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope