The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

South Carolina’s $9 billion nuclear fiasco – another legal saga develops, criminal investigation coming

3 years later: How the fallout from SC’s $9 billion nuclear fiasco continues   Post and Courier,  By Avery G. Wilks and Andrew Brown, Jul 31, 2020

     It has been three years since two of South Carolina’s largest electric utilities abandoned their $9 billion effort to build two nuclear reactors, but the legal, political and financial consequences continue to ripple across the Palmetto State.

The scuttled V.C. Summer expansion in Fairfield County is now widely considered one of the biggest business failures in the state’s history. The announcement of the project’s cancellation on July 31, 2017, shook South Carolina’s power industry, state government and business community.

The two homegrown S.C. utilities that partnered on the project were thrown into disarray. Investigations were initiated by state lawmakers, financial regulators and federal law enforcement officials.

The state and federal court systems were flooded overnight with lawsuits by investors, ratepayers, construction workers and lenders. The state regulatory system that backed the project for nearly a decade was called into question.

And more than 1.7 million utility customers with S.C. Electric & Gas, Santee Cooper and the state’s 19 local electric cooperatives realized they might be forced to pay billions of dollars more for a power plant that will never produce a watt of electricity.

Much has changed since Santee Cooper and SCE&G’s leaders suddenly announced the project’s collapse. But the saga isn’t over quite yet. Here is a breakdown of where things stand. 

What happened to SCE&G?

The project’s collapse sent SCE&G, an investor-owned utility and the project’s majority owner, into a tailspin. The stock price of its parent company, Cayce-based SCANA Corp., plummeted with the launch of legislative and criminal investigations into the project’s failure, not to mention a flurry of lawsuits against the company from ratepayers and shareholders.

The 175-year-old utility tried to make amends by offering a $5-a-month rate cut, only slightly reducing the $27 a month the typical residential customer was paying in higher power bills for the failed project. State lawmakers rejected that idea almost immediately, calling the meager offer insulting.

Some of SCE&G’s top executives soon left the company amid calls for their resignations.

To save the company and its stockholders, SCE&G’s leaders agreed to allow Dominion Energy to buy the company.

It took over a year for Dominion, an investor-owned utility based in Virginia, to seal that deal. But eventually, the Legislature and state regulators approved of the takeover.

Dominion officially took over SCE&G and SCANA in January 2019. The purchase turned SCE&G into Dominion Energy South Carolina and cut the utility’s nuclear-bloated rates.

But it also left its roughly 720,000 electric ratepayers on the hook to pay another $2.3 billion more for the project over the next two decades.

What about Santee Cooper?

Santee Cooper’s reputation was severely tarnished by the project’s failure. Longtime CEO Lonnie Carter announced his retirement less than a month after the project’s demise, and Gov. Henry McMaster soon called on state lawmakers to sell the debt-saddled utility.

Scrutiny of the state-owned power and water provider revealed problems beyond V.C. Summer, including poor business deals, a toxic relationship with its largest customer, and several executive compensation plans that have drawn the ire of state lawmakers.

Earlier this year, the General Assembly considered a bid from Florida-based NextEra Energy to purchase and privatize Santee Cooper, which has existed for 86 years. But that offer came with its own problems, including the possibility of higher rates for customers.

As it stands now, South Carolina lawmakers have not chosen to sell Santee Cooper. NextEra is still waiting in the wings. But many lawmakers have turned their attention to reforming the public utility so it doesn’t repeat its mistakes.

Moncks Corner-based Santee Cooper has submitted its own ideas to lawmakers for how to remake itself. It’s new executive team has laid out a plan to cut its operating costs and dramatically change its power system by adding more renewable energy.

The debate over the future of Santee Cooper, however, will likely continue into next year.

How much am I paying for the VC Summer project?

Dominion Energy South Carolina customers have already paid about $2 billion in the form of higher power bills for the scuttled project — thanks to nine rate hikes levied on customers while the reactors were still under construction.

Even with the lower rates that Dominion provided, former SCE&G ratepayers will continue to pay another $2.3 billion to cover the project’s debt — plus a tidy profit for Dominion — over the next 20 years.

Meanwhile, about 5 percent of Santee Cooper’s residential power bills is still attributable to the V.C. Summer project. The same goes for customers of South Carolina’s 20 electric cooperatives, which buy three-fifths of Santee Cooper’s power.

For Santee Cooper’s average residential customer, that portion of the power rates equals roughly $6.50 per month.

That rate will continue as Santee Cooper pays off its remaining $3.6 billion in nuclear-related bond debt over at least the next 12 years, a utility spokeswoman said.

Santee Cooper’s rates won’t rise any further for at least four years. The utility’s leaders agreed to reduce its expenses in order to handle any additional operational costs over that time period.

What about the criminal investigation of the project’s failure?

It’s heating up.

Federal prosecutors and investigators who have spent nearly three years probing the V.C. Summer venture got their first guilty plea earlier this month. Former SCANA chief operating officer Steve Byrne admitted in court to being part of a larger conspiracy to conceal important information about the project’s flaws from regulators and the public in order to keep the construction effort alive.

Byrne acknowledged that his actions defrauded SCE&G customers of billions of dollars in higher rates. Prosecutors revealed Byrne — who directly oversaw the project — has been cooperating with their investigation for about a year, providing valuable insights in their search for proof of criminal actions.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in South Carolina also indicated more charges are coming, going so far as to quote sworn testimony from former SCANA CEOs Kevin Marsh and Jimmy Addison in court filings detailing the future of the investigation.

And don’t forget — as a result of the federal investigation, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has sued the company, Marsh and Byrne — alleging they “repeatedly deceived” investors and regulators by hiding the project’s mounting flaws.

That lawsuit is on hold as the criminal probe unfolds.

Which lawsuits have been resolved?

Two huge ratepayer lawsuits against SCE&G and Santee Cooper have been settled, and so has one shareholder lawsuit against SCANA………..

What legal disputes haven’t been resolved?

One of the biggest disputes that Dominion still needs to resolve, as the new owner of SCE&G, is its potential tax liability with the South Carolina government……..



August 1, 2020 - Posted by | business and costs, legal, secrets,lies and civil liberties, USA

1 Comment »

  1. […] South Carolina’s $9 billion nuclear fiasco – another legal saga develops, criminal investigation… […]

    Pingback by South Carolina’s $9 billion nuclear fiasco – another legal saga develops, criminal investigation coming | dickstormprobizblog's Blog | October 1, 2021 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: