Brunswick Nuke Plant: STATE OF EMERGENCY — flying cuttlefish picayune

Duke Energy’s Brunswick nuclear plant, about 30 miles south of Wilmington, has declared a state of emergency as the 1,200-acre complex remains cut off by flood waters and and is inaccessible to outside personnel. – Zero Hedge

via Brunswick Nuke Plant: STATE OF EMERGENCY — flying cuttlefish picayune

3 Comments »

Note – updates and additional items are in the comment to the post. They are getting some new workers in by boat.

Comment by flyingcuttlefish | September 19, 2018 | Reply
THE WORST COGNITIVE DISSONANCE POSSIBLE
What will you see at that site? Vote Trump. What does trump support?
1. Subsidizing and keeping old beat up reactors open.
2. Subsidizing coal fire as coal plants dump tons of radium, thorium, radium, and polonium into the air, water and food.
3. Encouraging and subsidizing fracking that comtaminates major water supplies with radium and uranium
4. Trump wants to start a nuclear space wars branch to the armed forces
5. TRUMP SUPPORTS ABE WHO IS OPENING OLD DAMAGED-REACTORS IN EARQUAKE, TYPHOON RIDDEN JAPAN. ABE IS SHIPPING RADIOACTIVE FOOD AROUND THE WORLD

6.What do these trump conservatives plan do to about nuclear reactors and nuclear waste sites, like the burning dump in st louis filled with radioactive garbage ? Well. They do not want to do anything. Thats socialism in their book .

The reactor subsidizing, the subsidizing of billionaire hedge funds for nuke space weapons and tactical nukes is socialism to the rich. Thats good socialism to the trump supporters. Anything to clean up nuclear waste to help anyone else especially poor and middle class is evil socialism.

“What Will Persuade Conservatives to do something about nuclear?” The same things that would persuade us to fight plate tectonics, entropy and the 2nd law of thermodynamics”

This is their standard retort to anything they deem unnecessary in their book.

They will do nothing. The reactors will just all miraculously close because, they are uneconomical in one breath. Then trump and the republicans are subsidizing old reactors and reasearch on new ones, in another breath..
They will do nothing about the giganic amount of nuclear waste created by their corporate buddies. Huge criminal nuclear waste problems, that their buddies walked away from and left precariously to sit, for more major accidents.
That would be socialism.

What is it Somethimg that coopted fukushima and the nuclear madness for politics.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/heres-youtube-became-powerful-far-right-propaganda-machine/

Comment by Charlene | September 20, 2018 | Reply
THE WORST COGNITIVE DISSONANCE POSSIBLE
What will you see at that site? Vote Trump. What does trump support?
1. Subsidizing and keeping old beat up reactors open.
2. Subsidizing coal fire as coal plants dump tons of radium, thorium, radium, and polonium into the air, water and food.
3. Encouraging and subsidizing fracking that comtaminates major water supplies with radium and uranium
4. Trump wants to start a nuclear space wars branch to the armed forces
5. TRUMP SUPPORTS ABE WHO IS OPENING OLD DAMAGED-REACTORS IN EARQUAKE, TYPHOON RIDDEN JAPAN. ABE IS SHIPPING RADIOACTIVE FOOD AROUND THE WORLD
6.What do these trump conservatives plan do to about nuclear reactors and nuclear waste sites, like the burning dump in st louis filled with radioactive garbage ? Well. They do not want to do anything. Thats socialism in their book .

The reactor subsidizing, the subsidizing of billionaire hedge funds for nuke space weapons and tactical nukes is socialism to the rich. Thats good socialism to the trump supporters. Anything to clean up nuclear waste to help anyone else especially poor and middle class is evil socialism.

“What Will Persuade Conservatives to do something about nuclear?” The same things that would persuade us to fight plate tectonics, entropy and the 2nd law of thermodynamics”

This is their standard retort to anything they deem unnecessary in their book.

They will do nothing. The reactors will just all miraculously close because, they are uneconomical in one breath. Then trump and the republicans are subsidizing old reactors and reasearch on new ones, in another breath..
They will do nothing about the giganic amount of nuclear waste created by their corporate buddies. Huge criminal nuclear waste problems, that their buddies walked away from and left precariously to sit, for more major accidents.
That would be socialism to regulate radioactive fracking pollution. To deal with all nuclear waste safely and meticulously. To slow down and stop nuclear weapons production. To stop subsidizing and dangerous nuclear reactors or radiation sources like coal fire. To begin implementing renewables now! And don’t give us your lying bullshit that it cannot be done. We know what that is about . It is socialism for your rich wall street buddies, millionaire and billionaire, corporate hacks and scourge like trump.and his moronic family.

What is it. Somethimg that coopted fukushima and the nuclear madness for politics.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/heres-youtube-became-powerful-far-right-propaganda-machine/

Comment by Charlene | September 20, 2018 | Reply

1.This Month

“Lessons from Fukushima” booklet, available in 14 languages.

of the week

Gender and Radiation Impact Project

Tri-Valley CAREs – Communities Against a Radioactive Environment

3 Reasons Why Nuclear Energy Is Terrible! 2/3

Pros and cons of public opinion polls – Jason Robert Jaffe

What About the Ozone Hole | Global Weirding

For First Time, Majority in U.S. Oppose Nuclear Energy, Gallup, BY REBECCA RIFFKIN , March 18, 2016,

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

54% of Americans oppose nuclear energy, 44% in favor
First time in Gallup’s trend that majority oppose nuclear energy
Both major parties less likely to favor nuclear energy than in 2015

WASHINGTON, D.C. — For the first time since Gallup first asked the question in 1994, a majority of Americans say they oppose nuclear energy. The 54% opposing it is up significantly from 43% a year ago, while the 44% who favor using nuclear energy is down from 51%.

Gallup asks Americans as part of its annual Environment poll if they favor or oppose the use of nuclear energy as one way to provide electricity. Each year from 2004 to 2015, a majority of Americans said they favored the use of nuclear energy, including a high of 62% in 2010.

In 2011, Gallup conducted its annual Environment poll a few days before the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster in Japan, and at that time, 57% of Americans were in favor of nuclear energy. The next time the question was asked in 2012, a similar majority still favored the use of nuclear energy.

And although there have not been any major nuclear incidents since Fukushima in 2011, a majority of U.S. adults now oppose nuclear energy. This suggests that energy prices and the perceived abundance of energy sources are the most relevant factors in attitudes toward nuclear power, rather than safety concerns prompted by nuclear incidents.

Lower gasoline prices over the past year are likely driving greater opposition toward the use of nuclear power. As Americans have paid less at the pump, their level of worry about the nation’s energy situation has dropped to 15-year-low levels. This appears to have resulted in more Americans prioritizing environmental protection and fewer backing nuclear power as an alternative energy source.

Democrats and Republicans Less Likely to Favor Nuclear Energy

Republicans continue to be more likely than Democrats and independents to be in favor of nuclear energy. Still, support for the use of nuclear energy among Republicans and Democrats has declined in comparison to 2015. A slight majority of Republicans, 53%, are in favor of nuclear energy, down significantly from 68% last year. One in three Democrats, 34%, favor it, down from 42% in 2015. Independents’ support is essentially unchanged from last year, but is down from the high Gallup found in 2010……..

Survey Methods

Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted March 2-6, 2016, with a random sample of 1,019 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.

Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 60% cellphone respondents and 40% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods. https://news.gallup.com/poll/190064/first-time-majority-oppose-nuclear-energy.aspx

EVENTS

November-December 2018 International Uranium Film Festival – U.S. Southwest tour

November 29th and 30th and December 1st, Navajo Nation Museum, Hwy 264 & Post Office Loop, Window Rock, Navajo Nation, AZ

December 2nd, Flagstaff, AZ

December 6th, Guild Cinema, 3405 Central Ave, Albuquerque, NM

December 7th, Grants, NM

December 9th, Jean Cocteau Cinema, 418 Montezuma Ave, Santa Fe, NM

PETITIONS

Tell Congress: Stop Trump from ordering a nuclear first strike without a Congressional declaration of war.

PREVENT UNNECESSARY RADIOACTIVE RISKS ACROSS THE USA NATION

Protect Idaho’s water. Stop nuclear waste.

nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope