NOAA vs Mail on Sunday — CLIMATE FACT CHECK

potholer54

Published on 9 Feb 2017

SOURCES:

0:00 — http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetec…

0.09 – http://www.nationalreview.com/article…

0:20 — “Possible artefacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus” Karl et. Al, Science 2015

0:42 — https://science.house.gov/news/press-…

1:20 —https://twitter.com/RozPidcock?ref_sr…

3:39 — Why don’t they adjust the ship data down? Because it makes absolutely no difference to the result but takes a lot more man hours. I wrote to Dr. Zeke Hausfather with this question and he replied: “NOAA adjusted buoys up to match the ship record in version 4 of their ocean temperature record simply because ships make up 90% of our ocean record, with buoys only available in recent years. In response to folks getting confused about this, NOAA will be adjusting ships down to buoys in their upcoming version 5, but this makes no difference on the resulting temperature trends.”

4:13 – “Extended Reconstruction Sea Surface Temperature Version 4 (ERSSTv4). Part 1: Upgrades and Intercomparisons” – Huang et al, Journal of the American Meteorological Society 2015

6:00 — David Rose’s previously challenged “quote” was from Murari Lal in 2010.

6:10 — https://judithcurry.com/2017/02/04/cl…

7:18 — http://www.eenews.net/climatewire/201…

7:32 — http://staging.hosted.ap.org/dynamic/…

8:38 – “Assessing recent warming using instrumentally homogeneous sea surface temperature records” – Hausfather et al., Science 2017

9:30 — https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck…