The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

In total denial of the low-dose internal irradiation effects

Another marvelous spin propaganda article minimizing the dangers of the radiation in Fukushima, from the Asahi Shimbun.

If you watch that press conference from the beginning to the end, you may have different impression about their work. They do not pay any attention to the effect of the low-dose internal irradiation. Such omission being very convenient to promote the fallacy that life in Fukushima is very safe.



Haruka Onodera, a third-year student at Fukushima High School, holds a news conference with University of Tokyo professor Ryugo Hayano at the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of Japan in Tokyo on Feb. 8.


Fukushima students reach out to tell truth about radiation

Struck by ignorance about the 2011 nuclear disaster, high school science club members in Fukushima Prefecture enlisted the help of fellow students around Japan and abroad for a comparative study on radiation doses.

The results surprised even those living in the prefecture that hosts the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant.

“The individual doses (of external radiation exposure in high school students) were almost equal inside and outside of Fukushima Prefecture, and in European areas,” Haruka Onodera, 18, said in English at the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of Japan (FCCJ) in Tokyo on Feb. 8.

A German correspondent asked her, “Would you declare Fukushima now safe?”

“Actually, we didn’t measure the doses in people living in the contaminated areas, so we can’t say all of Fukushima is safe,” Onodera answered, often pausing in thought in the middle of her words and phrases. “But I hope we will send (personal dosimeters) to contaminated areas and help do risk management for people living there in the future.”

Onodera, a third-year student of Fukushima High School and member of the physics and radiation division of the school’s Super Science Club, also showed explanatory slides at the FCCJ news conference titled, “Fukushima and radiation monitoring. The goal of the project is to show the realities of Fukushima Prefecture to the rest of the world.

The club’s physics and radiation division started the project in summer 2014. It involved 216 high school students and teachers in Japan and abroad carrying personal dosimeters for two weeks.

Six high schools in Fukushima Prefecture–Fukushima, Adachi, Aizu Gakuho, Iwaki, Asaka and Tamura–and another six located elsewhere in Japan–including in Gifu, Kanagawa, Nara and Hyogo prefectures–were involved in the project.

They were joined by 14 high schools from France, Poland and Belarus.

According to the measurements taken by the students, the annual radiation doses in Fukushima Prefecture ranged between 0.63 and 0.97 millisievert. For elsewhere in Japan, the range was from 0.55 to 0.87 millisievert, while in Europe, the annual doses were between 0.51 and 1.1 millisieverts.

The similar levels of external doses are believed to be partly attributable to the lower level of natural background radiation in Fukushima Prefecture compared with that in western Japan. That finding came from an analysis of a database on the radioactive content of soil in areas surrounding the different high schools across Japan.

Onodera, who was seated next to Ryugo Hayano, a professor of physics with the University of Tokyo, at the FCCJ news conference, had also presented the study results last year to a workshop of high school students in France and a conference on Fukushima foodstuffs held on the sidelines of an international food exposition in Italy.

Two second-year students of the Super Science Club–Minori Saito, 17, and Yuya Fujiwara, 17–gave a talk at a workshop organized in Date, Fukushima Prefecture, by the International Commission on Radiological Protection late last year.

First- and second-year students who are members of the club, joined by eight high school students from France, visited peach farmers and shiitake mushroom growers in Fukushima Prefecture in summer last year. It was part of a program for studying the current state of Fukushima from diverse views.

The students wanted to address global audiences after they were shocked by how little was known about the actual state of Fukushima Prefecture.

“Can humans live in Fukushima?” a French high school student asked the Fukushima students over Skype as part of an international exchange program in 2014.

That prompted the Japanese students to determine the actual situation on their own, and compare it with circumstances elsewhere in Japan and abroad. Hayano advised them to undertake the endeavor when he visited Fukushima High School to give a talk.

The findings of the study were surprising. Most of the Fukushima students expected the doses in Fukushima would be the highest, even by a large margin.

The students also studied how behavior affected the dose levels.

The Fukushima High School students were being exposed to lower radiation levels when they were at school than when they were at home. They believe the school’s concrete buildings provided a more effective shield from radiation sources than the wooden houses did.

By contrast, students attending Ena High School in Gifu Prefecture were exposed to more radiation when they were at school, where granite, containing radiation sources, is used in the buildings.

Their analysis results were published in November in a British scientific journal on radiological protection. Onodera was involved in writing the research paper.

“The experience has brought home to me how important it is to address reality objectively and scientifically,” she said.

Onodera said she was growing more interested in basic sciences and dreams of doing research on molecular biology at university.

“We hope to solicit help from people in evacuation zones within Fukushima Prefecture, and from high schools in countries we have yet to address, in further broadening our study,” said Takashi Hara, a teacher and adviser to the science club’s physics and radiation division.


April 4, 2016 - Posted by | Fukushima 2016 | , ,


  1. People ask how can the high emissions at naraha be translated into palpable numbers that people can understand and if you cannot see it smell it or taste it how is it effecting people?

    You can see emissions at fukushima. High emissions. I have collected many of webcam photos of the craziest stuff you can concieve in the five years since the catastrophe at the fuku daichi site. Dancing lights of zombie radiation. So flipping radioactive the external radiation would kill ya in minutes.

    There are all the pictures of the bombs going off and the accompanying devastation. People burned to death, people with awful burns, mutations, people who absorbed radionucleides and got cancer.

    I was once a dosimetry tech at a nuclear complex. I passed out radiation badges at the complex as a summer job. The badges were gathered monthly. We knew the radiation shown by the badges was the same as the radiation in the bombs that fried people in nagasaki and hiroshima. The bosses did not hide that from us. What the bosses failed to tell us was that the true danger at the complex was the danger that we were absorbing the shit in our lungs the food we ate and through our skin, not from any external radiation the badges picked up.

    Bioaccumulation of ultraminute amounts of radiotoxins is what really kills ya when radionucleides has are about. The geiger counters just show theres a lot of them there. You cannot see smell or touch lead , arsenic, dioxins, mercury or  tetravalent chromium in water and food yet they kill ya maim ya in small quantities.

    Radioactive cesium is a million times more toxic than the latter poisons of lead, arsenic etc.  There is so much cesium137 from chernobyl spread around in belarus now that 85 % of of the kids in belarus have heart defects in a country of 10 million.

    Cesium 137 has  a halflife of 30 years along w strontium90 which leads to guarenteed bone marrow abnormalities at.00000000075 gm/kg.  Plutonium and uranium other radionucleides have much larger halflives and varying toxicities based on their physiological targeting.

    Cesium 137 is extremely cardiotoxic.  It is the predominant element at narah. It is toxic to .00000000035 gm per kilogram and there is enough in tokyo now to kill everyone in 5 years. you can pick it up with a geiger counter or scinillometer. you cannot pickup lead or arsenic chrom mercury except with a mass spectrometer.
    One can measure radionucleides in mass spectrometers too. Cesium 137 can be converted from curies and bg using the simple calculation of 900 curies per gm of cesium137. Dr Conrad miller came up with the cardiotoxic dose of accumulated cesium 137 after exhaustive studies in belarus.

    Dr. Miller explains how if a person eats food on a regular basis that is contaminated with as little as 10 Bq/Kg, it accumulates in the body and is NOT excreted quickly as the pro nuclear advocates claim. Instead the Cesium for example, builds up over time until the levels reach 1,400 Bq/Kg in as little as 3 years. 

    It only takes 10 Bq/Kg in the human body to cause health problems according to Dr. Miller, and 50 Bq/Kg will cause irreversible lesions and heart problems.

    An instant exposure to iodine 131 which is short lived leads to cancer or thryroid abnormalities. I 131 is also used to kill thryroid gland in people who have goiters and thyroid cancer and they know exactly how much it takes.  Go figure.

    Comment by ted | April 5, 2016 | Reply

  2. Reblogged this on A Green Road Daily News.

    Comment by A Green Road Project | April 5, 2016 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: