Mainstream media did not report dangers of flooding to UK’s Drigg nuclear waste site
NEW YEARS EVE NUCLEAR WASTE SITE FLOOD ALERT VIRTUALLY UNREPORTED http://www.celticleague.net/news/new-years-eve-nuclear-waste-site-flood-alert-virtually-unreported/ NEWS FROM THE CELTIC LEAGUE, 6 Jan 16
Our thanks to Albert Froon in the UK for posting us details of the attached article from ‘The Ecologist’ which was published on New Years Eve and warns of possible dangers from flooding at the Drigg nuclear waste site near Sellafield.
We have in the past highlighted the dangers posed by the drainage inadequacies of the main Sellafield site and the possibility of breaching of the River Calder which flows through the site (see links):
https://www.celticleague.net/news/heavy-rain-in-cumbria-wash-day-at-sellafield/
https://www.celticleague.net/news/enviroment-agency-responds-on-sellafield-drainage-issue/#respond
However in this case as you will see The Ecologist also highlights a UK Environment Agency alert about the River Irt which is adjacent to Drigg described as a nuclear waste repository. Basically however it’s simply a ‘nuclear landfill site’ and it’s probably no exaggeration to say that in its early years very little accurate record of what was disposed there was kept (see link):
You will also see in the article that Cumbrian environment campaigners ‘Radiation Free Lakeland’ sum the issue up succinctly in a letter to Cumbria County Council asking for Drigg’s gates to be locked to any more nuclear waste given the dangers from flood waters entering the site, eroding the landfill and contaminating land, river and sea with radioactive waste.
“To describe the UKs nuclear waste site as a ‘Repository’ is putting a spin on the UKs main nuclear dump for ‘low level’ waste”, the letter states.
“There is controlled discharge direct to the Irish Sea not to mention run off to the Drigg Stream and River Irt.
“Discharges to the air of radioactive gases are ongoing. According to the British Geological Society the Drigg site is above a regional aquifer. It is also likely to be destroyed by coastal erosion in 500 to 5,000 years (computer modelling can be wrong either way). Much of the waste is long lived and high risk.”
There is no doubt that the increasing frequency of storm and flood events in Cumbria pose a danger of sudden and irreversible pollution of the North Irish Sea area.
Meanwhile what are the Manx and Irish governments saying – nothing!
5 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- May 2024 (181)
- April 2024 (366)
- March 2024 (335)
- February 2024 (345)
- January 2024 (375)
- December 2023 (333)
- November 2023 (342)
- October 2023 (366)
- September 2023 (353)
- August 2023 (356)
- July 2023 (362)
- June 2023 (324)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Reblogged this on Radiation Free Lakeland.
Comment by mariannewildart | January 8, 2016 |
I asked a question of RFL ie what is the alternative to nuclear power, if nuclear power is disbanded as you want, you must put forward an alternative, otherwise `no electricity. what of the thousands of people employed by the nuclear industry, have you an alternative for them, all you seem to do is scaremonger with no valid alternatives,
I am not a dyed in the wool nuclear supporter, but I would have to see alternatives before wanting to close Sellafield.
Comment by Anthony James Atkinson | January 10, 2016 |
Alternatives certainly exist. It is not technical lack which prevents them, but the lack of political will to face up to the dangerous nuclear situation. The media does not help by silence, keeping the public unaware of the truth.
Comment by Christina MacPherson | January 11, 2016 |
Sellafield stopped producing electricity in 2003 – all the pylons you see around the site are taking electricty TO Sellafield. As Christine says there are plenty of ways to boil a kettle ( the most important thing about a kettle is the fresh clean unpolluted water in it) There will be jobs in looking after the nuclear waste for eons to come – unless of course it is merely dumped into the environment which is what the industry seem to be doing with “decomissioning”
Comment by Marianne Birkby | December 29, 2016 |
[…] NEW YEARS EVE NUCLEAR WASTE SITE FLOOD ALERT VIRTUALLY UNREPORTED Main Stream Media did not report dangers of flooding to UK’s Drigg Nuclear […]
Pingback by Radiation Free Lakeland | December 29, 2016 |