Fukushima scrub-down aims to make villages safe, although woods may remain no-go zones
All in vain. The next wind, the next rain, coming from those woods will carry accumulated radionuclides from there to re-contaminate those “decontaminated villages.
In the past years, some villages have been decontaminated already up to times, each time always contamination in due time to return to the pre-decontamination levels.
IITATE, FUKUSHIMA PREF. – Sweating inside their plastic protection suits, thousands of men toil in Japan’s muggy early summer in a vast effort to scrub radiation from the villages around Fukushima.
The mission is to decontaminate hundreds of square kilometers that were polluted when reactors went into meltdown after huge tsunami struck the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant in March 2011.
No stone is left unturned: Diggers scrape away the top layer of earth in fields, school courtyards and around the buildings of villages, while houses, buildings, roads and parking lots are scrubbed clean.
At least 20,000 people are involved in the cleanup, according to the Environment Ministry. The workers wear the special gloves, masks and boots required for workers in the nuclear industry.
There are currently around 2.5 million black bags filled with contaminated soil, plants and leaves piled up at the sites or in one of the nearly 800 temporary outdoor storage facilities set up across the disaster zone.
The effort comes as the central government prepares to declare sections of the evacuation zone habitable again.
That will mean evacuees can return to the homes they abandoned more than four years ago. It will also mean, say campaigners, that some people will have no choice but to go back because it will trigger the end of some compensation payments.
Government-run decontamination efforts are underway in 11 cities where Tokyo says that at present, anyone living there would be exposed to radiation levels of more than 20 millisieverts (mSv) a year.
The globally accepted norm for radiation absorption is 1 mSv per year, although the International Atomic Energy Agency and others say anything up to 20 mSv per year poses no immediate danger to human health.
The town of Naraha, which lies just 20 km from the plant, is expected to be declared safe in September.
The government intends to lift many evacuation orders by March 2017, if decontamination progresses as it hopes.
Still, the area immediately surrounding the plant remains uninhabitable, and storage sites meant to last 30 years are being built in the villages closest to the complex.
For now, only residential areas are being cleaned in the short-term, and the worst-hit parts of the countryside are being omitted, as recommended by the IAEA.
But that strategy has troubled environmentalists, who fear that could lead to re-contamination as woodlands will act as radiation reservoirs, with pollutants washed out by rain.
In a report on decontamination in Iitate, a heavily forested area northwest of the plant, the environmental group Greenpeace says these selective efforts will effectively confine returnees to a relatively small area of their old hometowns.
“The Japanese government plans, if implemented, will create an open-air prison of confinement to ‘cleaned’ houses and roads … and the vast untouched radioactive forests continue to pose a significant risk of recontamination of these ‘decontaminated’ areas to even higher levels,” declares the report, published Tuesday.
Some 39 other municipalities that were not evacuated after the meltdowns, and which have radiation levels deemed safe for humans, are also being decontaminated by local authorities.
Source: Japan Times
3 Comments »
Leave a reply to stampeden Cancel reply
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


What is going to happen to the 2.5 million bags full of radiation? Please do not tell me that the Japanese are going to burn them to alleviate their problems while the radiation (which is now airborne) travels to the USA. The Japanese have burned the refuse in the past so I see no problem with them burning again. As with all the problems surrounding Fukushima – there are no solutions.
Stam Peden
Aromas, CA
What is going to happen to the 2.5 million bags of radioactive debris? Please do not tell me that the Japanese are going to burn them. The Japanese have burned them in the past to alleviate their problems. After burning, most of the radiation appears to be gone! Radiation does NOT disappear! In this case, it is simply moving to the USA and around the world. As with all the problems at Fukushima, there are no solutions at the present time.
PLEASE – DO NOT LET THEM BURN – DO NOT LET THEM BURN!
Stam Peden
Aromas, CA
To my knowledge there is already one incinerator in Futaba city, Fukushima in operation since February 2015, incinerating 2,400 tons per day…
They plan to built one incinerator in each of the 23 municipalities of Fukushima.
There are also other incinerators in other prefectures. You cannot find anything about it in the media. The Japanese government is censoring any news about incineration, only talking about compacting and storage, to not alarm public opinion.
On March 2015, during the Paris symposium about Fukushima, I met with few Fukushima antinuclear activists. I was dumbfounded, amazed, surprised, that even themselves living in Fukushima prefecture they did not know, were not aware of that newly constructed incinerator in Futaba city, already in operation since one month then.