The latest in abuse from the pro thorium nuclear trolls

brendan @totterdell91 so aside from promoting outright lies & political bastardry @ChristinaMac1 what other lunacy are you selling

Brendan@totterdell91 Personally I believe your anti nuclear phobias have made you into a bitter twisted & seriously evil, duplicitous individual @ChristinaMac1

John Randall@thjr19 @ChristinaMac1 Nuclear power has as much in common with A bombs as fire has with incendiary bombs. So, you & I should start a campaign, OK?.

John Randall@thjr19 You don’t give a rat’s rear-end about anybody’s future @ChristinaMac1, all you see is your tiny bigoted little world. Put up or shut up.

John Randall @thjr19 @ChristinaMac1 . Are you really so stupid? Go away. Go play in your little sandbox.

@JeremyWNA @BenThinkClimate Willacy is our ABC’s version of Helen Caldicott…professional writer of disaster porn. Facts are ‘inconvenient’

February 27, 2014 - Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized

9 Comments »

Thorium is far from an established technology.

Comment by kmcloren | February 27, 2014 | Reply
- From extensive reading that I have done, it seems that thorium technology is about 70 years until actually functioning. That, along with the diseconomics of it, probably explains why the mainstream nuclear apologists and critics generally ignore it.
  Thorium reactors could not have any effect on climate change – especially given that delay.
  But what they could do, is to prolong the “nuclear dream” in the minds of public and governments.
  
  Comment by Christina MacPherson | February 27, 2014 | Reply
john randall started taking the piss out of me as well but has pulled away.. he knows i raid wikileaks everytime him and his JTRIG mates pulls their shit..

any more comments john randall..
the gloves are fff and i have a conversation for you about the money and the cover up of the thorium cycle..

you have my twiiter thing.. lets get it on !!
christina is in her 70`s and all you and your other identities should aim at me , if you want a fair fight..
i know stuff
and i am happy to share it with you..
you will not have to go to the wikileaks site either 🙂 i will do that for you..

looking forward to it..
flame wars!!
banzai!!

Comment by arclight2011part2 | February 27, 2014 | Reply
- Ha ha – why should being “in one’s 70s” make one become a feeble target for John Randall and co?
  What fascinates me is that he and his very small band of pro thrium tweeters seem to do this as a full time job. If you bother to read their stuff , all they do is to regurgitate propaganda about thorium reactors and LFTRs – same old stuff recycled, repeated. Either they are paid to do this, or work in that field, or they are cranks.
  Self-appointed scientific “experts” they take umbrage at anyone else having an opinion. I sometimes ponder if there are mental health problems behind the invective, especially as I would be pretty confident that, particularly Randall’s outbursts, are counter-productive.
  
  Comment by Christina MacPherson | February 27, 2014 | Reply
  - 🙂
    https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
    
    Comment by arclight2011part2 | February 27, 2014
wheres the trolls ?? still waiting??

Comment by arclight2011part2 | February 28, 2014 | Reply
- They have had a few more gos on twitter sometimes on hashtag #thorium, but not usually. They use #thorium to make themselves look “professional”
  
  Comment by Christina MacPherson | February 28, 2014 | Reply
- Thorium “nukular” technology requires Uranium 233.
  
  Long may your site’s trolls be rendered ineffective by your supporters!
  
  Good eye, mate. ‘ave a nice day!
  With Love, from the “terd-world” country called “Candu”.
  
  Comment by Dud | February 28, 2014 | Reply
[…] their opponents and going into massive trollish tirades (a few good examples of this can be found here and here) or resorting to conspiracy theories of the Alex Jones […]

Pingback by With friends like these, who needs enemies! | daryanenergyblog | August 2, 2014 | Reply