nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Nuclear detectors in the USA, a $4 billion rip off just before the Fukushima disaster – information courtesy of Stratfor

“We are mindful of getting something delivered that has a credible basis for the implementation plan that follows,” Homeland Security Deputy Secretary Jane Holl Lute told the Senate Homeland and Governmental Affairs committee

https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/15/1575221_nuclear-detectors-a-4-billion-bust-gao-says-.html

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered “global intelligence” company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor’s web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

Nuclear detectors a $4 billion bust, GAO says

Released on 2013-11-15 00:00 GMT

Email-ID 1575221
Date 2010-09-16 16:23:18
From sean.noonan@stratfor.com
To ct@stratfor.com

Nuclear detectors a $4 billion bust, GAO says
By Jeff Stein September 16, 2010; 5:05 AM ET
http:=
//blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/09/nuclear_bomb_detectors_a_4_bil.h=
tml?wprss=3Dspy-talk

The Department of Homeland Security spent billions of dollars on machines to intercept nuclear terrorists that were too big for border inspection lanes, the Government Accountabiity Office reported Wednesday.

Why? Because during the first year or more of the program,the auditors said, the two DHS units involved — the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office and Customs and Border Protection — had few discussions about operating requirements at ports of entry.

officials said they made it clear to DNDO, the report= said, that they did not want the [nuclear detecting] machines because they would not fit in primary inspections lanes and would slow down the flow of commerce through these lanes and cause significant delays.

Software for the Cargo Advanced Automated Radiography Systems, CAARS, as they are called, also was not up to snuff, the GAO said. Or as the
auditors put it, key part of the machine needed to identify
shielded nuclear materials automatically  did not mature at a
rapid enough = pace to warrant acquisition and deployment.

Moreover, DHS budget proposals also hide the actual status of the
program, the GAO said.

For example, the fiscal years 2010 and 2011 DHS budget
justifications both cited that an ongoing CAARS testing campaign would lead to a cost-benefit analysis,” the report said. “However, DNDO officials told GAO that when they cancelled the acquisition part of the program in 2007, they also decided not to conduct any associated cost benefit analysis.

The leaders of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Committee, Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., and Susan Collins, R-Maine,
slammed the department for not having a strategic plan to develop
critical technology that could prevent a nuclear terrorist attack on the
U.S., the Associated Press reported.

“We’re not happy or satisfied with progress on the whole nuclear detection
architecture,” Lieberman said.

DHS nuclear detection program has been troubled for years,
having spent more than $4 billion since 2003 with nothing to show for it.

DHS said it’s working on it.

“We are mindful of getting something delivered that has a credible basis
for the implementation plan that follows,” Homeland Security Deputy
Secretary Jane Holl Lute told the Senate Homeland and Governmental Affairs committee, the AP reported.

Sean Noonan

Tactical Analyst

Strategic Forecasting, Inc.

http://www.stratfor.com

Advertisement

February 21, 2014 - Posted by | Uncategorized

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: