Seashore studies nuclear effects – PILgrim NPP
SOUTH WELLFLEET — The Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory Commission on Monday will discuss a new report on the economic effects on Cape Cod of a public safety emergency at the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in Plymouth.
A subcommittee of the commission has initiated creation of the report, which was researched and written by a University of Massachusetts Amherst student pursuing a doctorate in economics, according to commission member Maureen Burgess, who represents Truro.
The nine-member commission represents the six Cape Cod towns within the boundaries of the Seashore along with county, state and federal representatives.
The commission wrote to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in March 2012 stating its opposition to the relicensing of Pilgrim because of the potential threat to public safety and the environment.
The commission also created the subcommittee on Pilgrim safety, of which Burgess is a member.
Nuclear regulators approved a 20-year extension of the plant’s license in May 2012.
The new report is not at the level of a peer-review journal article, Burgess said Tuesday. “It’s a preliminary study. The only reason to do it is to try to encourage further public participation, discussion and awareness of the issue.”
An anonymous donation of about $5,000, facilitated by commission alternate member Ted Thomas, of Wellfleet, was used to pay a stipend to the researcher, Burgess said. She declined to give the name of the researcher until the Monday meeting.
The report is based on the ideas that the Cape heavily relies on tourism and real estate and that a potential disaster at the nuclear power plant could affect the region’s main source of revenue, Burgess said. “Anything that impacts tourism would impact visitation to the Seashore,” she said.
The Seashore hosted 4.4 million recreational visitors in 2012, according to the National Park Service.
The meeting is scheduled for 1 p.m. at the Seashore headquarters off Marconi Station Road.
A copy of the 2012 letter the commission wrote to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is at www.nps.gov/caco/parkmgmt/advisory-commission.htm.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- May 2026 (187)
- April 2026 (356)
- March 2026 (251)
- February 2026 (268)
- January 2026 (308)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (376)
- September 2025 (257)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment