The activity concentrations of 137Cs, 134Cs, 90Sr, 238Pu, 239,240Pu, 241Pu and 241Am in soil and in animals causing transgenerationally-transmitted damage
Personal thanks to Jan Hemmer
Japan, listen: “The activity concentrations of 137Cs, 134Cs, 90Sr, 238Pu, 239,240Pu, 241Pu and 241Am in soil and in animals were measured at five monitoring sites with different ground deposition of radionuclides at different distances from the destroyed reactor.
The observed temporal pattern of the radionuclide activity concentration in the studied animal populations reflects the changes in biological availability of these isotopes for biota, mostly due to fuel particle destruction and appearance of dissolved and exchangeable forms of radionuclides.
Maximal values of the whole-body absorbed dose rates occurred during the year of deposition, followed by a decrease in the subsequent period. Generally, this decrease was monotonic, mainly determined by the decrease of the external c-ray dose rate, but there were exceptions due to the delayed maximum of internal exposure.
The inter-individual distributions of radionuclide concentrations and lifetime whole-body absorbed doses were asymmetric and close to log-normal, including concentrations and doses considerably higher than the population mean values.”
http://www.enfants-tchernobyl-belarus.org/extra/pdf-divers/telecharge.php?pdf=etb-037.pdf
Image source ; http://belrad-institute.org/UK/doku.php?id=publications:articles:mesures_of_radiation
“Transgenerational accumulation of radiation damage in small mammals chronically exposed to Chernobyl fallout” PDF:http://www.enfants-tchernobyl-belarus.org/extra/pdf-divers/telecharge.php?pdf=etb-068.pdf“With regard to the continuous buildup of transgenerationally-transmitted damage in the course of chronicradiation exposure of the parental generations, we will shortly speak of the transgenerational accumulation of transmitted biological damage” ignored by World’s Science.
Maps of Belarus:Whole Body Counter Check ups of Children (Cesium 137).
I got these “maps” from BELRAD (http://belrad-institute.org/).Yablokov / Nesterenko showed a few in their famous study “Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment”. Here you can see all of them. I did this article about my trip and the information you can see on them:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/
Detected to Plutonium and Uranium at Takahagi City, Ibaraki Prefecture. 茨城県高萩市
Detected to Plutonium and Uranium 茨城県高萩市 On April 5 2013 We had detected the plutonium and uranium in Takahagi City, Ibaraki Prefecture. Many children has been living also in this city. [[ Special Thanks ]] Yuko Sugimoto
Fukushima report: Plutonium should be in the leakage! 汚染水問題に関する小出先生のコメント、報道するラジオより。 追加報告:プルトニウムも汚染水に混じっているはず! (repost)
Op Ed by Mia (JANUK)
http://fukushimaappeal.blogspot.co.uk/
…..The last one was plutonium241, which had radiation dose about 50 times as much as the total of the other three(PU238, PU239 & PU240)…..
….The underground tanks were meant to store low level of radioactive water after being filtered through ALPS. But they have been using them to store high level of radioactive water (including β (beta) emitting nuclide, Strontium and α (alpha)emitting nuclide, Plutonium)…..
Thursday, 18 April 2013
A MBS radio interview with Prof. Koide: the repeated leaking problems at Fukushima Crippled Plant. Additional report: Plutonium should be in the leakage! 汚染水問題に関する小出先生のコメント、報道するラジオより。 追加報告:プルトニウムも汚染水に混じっているはず!
The most recent report on the leakage problem said that about 22 liters of radioactive water had leaked from gaps between the pipes used to transfer it from underground water storage tank into an another tank, and that the level of radioactivity in the water was 290,000Bq/m3.
Tepco has been trying to get ALPS to work for some time but it’s still in its trial stage. ALPS is supposed to filter 62 radioactive nuclides. However Tepco seems not wanting to mention the α (alpha) emitting nuclide isotopes.
The last one was plutonium241, which had radiation dose about 50 times as much as the total of the other three(PU238, PU239 & PU240).A Plutonium contamination map by MEXT published on 12/8/12.
[…Prefecture – city/town/village – 緯度 latitude – 経度 longitude – PU241(lower limit of detection)-…]
by MEXT on 30/9/11Half life: PU238(88y) decays into PU234(245,000y), PU239(24,100y), PU240(6,600y), PU241(13.2y) decays into Am241(=silver, 433y)Multi-nuclide Removal Equipment (ALPS)
(Reference) http://blog.goo.ne.jp/tarutaru22/e/a8f8b3e66c246ef3c3df8699b3a2ec45http://home.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/er/ReneN_P_P1.html
“….There’s a lot of Pu-241 produced in reactor fuel – more activity
of Pu-241 than any other actinide (with the exception of
short-lived Np-239). The Pu-241 decays to Am-241 and thence
to Np-237 and decay series nuclides, adding to the
radio-toxicity.Given the copious amounts of Pu-241 produced
(on the order of 10^5 curies per ton of fuel)
it shouldn’t surprise anyone that it’s showing up.
It should also be no surprise that potential dose from Pu-241
is higher than from other nuclides since there’s so much
of it produced……”
Leaked TEPCO report: 120 billion Becquerels of plutonium, 7.6 trillion Becquerels of neptunium released in first 100 hours — Media concealed risk to public
Published: October 15th, 2011 at 8:21 pm ET
By ENENews
1 Comment »
Leave a reply to Guest Cancel reply
-
Archives
- December 2025 (293)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS






Watch the video linked below on testing fish for radiation,
and listen how government agencies are passing the buck on testing.
The interviewer asks why gov’t agencies aren’t doing it.
She answers that Ken Buesseler has gone to 5 different agencies.
But “budges are very tight”
And everyone seems to think it’s someone else’s problem ===>
> NOAA says we’re looking at debris, but we don’t look for radiation
> EPA says they cover chemicals but not radioactivity… that would be done by the DOE
> DOE says we look at radiation but only on land
> FDA says yes but this isn’t affecting our food supply
> National Science Foundation says we do basic research, and this is really an applied problem
Everyone has a justification for not looking for radiation.
http://wgbhnews.org/post/scientist-turns-public-test-pacific-oceans-radioactivity?utm_referrer=http%3A//m.wgbhnews.org/%3Futm_referrer%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fm.wgbhnews.org%252F%253Futm_referrer%253D%23mobile/20038
So is the bottom line that NO ONE IS TESTING???