Hitachi-GE nuclear reactor design assessment begins and comment by John H. large UK
…Nuclear expert John Large commented: “The existence of such uncertainties together with the quite obvious incompleteness of the plant design and development, particularly in the generic safety critical areas of Fault Studies and Control & Instrumentation must have, surely, rendered the GDA process itself incomplete and inconclusive.”…
The Office for Nuclear Regulation and the Environment Agency have begun assessing Hitachi-GE’s boiling water nuclear reactor design.
The Ecologist
6th January 2014
http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_round_up/2225593/hitachige_nuclear_reactor_design_assessment_begins.html
In January 2013, UK regulators received a Government request to undertake a Generic Design Assessment (GDA) of a new nuclear reactor design in the UK, Hitachi-GE’s Advanced Boiling Water Reactor – the UK ABWR.
A year on, the regulators “consider that they should now begin their assessments and that there are adequate project management, technical and legal provisions in place.”
Horizon Nuclear Power Ltd are planning to use the UK ABWR at Wylfa in Anglesey and Oldbury in Gloucestershire. If the reactor design passes the GDA it may also be used by any developer at any of the sites included in the Government’s Nuclear National Policy Statement.
These include Bradwell (Essex), Hartlepool (Durham), Heysham (Lancashire), Hinkley Point (Somerset), Oldbury (South Gloucestershire), Sellafield (Cumbria), Sizewell (Suffolk) and Wylfa (Anglesey).
In principle the design could also be used at the two EDF nuclear sites at Hinkley Point in Somerset and Sizewell in Suffolk. However EDF has announced its intention to build the troubled EDF / AREVA European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) reactor design – despite the prodigious problems being experienced with the EPR at Olkiluoto in Finland and Flamanville in France.
The purpose of the GDA system is to allow regulators to begin assessing the safety, security, environmental and waste implications of a new reactor design before site-specific proposals are brought forward. The GDA for the ABWR is expected to take four years to complete.
However critics say that the GDA system has already failed after it passed the EPR reactor design in spite of 724 unresolved concerns known as ‘Assessment Findings’. This is set out on The Ecologist in “Hinkley C: the Generic Design Assessment has failed“.
Nuclear expert John Large commented: “The existence of such uncertainties together with the quite obvious incompleteness of the plant design and development, particularly in the generic safety critical areas of Fault Studies and Control & Instrumentation must have, surely, rendered the GDA process itself incomplete and inconclusive.”
2 Comments »
Leave a reply to arclight2011part2 Cancel reply
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



It would be great to see more balance in your presentation of nuclear news. The anti nuclear bias is overwhelming.
its a tough call Chris as i am doing this primarily for the children and families in Fukushima.. i am interested in nuclear issues as you know and can sometimes pick up interesting “pro nuclear ” articles as well as info on health effects , human rights stuff etc.. Saying that this blog is used by “pro nuke” viewers and subscribers .. and i am cool with that.. in the end we need the nuclear workers to clean up the messes left around the globe and i want more independent health studies.. i have proven (as well a s others some discrepensies in the truth , to put it mildly perhaps? we are all looking for the truth and the pro nuke medssage has huge resources CNN to BBC etc .. I think there is more balance here than on these outlets.. imo though the bbc does surprise me on occasion..
thanks for highlighting the bias on the blog but you are welcome here and i know that the rare articles we put up here might be interesting for you.. i do get a bit of a kicking for my pro nuke articles but they are interesting and relevant.. i did qoute Arevas big man and didnt put a scary photo as i have in the past π i hope you enjoy the humour that can sometimes be found.. i like satirical articles when they can be found.. π
peace
man on the fence (sorta)
sean