Where did Fukushimas Plutonium go to? Where did it come from?
“…Appprox 10 Curies of PU 241 was released PER TON of MOX fuel ejected.. no figures have been done to ascertain the actual quantity of Pu241 that was ejected. In fact the Japanese can only refer to plutonium as “Alpha” (hinting at the type of energy released by plutonium 241)….”
Date posted 17 September 2013
Posted by Arclight
h/t Satsuki “the indomitable ” and Paul Langley ” a very nice person”
Looking through some of the limited public data on radionuclide contamination, i noticed a few points that might be worth noting. Although the levels are shown as low in these USA air readings , the proportions of Iodine 131 and Beta was surprising. Also, the Alpha measurement was only slightly less.. there was a larger selection of radionuclide’s to include as well.
And this is to show the date of the air samples
The Beta (radon and uranium?) content was as high as the iodine 131, or at least the beta reading as shown on the screenshots.. you can access the hard to use, unergonomic csv files here…
http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/FieldSampleAirResults_2.csv
From this link
http://energy.gov/downloads/us-doennsa-response-2011-fukushima-incident-data-and-documentation
could this be where the beta or radon came from?
Did they come from the very active MOX spent Fuel pool 4 contents?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=y8LuCaWLUYg#t=64
or
MOX reactor 3 contents ejection event?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7naSc81WSqA
here is Prof. Chris Busby measuring an air filter and finding high levels of Pb lead from a Tokyo apartment building contaminated during the same early months
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3YMa391qrE
The levels found on the above screenshots show low values and much of the actual data is under encrypted password, though they show these values.. if we were to look at the comparative values of these low doses and say that Tokyo was hit with Pblead (betas) and Iodine131 and slightly lesser Plutonium and uranium quantities The Radon component that would leave a Pblead residue that would build up over time as shown by Prof Busbies video. So, does this mean that the new MOX fuel has had unintended contaminations?
The chart also shows a lesser amount of alpha. Is this a uranium component that is responsible for it?
Mox fuel has a lot of waste uranium in it and a lesser amount of Plutonium. However, the total amount of plutonium that could be released from unit 3 Daichi during its mile high dark smoke explosion (shown on the nearly censored video of it) is about 10 curies per ton of MOX fuel ejected from Daichi 3 and likely more if it was from the superhot new fuel rods that nestled with the older MOX fuel rods.. It sounds like they were trying different mixes too.. sort of experimental, like Chernobyl. UK made and USA supported for those needed exclusive isotopes. All corporately backed.
Some interesting links for you to look at that i feel are relevant;
Berkeley Nucleonics: Plutonium-239 levels were almost as high as Cesium-137 a dozen kilometers from Fukushima Daiichi (PHOTO & VIDEO) http://enenews.com/berkeley-nucleonics-plutonium-239-levels-almost-high-cesium-137-dozen-kilometers-fukushima-daiichi-photo-video
November 24th, 2012
Title: Berkeley Nucleonics Japan Update Page
Source: Berkeley Nucleonics
Live Map in Fukushima (SAM 940 Readings) – Ground
UN Report – Bloggers response! – Japanese delegation to The UN spreads Lies and Deception!
The Japanese delegation prevaricated and outright lied concerning the present situation on the ground in the most contaminated areas downwind of the stricken nuclear plant Daichi 1 where 3 meltdowns occurred and a MOX Plutonium reactor exploded with devastating results, creating a mile high mushroom cloud!
Appprox 10 Curies of PU 241 was released PER TON of MOX fuel ejected.. no figures have been done to ascertain the actual quantity of Pu241 that was ejected. In fact the Japanese can only refer to plutonium as “Alpha” (hinting at the type of energy released by plutonium 241).
…..Tepco was not just seeking approval to install 32 MOX fuel assemblies into the core of Reactor 3 at Fukushima – I. It appears that they were intentional about taking it a step further and in fact seeking approval for a quick transition to a 1/3 MOX core at the NPP in question……(July 31, 2010 http://www.simplyinfo.org/?p=1734 )…
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (277)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS





Leave a comment