Japanese Governments pro nuclear agenda explained!
“…for the transport of plutonium which the United States requires of Japan..”
Published on May 30, 2013
The real reason is about attempting to expand Japanese Capital market while denying many material conditions surrounding Japan`s nuclear technology.
Image source ; http://edufire.com/forums/9-classes/topics/4530-nuclear-fuel-cycle-u-238
Australia-Euratom Nuclear Safeguards: Plutonium Retransfers
Published by nuclear-news.net
by Arclight2011
31 May 2013
The Agreement stipulates that retransfers of Australian obligated plutonium can only take place if it is transported with plutonium which is subject to the United States-Japan Agreement on nuclear cooperation
[…]
bringing into force an Agreement under which Australia will – subject to certain conditions – broaden its consent for the return from the European Union to Japan of Australian following the reprocessing of Japanese spent fuel in Europe. The European Union is an important provider of nuclear fuel cycle services for countries purchasing Australian uranium and Japan is a major market for Australian uranium exports.
[…]
In September 1993, Australia gave Euratom its consent for the retransfer from the European Union to Japan of plutonium bearing both Australian and United States safeguards ; the latter obligation acquired as a result of Australian nuclear material undergoing processing at some stage of the fuel cycle in the United States Under the new treaty-level Agreement Australia will give consent for the retransfer from the European Union to Japan of the small proportion of Australian obligated plutonium
[…]
The refinement of prior consent rights under the Australia-Euratom Agreement is seen as desirable by both Euratom and Japan, and is consistent with the practice of their other major uranium suppliers; Canada and the United States.
for the transport of plutonium which the United States requires of Japan. The Agreement also provides for direct assurances from Euratom to Australia concerning the security arrangements being applied to transfers involving Australian obligated plutonium
https://nuclear-news.net/2013/05/30/australia-euratom-nuclear-safeguards-plutonium-retransfers/
H/t Jan Caron for these links
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-30/japan-pre-open-equities-green-bonds-red-abenomics-blue
1 Comment »
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- June 2023 (20)
- May 2023 (344)
- April 2023 (348)
- March 2023 (308)
- February 2023 (379)
- January 2023 (388)
- December 2022 (277)
- November 2022 (335)
- October 2022 (363)
- September 2022 (259)
- August 2022 (367)
- July 2022 (368)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
[…] Japanese Governments pro nuclear agenda explained! (nuclear-news.net) […]
Pingback by Japanese government won’t stop shark finning | Dear Kitty. Some blog | May 31, 2013 |