An Aluminium Fuel Cell – Why Is UK government Blocking It?
Update: at the end of the video where the video audio becomes mysteriously corrupted as the converstaion turned to the advice from the business advisor’s that he went to see.
The statement that he got from these financiers was that the UK government will only support “electrically rechargeable” batteries. Meaning, “only that can be charged with nuclear power” imo
h/t ; http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/aluminium-fuel-cell-why-government-blocking-it
13 Comments »
Leave a Reply
1.This Month
Radiation Containment A New Concern In Russian Nuclear Incident | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC
Fukushima 2020 Olympics Nightmare: Is PM Abe Criminally Insane?
Accelerating Sea-Level Rise with Increase in Extreme Weather Frequency, Severity, and Duration
Arctic-Sea Ice Collapse: Greenland Vulnerability; Global Sea-Level Rise; Extreme Weather Mayhem
How the viewing public was ‘protected’ from seeing what the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear bombing did to people
Hiroshima and Nagasaki on the cutting room floor https://thebulletin.org/2019/08/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-on-the-cutting-room-floor/ By Thomas Gaulkin, August 5, 2019 Seventy-four years after nuclear weapons were first and last used in war, it can be challenging to conceive of the devastation they cause. But even in the immediate months after the atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, news accounts offered a view of ingenuity and destruction that often elided the human cost.
The newsreels below [on original] were mainly screened to audiences in 1946 and 1947 and detail the destructive force of the explosions almost entirely through excited accounts of the structural damage to the cities. There’s occasional mention of the lost city populations and the scientific knowledge to be gained from studying their casualties, but hardly any description of what people actually suffered, let alone personal accounts. It’s instructive to look at and listen to these reports today, and contemplate what is missing.
The 12-minute reel below was produced by the US War Department in 1946. “Tale of Two Cities” makes selective use of film that was confiscated from a Japanese filmmaker, Akira Iwasaki—though you wouldn’t know that from the narration, which boasts that “army cameramen have found and filmed pictorial evidence that tells in twisted steel and stone the effect of death-dealing atomic power.” (Some twenty years later, historian Eric Barnouw obtained more of Iwasaki’s footage and produced a remarkably different narrative that documented the horrible physical impact of the attacks on Hiroshima’s citizens.)
Contrasted with the triumphant tone of the news/propaganda made for 1940s audiences, silence changes everything. Made public only decades later, the two films below —one beginning with footage of wounded victims, the other, a full-color glimpse of survivors picking up the pieces of the ruined city—report what those above do not, without a single word.
PETITION
Free Julian Assange, before it’s too late. Sign to STOP the USA Extradition
-
Archives
- August 2019 (176)
- July 2019 (390)
- June 2019 (354)
- May 2019 (326)
- April 2019 (366)
- March 2019 (366)
- February 2019 (317)
- January 2019 (341)
- December 2018 (310)
- November 2018 (306)
- October 2018 (329)
- September 2018 (383)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
The reactions of the governments involved is bizarre.
This engineer should start making & selling fuel cells for custom electric car conversions. When the performance starts to be publicized, consumer demand would be high enough to get this tech into widespread production.
On thought: It would be very beneficial to identify the people behind-the-scenes trying to stop this tech.
why should i act so suprised
if it cannot kill or mame or make themselves rich, governments are not interested!!!
to me MP’s are jst as bad as drug dealers, mind at least you can get high and enjoyment from drugs!!
Tax, tax tax, eventually this device would ruin the worlds economy which is oil based. Imagine if you could fly without wings and take off from your backyard, this device takes that a step closer
Given the published specs for powering an EV, this fuel cell would indeed change the oil paradigm and usher in the age of the EV. That alone should make bringing this to market this most important thing we could do for the planet. We could cut car-based pollution to NOTHING.
[…] [includes video] An Aluminium Fuel Cell – Why Is UK government Blocking It? https://nuclear-news.net/2013/05/03/an-aluminium-fuel-cell-why-is-uk-government-blocking-it/ […]
Pingback by UK govt blocking new aluminium fuel cell? « Antinuclear | May 6, 2013 |
The PTB will block any energy device that is efficient enough to challenge the fossil fuel based systems. The petrodollar must survive for a while longer. Freedom from the big utility companies is achievable, just think back to how people lived before the industrial revolution.
use kickstarter..
[…] https://nuclear-news.net/2013/05/03/an-aluminium-fuel-cell-why-is-uk-government-blocking-it/ […]
Pingback by Jeremy Rifkin worries about the end of human civilization – May 23 2013. « nuclear-news | May 25, 2013 |
[…] https://nuclear-news.net/2013/05/03/an-aluminium-fuel-cell-why-is-uk-government-blocking-it/ […]
Pingback by AREVA – French police investigate anti nuclear sabotage at site of nuclear train crash « nuclear-news | July 20, 2013 |
[…] https://nuclear-news.net/2013/05/03/an-aluminium-fuel-cell-why-is-uk-government-blocking-it/ […]
Pingback by A hard-headed look at UK nuclear power – Friends of the earth decide against nuclear – New report decisive! « nuclear-news | August 24, 2013 |
[…] …It also acts as a prospectus for investors, identifying key UK private and public sector infrastructure opportunities….. [Some light reading https://nuclear-news.net/2013/05/03/an-aluminium-fuel-cell-why-is-uk-government-blocking-it/ ????… […]
Pingback by Insurance industry announces they will invest £25 billion in infrastructure as government publishes UK plan. « nuclear-news | December 5, 2013 |
[…] An Aluminium Fuel Cell – Why Is UK government Blocking It? […]
Pingback by UK Column Discussion / UK Column / UK Column News | | July 31, 2014 |
The government won’t support anything that doesn’t have a way of making money, either for them personally or as a tax cow. They go for Solar and Wind because they have a vested interest probably and it also means that because neither of these produce enough energy they can build more and ruin the countryside but it also means that the power has to be provided through conventional means and therefore their investments are safe. it’s always a case of “follow the money”. The wheel will turn, I wish I could have a fuel cell power unit in my house in Spain but I can’t afford it unless someone wants me to be a guinea pig. I thing FC technology is the best way forward and have done since 1996 when I first learned about it. Interestingly Mr Jackson I trained you when I was a PTI in the Royal Navy at Fisgard and again at Royal Arthur. Well done in producing the product I wish I could help you with sponsorship.