nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Time we all woke up to the pro-nuclear con!

Christina Macpherson's websites & blogs

On today’s page I include an article on India and the planned nuclear reactors there.  I was struck by the fact that it will be a “multi-billion dollar market to American firms” .  But, at the same time, those  firms want to make sure that the Indian government (i.e the Indian taxpayer) will pay for any “industrial accident”.  (Quote ‘ India’s multi-billion-dollar nuclear market to American firms. US firms already worry over delays such as writing a new Indian law to limit US firms’ liability in case of an industrial accident’)

The nuclear industry wants the money – but not the responsibility.  They must think that the danger is important, to be concerning themselves so much about such liability.  Yet at the same time, they’ll tell us all that the industry is so very safe.

Do we take note of these contradictions?  Is this a new and so much more sophisticated version of Western colonial oppression?

December 9, 2009 - Posted by | Christina's notes, India, spinbuster | , , , , ,

2 Comments »

  1. Nuclear option is not for future generations!

    Ten thousand (10,000) young scientists, engineering students and concerned citizens, have, in a Memorandum to Prime Minister who is also Atomic Energy Minister, asked the Government of India to re- assess the futuristic social cost of its ambitious Nuclear Power programme. On the anniversary of Bhopal Gas tragedy, the signatories questioned the country’s preparedness to face any nuclear mishaps.
    The memorandum referred to recent accident at Indian Oil Corporation’s Jaipur depot which destroyed millions of litres of petrol, diesel and kerosene. The fire burned abetted for 6 days, killing workers and destroying millions worth industrial property. Had the explosion occurred in an Atomic power plant at Kota, Rajsthan, e.g., no one would tell the scale of devastation. Yet, the Indian government has announced its long-term nuclear commitment to generate 40,000. MWe nuclear power by 2030. It had entered into Nuclear deals with seven countries, including the United States, costing the nation more than US$ 150 billion.
    It takes 10-15 years to build a nuclear power plant but the designed life of a reactor is only 50 years. There after for hundred years the entire structure, plant area, equipment and tones of nuclear waste material pose serious engineering and financial problems for their safe-keeping. According to the World Nuclear Industry Status Report, (August, 2009), the Nuclear Power is on “downward trend world wide” and “the largest nuclear builders in the world AREVA NP has turned into financial fiasco”.
    There are many post-Chernobyl (1986) scientific studies warning us against Nuclear Power. The US National Academy of Sciences’ Committee for Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation and the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation had cautioned against long-term epidemiological radiation effects. The Kyoto Protocol had excluded nuclear power from the Clean Development Mechanism. Dr. Richard Mould’s study Chernobyl: Th Real Story describes how tens of thousands citizens in Europe suffered the radiation effects. Contaminated helicopters, vehicles, buildings, machines, tools, roads, soil, trees, and forests had to be abandoned. “The accident at Chernobyl reaffirmed what an abyss will open if nuclear war befalls mankind. For inherent in the nuclear arsenals stockpiled are thousands upon thousands of potential disasters far more horrible than the Chernobyl one,’ concluded Dr. Mould.
    The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that world wide energy demand in 2030 would be 16.9 TW ( terawatts or TW). And the Water, Wind and Solar (WWS) each can meet human demand globally. Solar energy alone offers 6,500 TW. ( “A Plan for a Sustainable Future, WWS by 2030,” in the Scientific American: India, November 2009, pp. 38-45, http://www.sciam.co.in)
    Mr. Hans-Holger Rogner, Head, Planning and Economic Studies Section of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), says that ‘the arguments against the nuclear power deserve an objective assessment.’ And the German Nuclear Safety Act 2002, plans “To phase out the use of Nuclear Power.” Since it had been dormant for 30 years, Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dr. Dale Klein says that no scope for revival of Nuclear sector in the US. And the Editor-in-Chief and Head of the IAEA Information, Mr. Lothar Wedekin admits that “the future of Nuclear Power is uncertain but One thing looks clear – the next generation of (nuclear) plants will not be Made in the USA.”. (The IAEA Bulletin, vol.49/1, 2008).
    The memorandum calls for a national debate on nuclear energy as no Parliamentary Committee had discussed the reliability and performance of “Peaceful Nuclear” programme. The government had avoided inter-departmental discussions with Science and Public Policy ministries –Energy, Finance, Planning Commission, Science and Technology, and Environment. Since the safer and economical Renewable Sources of Energy: Water, Wind and Solar are available to us, there is absolutely no necessity to commit the future generations to potentially hazardous nuclear industrial option.

    This memorandum is open for supportive signature campaign till January 1, 2010.
    Please circulate it among your friends and confirm to include you among the signatories.

    Campaign sponsored by: The Indian Youth-Science Forum.
    Coordinator: Dr. Dhirendra Sharma, Centre for Science Policy. psand@vsnl.net
    “Nirmal Nilay”, Bhagwantpur, Dehradun 248 009. (0135) 2735 627.
    Mob. 989788 3741.

    Comment by Dhirendra Sharma | December 13, 2009 | Reply

  2. Nuclear option is not for future generations!

    Ten thousand (10,000) young scientists, engineering students and concerned citizens, have, in a Memorandum to Prime Minister who is also Atomic Energy Minister, asked the Government of India to re- assess the futuristic social cost of its ambitious Nuclear Power programme. On the anniversary of Bhopal Gas tragedy, the signatories questioned the country’s preparedness to face any nuclear mishaps.
    The memorandum referred to recent accident at Indian Oil Corporation’s Jaipur depot which destroyed millions of litres of petrol, diesel and kerosene. The fire burned abetted for 6 days, killing workers and destroying millions worth industrial property. Had the explosion occurred in an Atomic power plant at Kota, Rajsthan, e.g., no one would tell the scale of devastation. Yet, the Indian government has announced its long-term nuclear commitment to generate 40,000. MWe nuclear power by 2030. It had entered into Nuclear deals with seven countries, including the United States, costing the nation more than US$ 150 billion.
    It takes 10-15 years to build a nuclear power plant but the designed life of a reactor is only 50 years. There after for hundred years the entire structure, plant area, equipment and tones of nuclear waste material pose serious engineering and financial problems for their safe-keeping. According to the World Nuclear Industry Status Report, (August, 2009), the Nuclear Power is on “downward trend world wide” and “the largest nuclear builders in the world AREVA NP has turned into financial fiasco”.
    There are many post-Chernobyl (1986) scientific studies warning us against Nuclear Power. The US National Academy of Sciences’ Committee for Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation and the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation had cautioned against long-term epidemiological radiation effects. The Kyoto Protocol had excluded nuclear power from the Clean Development Mechanism. Dr. Richard Mould’s study Chernobyl: Th Real Story describes how tens of thousands citizens in Europe suffered the radiation effects. Contaminated helicopters, vehicles, buildings, machines, tools, roads, soil, trees, and forests had to be abandoned. “The accident at Chernobyl reaffirmed what an abyss will open if nuclear war befalls mankind. For inherent in the nuclear arsenals stockpiled are thousands upon thousands of potential disasters far more horrible than the Chernobyl one,’ concluded Dr. Mould.
    The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that world wide energy demand in 2030 would be 16.9 TW ( terawatts or TW). And the Water, Wind and Solar (WWS) each can meet human demand globally. Solar energy alone offers 6,500 TW. ( “A Plan for a Sustainable Future, WWS by 2030,” in the Scientific American: India, November 2009, pp. 38-45, http://www.sciam.co.in)
    Mr. Hans-Holger Rogner, Head, Planning and Economic Studies Section of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), says that ‘the arguments against the nuclear power deserve an objective assessment.’ And the German Nuclear Safety Act 2002, plans “To phase out the use of Nuclear Power.” Since it had been dormant for 30 years, Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dr. Dale Klein says that no scope for revival of Nuclear sector in the US. And the Editor-in-Chief and Head of the IAEA Information, Mr. Lothar Wedekin admits that “the future of Nuclear Power is uncertain but One thing looks clear – the next generation of (nuclear) plants will not be Made in the USA.”. (The IAEA Bulletin, vol.49/1, 2008).
    The memorandum calls for a national debate on nuclear energy as no Parliamentary Committee had discussed the reliability and performance of “Peaceful Nuclear” programme. The government had avoided inter-departmental discussions with Science and Public Policy ministries –Energy, Finance, Planning Commission, Science and Technology, and Environment. Since the safer and economical Renewable Sources of Energy: Water, Wind and Solar are available to us, there is absolutely no necessity to commit the future generations to potentially hazardous nuclear industrial option.

    This memorandum is open for supportive signature campaign till January 1, 2010.
    Please circulate it among your friends and confirm to include you among the signatories.

    Campaign sponsored by: The Indian Youth-Science Forum.
    Coordinator: Dr. Dhirendra Sharma, Centre for Science Policy. psand@vsnl.net
    “Nirmal Nilay”, Bhagwantpur, Dehradun 248 009. (0135) 2735 627.
    Mob. 989788 3741.

    Nuclear option is not for future generations!

    Ten thousand (10,000) young scientists, engineering students and concerned citizens, have, in a Memorandum to Prime Minister who is also Atomic Energy Minister, asked the Government of India to re- assess the futuristic social cost of its ambitious Nuclear Power programme. On the anniversary of Bhopal Gas tragedy, the signatories questioned the country’s preparedness to face any nuclear mishaps.
    The memorandum referred to recent accident at Indian Oil Corporation’s Jaipur depot which destroyed millions of litres of petrol, diesel and kerosene. The fire burned abetted for 6 days, killing workers and destroying millions worth industrial property. Had the explosion occurred in an Atomic power plant at Kota, Rajsthan, e.g., no one would tell the scale of devastation. Yet, the Indian government has announced its long-term nuclear commitment to generate 40,000. MWe nuclear power by 2030. It had entered into Nuclear deals with seven countries, including the United States, costing the nation more than US$ 150 billion.
    It takes 10-15 years to build a nuclear power plant but the designed life of a reactor is only 50 years. There after for hundred years the entire structure, plant area, equipment and tones of nuclear waste material pose serious engineering and financial problems for their safe-keeping. According to the World Nuclear Industry Status Report, (August, 2009), the Nuclear Power is on “downward trend world wide” and “the largest nuclear builders in the world AREVA NP has turned into financial fiasco”.
    There are many post-Chernobyl (1986) scientific studies warning us against Nuclear Power. The US National Academy of Sciences’ Committee for Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation and the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation had cautioned against long-term epidemiological radiation effects. The Kyoto Protocol had excluded nuclear power from the Clean Development Mechanism. Dr. Richard Mould’s study Chernobyl: Th Real Story describes how tens of thousands citizens in Europe suffered the radiation effects. Contaminated helicopters, vehicles, buildings, machines, tools, roads, soil, trees, and forests had to be abandoned. “The accident at Chernobyl reaffirmed what an abyss will open if nuclear war befalls mankind. For inherent in the nuclear arsenals stockpiled are thousands upon thousands of potential disasters far more horrible than the Chernobyl one,’ concluded Dr. Mould.
    The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that world wide energy demand in 2030 would be 16.9 TW ( terawatts or TW). And the Water, Wind and Solar (WWS) each can meet human demand globally. Solar energy alone offers 6,500 TW. ( “A Plan for a Sustainable Future, WWS by 2030,” in the Scientific American: India, November 2009, pp. 38-45, http://www.sciam.co.in)
    Mr. Hans-Holger Rogner, Head, Planning and Economic Studies Section of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), says that ‘the arguments against the nuclear power deserve an objective assessment.’ And the German Nuclear Safety Act 2002, plans “To phase out the use of Nuclear Power.” Since it had been dormant for 30 years, Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dr. Dale Klein says that no scope for revival of Nuclear sector in the US. And the Editor-in-Chief and Head of the IAEA Information, Mr. Lothar Wedekin admits that “the future of Nuclear Power is uncertain but One thing looks clear – the next generation of (nuclear) plants will not be Made in the USA.”. (The IAEA Bulletin, vol.49/1, 2008).
    The memorandum calls for a national debate on nuclear energy as no Parliamentary Committee had discussed the reliability and performance of “Peaceful Nuclear” programme. The government had avoided inter-departmental discussions with Science and Public Policy ministries –Energy, Finance, Planning Commission, Science and Technology, and Environment. Since the safer and economical Renewable Sources of Energy: Water, Wind and Solar are available to us, there is absolutely no necessity to commit the future generations to potentially hazardous nuclear industrial option.

    This memorandum is open for supportive signature campaign till January 1, 2010.
    Please circulate it among your friends and confirm to include you among the signatories.

    Campaign sponsored by: The Indian Youth-Science Forum.
    Coordinator: Dr. Dhirendra Sharma, Centre for Science Policy. psand@vsnl.net
    “Nirmal Nilay”, Bhagwantpur, Dehradun 248 009. (0135) 2735 627.
    Mob. 989788 3741.

    Comment by Dhirendra Sharma | December 13, 2009 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: