nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Nuclear fast breeder reactors – wishful thinking!

The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction – Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion? The Oil Drum by Francois Cellier on November 10, 2009 – “….

The publicly available data from past experimental breeder reactors indicate that a large number of unsolved technological problems exist and that the amount of “created” fissile material, either from the U238 → Pu239 or from the Th232 → U233 cycle, is still far below the breeder requirements and optimistic theoretical expectations.

Thus huge efforts, including many basic research questions with an uncertain outcome, are needed before a large commercial breeder prototype can be designed.

Even if such efforts are undertaken by the technologically most advanced countries, it will take several decades before such a prototype can be constructed. We conclude therefore, that ideas about near-future commercial fission breeder reactors are nothing but wishful thinking.

We further postulate that, no matter how far into the future we may look, nuclear fusion as an energy source is even less probable than large-scale breeder reactors, for the accumulated knowledge on this subject is already sufficient to say that commercial fusion power will never become a reality……”

The Oil Drum: Europe | The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction – Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?

November 11, 2009 - Posted by | 1, 2 WORLD | , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment »

  1. It is a shame that still billions of dollars are spent by governments for R&D into Fast Breeder Reactors,FBR, and nuclear fusion, like the ITER. The first nucear reactor ever to produce electricity was a FBR, in the USA.Alle FBR´s ever built are now closed down, because of technical problems, accidents and very high costs. FBR´s are a dream that will never come true. They would produce many thousands kilograms of plutonium a year, which poses a serious terrorist risk and a big waste problem.
    This money would be better spent on renewable energy and energy efficiency.

    joop boer's avatar Comment by joop boer | February 8, 2010 | Reply


Leave a reply to joop boer Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.