nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry

Japanese Governments pro nuclear agenda explained!

“…for the transport of plutonium which the United States requires of Japan..”

freedomwv

Published on May 30, 2013

The real reason is about attempting to expand Japanese Capital market while denying many material conditions surrounding Japan`s nuclear technology.

Nuclear Fuel Cycle}

Image source ; http://edufire.com/forums/9-classes/topics/4530-nuclear-fuel-cycle-u-238

Australia-Euratom Nuclear Safeguards: Plutonium Retransfers

Published by nuclear-news.net

by Arclight2011

31 May 2013

The Agreement stipulates that retransfers of Australian  obligated plutonium can only take place if it is transported with plutonium which is subject to the United States-Japan Agreement on nuclear cooperation

[...]

bringing into force an Agreement under which Australia will – subject to certain conditions – broaden its consent for the return from the European Union to Japan of Australian   following the reprocessing of Japanese spent fuel in Europe. The European Union is an important provider of nuclear fuel cycle services for countries purchasing Australian uranium and Japan is a major market for Australian uranium exports.

[...]

In September 1993, Australia gave Euratom its consent for the retransfer from the European Union to Japan of plutonium bearing both Australian and United States safeguards     ; the latter obligation acquired as a result of Australian nuclear material undergoing processing at some stage of the fuel cycle in the United States Under the new treaty-level Agreement Australia will give consent for the retransfer from the European Union to Japan of the small proportion of Australian obligated plutonium

[...]

The refinement of prior consent rights under the Australia-Euratom Agreement is seen as desirable by both Euratom and Japan, and is consistent with the practice of their other major uranium suppliers; Canada and the United States.

for the transport of plutonium which the United States requires of Japan. The Agreement also provides for direct assurances from Euratom to Australia concerning the security arrangements being applied to transfers involving Australian obligated plutonium

http://nuclear-news.net/2013/05/30/australia-euratom-nuclear-safeguards-plutonium-retransfers/

H/t Jan Caron for these links

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/11/03/news/u-s-needs-japan-to-remain-nuclear-expert-says/#.UahFyRilYjV

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-30/japan-pre-open-equities-green-bonds-red-abenomics-blue

About these ads

May 31, 2013 - Posted by | Uncategorized

1 Comment »

  1. […] Japanese Governments pro nuclear agenda explained! (nuclear-news.net) […]

    Pingback by Japanese government won’t stop shark finning | Dear Kitty. Some blog | May 31, 2013 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 700 other followers

%d bloggers like this: