nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Pakistani Nuclear Security Worries U.S. Officials

Pakistani Nuclear Security Worries U.S. Officials
Global Security Newswire Jan. 12, 2009 Preventing Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal from falling into extremist hands is a more important security priority for the United States than stabilizing Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a Bush administration report delivered to the team preparing for Barack Obama’s presidency, the New York Times reported yesterday

“Only one of those countries has a hundred nuclear weapons,” the report’s lead author said. Concerns persist over Islamabad’s ability to protect the arsenal, according to the Times.

U.S. intelligence officials have briefed Obama on the possibility that some Pakistani scientists with radical Islamic sympathies have sought to join the ranks of the nation’s nuclear elite……………………….The official also expressed concern that militants could try to steal nuclear weapons that were being transferred between facilities. Some U.S. officials were concerned that the recent terrorist attacks in the Indian city of Mumbai might have been intended to spur Pakistan to move tactical nuclear weapons to border positions so they could be stolen, the Times reported.

NTI: Global Security Newswire – Pakistani Nuclear Security Worries U.S. Officials

January 13, 2009 Posted by | safety | , , , | Leave a comment

Critics oppose Georgia Power’s nuclear plan

Critics oppose Georgia Power’s nuclear plan
pbaonline Charles Edwards

WABE: Critics oppose Georgia Power’s nuclear plan (2009-01-12)

January 13, 2009 Posted by | politics | , , , | Leave a comment

U.S. targets A.Q. Khan nuclear network

U.S. targets A.Q. Khan nuclear network WASHINGTON (CNN) — Sanctions will be placed on 13 people and three companies “for their involvement in the A.Q. Khan nuclear proliferation network,” the U.S. State Department said Monday.

Khan, a Pakistani scientist, operated an international black market in nuclear material to a number of states with a history of poor relations with the United States.

He was arrested in February 2004 and eventually pardoned by former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf.

The sanctions, which follow a U.S. review of the network, “will help prevent future proliferation-related activities by these private entities, provide a warning to other would-be proliferators, and demonstrate our ongoing commitment to using all available tools to address proliferation-related activities.”

The department notes that Khan spearheaded an “extensive international network for the proliferation of nuclear equipment and know-how that provided one-stop shopping for countries seeking to develop nuclear weapons.”

Iran and Libya received centrifuge components, centrifuges, and designs from Khan and his associates, and the United States believes the network “provided centrifuge designs, equipment, and technology to North Korea.”………………”While we believe the A.Q. Khan network is no longer operating, countries should remain vigilant to ensure that Khan network associates, or others seeking to pursue similar proliferation activities, will not become a future source for sensitive nuclear information or equipment.”

U.S. targets A.Q. Khan nuclear network – CNN.com

January 13, 2009 Posted by | safety | , , , | Leave a comment

US blacklists father and son over alleged nuclear racket

US blacklists father and son over alleged nuclear racket
The Guardian, Ian Traynor, 13 January 2009

Two British businessmen, a father and son, were yesterday blacklisted by the US government for their alleged involvement in the world’s worst illicit nuclear proliferation racket.

Peter Griffin, a 73-year-old believed to be living in the south of France, and his son, Paul, 44, were among 13 individuals and three companies named by the US state department and treasury for involvement in the nuclear smuggling network headed by the disgraced Pakistani metallurgist, Abdul Qadeer Khan.

The Khan network supplied much of the technology and knowhow for Iran’s clandestine nuclear projects which were discovered in 2003, triggering a major, inconclusive, international crisis that looks like being one of the toughest problems confronting the incoming Obama administration………………The Griffins were joined on the blacklist by several other engineers and businessmen from Germany, Switzerland, and South Africa, as well as Sri Lanka, Turkey and the Middle East, where Khan’s network was based in Dubai. Several of those named have been jailed.

US blacklists father and son over alleged nuclear racket | World news | The Guardian

January 13, 2009 Posted by | secrets,lies and civil liberties | , , , | Leave a comment

U.S. Rejected Aid for Israeli Raid on Iranian Nuclear Site – NYTimes.com

U.S. Rejected Aid for Israeli Raid on Iranian Nuclear Site

The New York Times January 10, 2009

WASHINGTON — President Bush deflected a secret request by Israel last year for specialized bunker-busting bombs it wanted for an attack on Iran’s main nuclear complex and told the Israelis that he had authorized new covert action intended to sabotage Iran’s suspected effort to develop nuclear weapons, according to senior American and foreign officials.

White House officials never conclusively determined whether Israel had decided to go ahead with the strike before the United States protested, or whether Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel was trying to goad the White House into more decisive action before Mr. Bush left office. But the Bush administration was particularly alarmed by an Israeli request to fly over Iraq to reach Iran’s major nuclear complex at Natanz, where the country’s only known uranium enrichment plant is located.

The White House denied that request outright, American officials said, and the Israelis backed off their plans, at least temporarily. But the tense exchanges also prompted the White House to step up intelligence-sharing with Israel and brief Israeli officials on new American efforts to subtly sabotage Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, a major covert program that Mr. Bush is about to hand off to President-elect Barack Obama.

U.S. Rejected Aid for Israeli Raid on Iranian Nuclear Site – NYTimes.com

January 13, 2009 Posted by | weapons and war | , , , | Leave a comment

Austria furious at re-opening of nuclear plant

Austria furious at re-opening of nuclear plant
Radio Netherlands 12 Jan 09 “We were really aghast when we heard that it’s being taken back into use,” was the angry comment from Herwig Schuster – spokesperson for the Austrian branch of Greenpeace – at the news that the Bohunice V 2 nuclear power station, located just 100 km from Vienna in neighbouring Slovakia, is to re-open. After numerous protests, from Austria in particular, the power station was officially closed at the end of last year. But now, because of the problems with the supply of gas from Russia, the Slovak government has indicated that it wants to bring the reactor back into use.

Greenpeace’s Herwig Schuster argues that the re-opening would involve an enormous risk:

“Bohunice V 2 is an old Soviet-made power station. The casing is porous, and the level of protection so weak that anything that lands on it – an aircraft for example – would damage it”.

Austria furious at re-opening of nuclear plant – Radio Netherlands Worldwide – English

January 13, 2009 Posted by | safety | , , , | Leave a comment

H-bomb ‘guinea pigs’ claim compensation

H-BOMB ‘GUINEA PIGS’ CLAIM COMPENSATION

DAILY EXPRESS January 12,2009

By John Ingham NUCLEAR test veterans will this month launch their case for compensation, claiming they were used as guinea pigs. About 22,000 British servicemen from attended H-bomb tests in Australia and the South Pacific between 1952 and 1958.

Every other country that had servicemen at the tests has provided them with help.

Campaigners say many British veterans died young, had diseases like cancer or saw their wives suffer miscarriages or give birth to deformed children. Next week lawyers representing 1,000 survivors and their widows will launch an action for compensation which could cost the Ministry of Defence millions.

Veterans accuse the MoD of stalling, knowing the longer the process goes on the fewer will be left alive.

Daily Express | UK News :: H-bomb ‘guinea pigs’ claim compensation

January 13, 2009 Posted by | environment | , , , | Leave a comment

NT denies uranium mine to blame for cancer | National News | News.com.au

NT denies uranium mine to blame for cancer

AAP

THE Northern Territory Government has rejected any link between Australia’s largest uranium mine and higher levels of cancer among Aboriginal people living nearby.

The disturbing findings are part of a preliminary discussion paper into the health affects of Energy Resources of Australia’s (ERA) Ranger mine, which is surrounded by the world heritage-listed Kakadu National Park.

The NT Government says the cancers found in nearby Aboriginal communities are of the type caused by lifestyle and not radiation.

However the Commonwealth’s peak indigenous research body, which commissioned the report, says its discovery of a near doubling in the overall cancer incidence rate, compared to other areas of the territory, is a cause for “serious concern”.

It wants an investigation into a possible link with the mine.

“There is an excess of cancer in the Aboriginal communities of the Kakadu region,” says the leaked report from the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders Studies (AIATSIS)………………………The report is the first to examine health issues since ERA first started mining at Ranger in the 1980s, despite more than 120 recorded “mishaps” including leakages, spillages and breaches of regulations……………………..traditional owners in the region welcomed the report’s findings.

“Scant attention has been paid to the health effects of this development … these health effects include the social and cultural impacts of mining,” said the Gundjeihmi Aboriginal Corporation, representing the Mirarr People.

One of the report’s four authors, Alan Cass from Sydney University, said he stood by the report’s cancer findings.

“This was exploratory research and the report indicates the limitations of the data collected,” he said.

NT denies uranium mine to blame for cancer | National News | News.com.au

January 13, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , | Leave a comment

Brantford Expositor – Ontario, CA

The ethics of energy
THE EXPOSITOR By KELLYGASCOIGNE (Canada) 2 Dec 08 “…………………The ethics behind a government’s energy policy can mean a huge change in the impact we are having on the environment and the economy………………………….Nuclear energy produces a large amount of electricity but, at every stage of production, has huge risks. The mining of radioactive materials to power nuclear plants causes waste products to pollute nearby communities. If problems strike — terrorism, natural disaster, a plant malfunction — nuclear power is very dangerous. Look at the effects of Chernobyl.

Even if a nuclear plant functions perfectly during its 30 to 40 year life-span, the radioactive materials being processed must be disposed of as radioactive waste. Eventually, the plant itself becomes radioactive waste. So although nuclear power provides a huge amount of energy while a plant is running, it is prohibitively expensive to build and then dispose of and is environmentally dangerous. Economically nuclear power is very costly……………we are still paying for the debt created by Ontario’s nuclear power plants built years ago. Check out your electricity bill. The “debt retirement charge” on your bill, refers to our repayment of the $35-million overrun……………………… the current plan for the Ontario government is to commit $40 billion to new and expanded nuclear plants.

What would our province’s energy mix look like if instead that $40 billion was spent on alternative, “green” energy production and on conservation? This ethical decision seems clear. For our health now and for many future generations to come alternative energy sources need to be taken seriously.

When the Ontario government is considering buy-outs to help Ontario’s manufacturing sector, maybe ethics should be a part of their decision making and the jobs created should be green jobs. Short-sighted planning is not ethical leadership.

.

Brantford Expositor – Ontario, CA

December 1, 2008 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , | Leave a comment

Panel debates bombing Iran nuclear sites

Panel debates bombing Iran nuclear sites
FinalCall.com News By Ali GharibUpdated Dec 1, 2008, – WASHINGTON (IPS/GIN) – At this year’s National Council on U.S.-Arab Relations meeting, much of the focus was on the Arab Middle East’s ethnic Persian neighbor to the east: Iran.

A question-and-answer session of a panel on Iraq and Iran in late October was a microcosm of the chatter around Washington all year long about the ebbing and flowing likelihood of a potential U.S. bombing run against alleged secret Iranian nuclear sites.

No one on the panel—a collection of a statesman, military brass, and experts—thought an attack on Iran was imminent, or even would likely happen in a longer view, but that did not stop the debate about the merits and drawbacks of a U.S. strike.

Panel debates bombing Iran nuclear sites

December 1, 2008 Posted by | weapons and war | , , , | Leave a comment