nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

What About the Atomic Vets?

What About the Atomic Vets?

TimesUnion.com August 30, 2009  by Don Rittner

“………….When Saratoga’s John Delay was drafted into the army in 1956, at age 19, he thought his time would be spent like most post war GI’s – perform his assigned duties and go back home. What he didn’t know was that he would become a human guinea pig in a series of radiation experiments conducted by the U.S. Government. Many people have compared these experiments to the human atrocities of Germany and Japan during the second war.

It is estimated that at least 250,000 American soldiers were used as human guinea pigs during some 235 atomic tests conducted between 1946 and 1962 in the Marshall Islands* and State of Nevada to assess, among other things, psychological reaction and how soldiers and civilians would react in case of an all out atomic war. Hundreds of unsuspecting civilians became targets of various studies including the ingestion of very toxic plutonium and other materials. In Nevada and the Marshal Islands, soldiers were placed behind sand bags or in trenches not far from a nuclear blast, were forced to walk into ground zero, and even forced to fly their planes into atomic mushroom clouds. Additionally, some 750,000 civilians have been exposed to radionuclide fall-out.

MORE THAN 200 ATOMIC TESTS PERFORMED”,

The human experiments began with the largest “Operation Crossroad” at Bikini Atoll in 1946 (a proposed series of three shots: Abel, Baker and Charlie), exposing over 42,000 men to potential harmful levels of radiation from the Bikini Lagoon. The lagoon became filled with fission products from the second underwater shot, “Baker.”

Dr. Stafford Warren head of the radiology party found that after Abel and Baker, over 120 ships, the whole lagoon, and the island itself were contaminated to dangerous levels of radiation. He cancelled the third “Charlie” shot fearing lawsuits. More than 200 other tests would follow however under 19 different “operations.”……………………

….What is even worse is the roadblocks that have been set up to prevent these survivors from seeking compensation for themselves and their families. In 1984, Senator John W. Warner, a republican from Virginia attached an amendment to a bill that prevented those exposed to radiation, or otherwise injured as the result of working for the nuclear weapons contractors, from suing either the contractor or the U.S. government. The Warner Amendment came at the request of the Reagan Administration and three contractors in atomic weapons tests: The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, the Sandia National Laboratories and Los Alamos National Laboratories, both in New Mexico. The amendment resulted in the dismissal of a number of lawsuits brought by atomic veterans and civilians employed by the nuclear contractors as well as their widows. Coupled with the Feres Doctrine, a supreme court ruling that bars veterans from seeking damage from the government while on active duty, most of the survivor’s claims have been refused.

What About the Atomic Vets – Don Rittner – timesunion.com – Albany NY

August 31, 2009 Posted by | 1, environment, USA | , , , | 2 Comments

Indian Point nuclear power plant shutdown

Shutdown puts Indian Point plant under greater scrutiny
LoHud.com By Timothy O’Connor •  August 29, 2009
BUCHANAN – Indian Point 3 faces tighter oversight by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission following Thursday night’s emergency shutdown of the nuclear power plant. The power plant was shut down for the second time in a little over two weeks and the fourth time since March. The plant’s turbine tripped off at 7:32 p.m…………………..

Riverkeeper, an environmental group that opposes the relicensing of Indian Point, said the shutdown bolsters its argument against renewing the licenses for 20 years.

 

 

“Another unexpected shutdown in such a short amount of time is certainly cause for concern; it demonstrates a fundamental failure to properly monitor and detect problems at the plant, and leads one to question how reliable Indian Point really is as a source of power for the region,” said Deborah Brancato, a staff attorney for Riverkeeper.

Shutdown puts Indian Point plant under greater scrutiny | LoHud.com | The Journal News

August 31, 2009 Posted by | 1, safety, USA | , , , | 1 Comment

USA desperately needing solution to nuclear waste problem

Wanted: A Nuclear Waste Solution to Replace Yucca Mountain

About.com By Larry West  30 August 09
“…………………Here is the problem:
 1. There is a lot of radioactive nuclear waste temporarily stored at sites all over the country.
2. Leaving nuclear waste in place and transporting it to some central and supposedly secure location both pose public safety and national security risks.
3. Nuclear waste can remain toxic, and potentially lethal, for 100,000 years or more (roughly equivalent to the length of time between the emergence of modern Homo sapiens and today), and no one knows whether we can safely store radioactive waste for that long.
 4. America is not going to stop producing nuclear energy and nuclear weapons; both are considered far too important to our national security.
5. Nobody wants the waste, making nuclear-waste disposal one of the most controversial NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) issues in history.

There are already about 63,000 tons of used radioactive fuel at 104 operating U.S. nuclear power plants; it is currently stored either underwater or in so-called “dry storage.” Waste from nuclear weapons production, dating back to World War II, is an even bigger problem. It is currently stored at 16 federal sites in 13 states, although most of it is at Hanford in Washington state, the Idaho National Laboratory and Savannah River in South Carolina.Quoting from the McClatchy article:“At Hanford alone, there are 53 million gallons of highly radioactive liquid waste, 2,100 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel and nearly 2,000 capsules containing radioactive cesium and strontium.

Wanted: A Nuclear Waste Solution to Replace Yucca Mountain

August 31, 2009 Posted by | 1, USA, wastes | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kazakhstan: Lingering effects of nuclear tests

60 Years After First Soviet Nuclear Test, Legacy Of Misery Lives On In Kazakhstan
Radio Free Europe, August 28, 2009

By Bruce Pannier

“First Lightning,” a 22-kiloton nuclear bomb, exploded at 7 a.m. local time on August 29, 1949, at the Semipalatinsk testing site in northern Kazakhstan.  Thousands of cases of birth defects, cancer, and neurological illnesses have since been reported in the Semipalatinsk region. Livestock living within range of the site also suffer from deformities and other defects. Continue reading

August 29, 2009 Posted by | 1, Kazakhstan, wastes | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Decommissioning aging nuclear reactors

nixing nukes 
The Wire by Matt Kanner Friday, 28 August 2009

Russian activists discuss nuclear plant decommissioning in Portsmouth
Few people are as familiar with the inherent complications of shutting down nuclear power plants as Oleg Bodrov. In 2002, the Russian nuclear engineer-physicist was attacked while walking home from his office. He suffered a serious head injury and spent weeks in the hospital.Bodrov believes the attack was motivated by his activism against a Russian plant that was re-smelting radioactive metal. Continue reading

August 29, 2009 Posted by | 1, Russia, wastes | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Europe, Bulgaria: Future of nuclear energy in doubt

NGOs discuss the future of nuclear power in Europe and Bulgaria
Radio Bulgaria Written by: Darina Grigorova
Translated by: Daniela Konstantinova 28 August 09
On 28 and 29 August the town of Svishtov is hosting the Pan-European Energy Conference. It is organized by the Coalition BeleNE, meaning No to Belene where Belene is the site for a new Bulgarian nuclear plant. The forum seeks to identify the problems of the sector and to suggest a few solutions to them. Central to the conference is the need of a new energy strategy of Bulgaria; energy efficiency; and the future of nuclear energy in Europe. Continue reading

August 29, 2009 Posted by | 1, EUROPE, politics | , , , , | Leave a comment

Over-exposure to ionising radiation


Americans overexposed to radiation
The News August 28, 2009
CHICAGO: Younger Americans are being exposed to worrisome amounts of radiation from medical scans that increase their risk of cancer, US researchers said late on Wednesday. They said the cumulative risk of repeated exposure to radiation from medical scans is a public health threat that needs to be addressed. “Even though the individual risk for any patient exposed to these kinds of doses may be small, when you add that up over millions of people, that can be a concerning population risk,” Dr. Reza Fazel of Emory University in Atlanta and colleagues wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

briefs…

August 28, 2009 Posted by | 1, environment, USA | , , , | Leave a comment

New Doubts Over Nuclear Plant Safety

Startling Revelations About Three Mile Island Raise New Doubts Over Nuclear Plant Safety

Fooling with Disaster?

CounterPunch By SUE STURGIS April 2009

“…………………It was the single worst disaster ever to befall the U.S. nuclear power industry, and Thompson was hired as a health physics technician to go inside the plant and find out how dangerous the situation was. He spent 28 days monitoring radiation releases.

Today, his story about what he witnessed at Three Mile Island is being brought to the public in detail for the first time — and his version of what happened during that time, supported by a growing body of other scientific evidence, contradicts the official U.S. government story that the Three Mile Island accident posed no threat to the public. Continue reading

August 27, 2009 Posted by | safety, USA | , , , , | Leave a comment

Malaysia: where would we put nuclear waste?

Where do we store nuclear waste?

The Sun2 Surf , Malaysia 27 August 09

THE sun has been the main energy source for all life on the planet for billions of years. In Malaysia, we are blessed with sunlight. Yet, our government is pushing for nuclear energy as if it is a safe energy alternative to save our planet from the perils of climate change.

The government seems to be brushing aside the hazards related to nuclear power plants, as if they were issues that didn’t exist or could easily be remedied in the near future………………….

From what I have seen, there is no detailed information available to the public on Malaysia’s nuclear plans. Where will the reactors be located? What type of reactors will be used? Who will be selling us the uranium to run the reactors? How much will it all cost and who will pay for it?

What about the waste generated from the proposed nuclear power plants? Where and how will Malaysia dispose its nuclear waste which remains radioactive for thousands of years…………….

….we do know that nuclear energy will produce highly radioactive waste, even if it is in small amounts, every day a nuclear plant is running. We do know that this highly radioactive waste must be disposed of somewhere on our finite planet. We do know that we have no technology to make this waste safe.

And as more countries build nuclear power plants, more of this waste is dumped into our Earth, the planet that sustains our lives.

It is unforgivable that we, as governments and responsible adults, knowingly create such dangerous waste, so that we can have “modern conveniences” today, without a concern for tomorrow.

We are already leaving our children with our legacy of global warming, and choking pollution. And now we wish to leave this massive mess of nuclear waste and closed reactor sites to our grandchildren, leaving them with  the burden of trying to figure out how to solve the problem that we ourselves had no idea how to solve.

http://www.sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=37313

August 27, 2009 Posted by | ASIA, wastes | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Indigenous people fight uranium mining in the Grand Canyon

Havasupai Gather to Halt Uranium Mining in the Grand Canyon

Brenda Norrell | August 26, 2009

Indigenous Havasupai people held a gathering to stop uranium mining in the Grand Canyon and protect ancestral Havasupai Territory, at the south rim of the Grand Canyon, in July of 2009. Indigenous peoples and activists came from the four directions, from Arizona Hopi land and from as far away as Hawaii, to participate with sacred songs and ceremonies.

For four days, Havasupai elders gathered on sacred Red Butte and listened to the legacy of uranium mining on Indian lands. They heard directly from the victims of the trail of death and cancer left behind by uranium mining corporations that were never held responsible on Pueblo and Navajo lands in the Southwest United States. They also listened to the promise of solidarity from the hundreds who gathered here to stand with them: Navajos from Big Mountain, Hualapai, Hopi, Kaibab Paiute, Paiute, Aztecs, and other American Indians from throughout the Americas.

The Havasupai Nation, with the Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, and Grand Canyon Trust, sponsored the gathering to halt uranium mining on Red Butte, July 23-26, 2009. Supai elders gave testimony for official U.S. records in their Havasupai (Pai) language and in English. Supai traditional singers sang as a camp was established on this mesa where Toronto-based Denison Mines is threatening to reopen a uranium mine.

Recent congressional legislation protects the Grand Canyon from new mining claims, but does not deter mining under existing claims held by Denison and others………………

………. “In Numbers, There is Strength”

During the panel, Larry King, Navajo from Church Rock, NM, told the gathering how he worked for the United Nuclear Corporation from 1975 to 1983 as an underground mine surveyor. King said he has lived all his life in Church Rock and still raises his cattle on the land where he grew up. Now, a community activist, he said Navajos in the communities of Church Rock, Pinedale, Coyote Canyon, and Iyanbito, NM, have suffered greatly from uranium mining.

…………… Speaking of the corporations who have contaminated this region for decades, Pino said, “Why would they want to mine uranium in one of the natural wonders of the world like the Grand Canyon? If they will mine uranium here, they will mine uranium anywhere. They have no heart, they have no soul.”

http://americas.irc-online.org/am/6386

August 27, 2009 Posted by | indigenous issues, USA | , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘Fourth Generation’ Nuclear Power

ENERGY BULLETIN by Jim Green 25 August 09

‘Integral fast reactors’ and other ‘fourth generation’ nuclear power concepts have been gaining attention, in part because of comments by US climate scientist James Hansen.

…… There are two main problems……. nuclear power could at most make a modest contribution to climate change abatement, mainly because it is used almost exclusively for electricity generation which accounts for about one-quarter of global greenhouse emissions. Continue reading

August 27, 2009 Posted by | 2 WORLD, ENERGY | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Russia’s nuclear legacy

Bowermaster’s Adventures — Russia’s nuclear legacy
Gadling.comby Jon Bowermaster
 Aug 24th 2009

Just around the corner from Petropavlovsk, ten miles by land or sea, located across Avachinskaya Bay on a small peninsula called Krasheninnikova sits Russia’s largest nuclear submarine base. It is off limits to outsiders and a shell of what it was during the Soviet Union’s heyday. Today – judging by a simple Google map search – there are just a half-dozen active nuclear subs sitting at its docks. Worrying to those who pay attention to such things are the shadows on the far edge of the docks on the same map, indicating somewhere between a dozen and twenty subs piled up next to each other. They are said to be at varying degrees of decommissioning………………….
The operation of nuclear-powered submarines generates considerable amounts of nuclear waste. Liquid and solid radioactive wastes need to be removed from submarines and stored. In addition, periodically the submarine needs to be refueled, thus spent fuel needs to be removed from the submarine and also stored. Decommissioning a nuclear submarine generates these streams of waste and in addition, the refueled reactor compartment must be dealt with…………………

This is from a U.S. State Department report: “In Russia every step of the process is facing problems. The support complex which was already in poor shape and accident-prone during Soviet times has been particularly burdened in the last few years. Shore-side waste sites are full of low-level radioactive waste and spent fuel. Shipments of the spent fuel for reprocessing have been delayed due to lack of funds and equipment. The service ships, which unload the spent fuel from submarines, are also full and in poor shape (and some have suffered accidents).

 The shipyards where the work is done are facing financial shortages, power blackouts and strikes. There are no final land-based storage sites for decommissioned reactor compartments removed from submarines, so they are being stored afloat in bays near naval bases. Finally, contamination is widespread at waste storage sites in the North and Far East due to accidents. Lower-level contamination is thought to plague virtually every support facility for the fleet. In addition, accidents on submarines have lead to contamination of the surrounding area.

Bowermaster’s Adventures — Russia’s nuclear legacy | Gadling.com

August 25, 2009 Posted by | 1, Russia, wastes | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Radioactive wreckage, landmines blight Iraq

Radioactive wreckage, landmines blight Iraq
Herald Sun By Aubrey Belford in BaghdadAugust 24, 2009 
RADIOACTIVE wreckage and tens of millions of landmines still blight Iraq after decades of war and the deadly violence that engulfed the nation after the 2003 invasion, the environment minister says.Narmin Othman Hasan said a lack of funding and Iraq’s fragile security situation was hampering efforts to clean up contaminated sites across the country.She said that only a fraction of tanks and other wartime vehicles contaminated with depleted uranium have been successfully treated and disposed of by the Iraqi authorities.”We have only found 80 per cent (of the contaminated sites)… because of the (lack of) security there are still some areas we can’t reach,” she estimated.The twin menaces are the legacy of decades of conflict: the 1980-1988 war with neighbouring Iran, the 1991 Gulf war that followed Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait and the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq and its bloody aftermath.
……………

Depleted uranium, a radioactive metal present in armour piercing bullets used by US-led forces during the 1991 Gulf War and the 2003 invasion, and which is twice as dense as lead, has been blamed for health problems from cancer to birth defects, but much research remains inconclusive.

“All radiation is dangerous – but how much depleted uranium radiation is affecting health, that is still under study,” Ms Hasan said, a

Radioactive wreckage, landmines blight Iraq | Herald Sun

August 24, 2009 Posted by | 1, environment, Iraq | , , , , | Leave a comment

Nuclear power in India: a long string of mishaps and deception

Indian N. proliferation remains unchecked

Sultan M Hali

Pakistan Observer 15 August 09

A decade ago, a nine-month long AERB (Atomic Energy Regulatory Board) safety study of Indian reactors documented more than 130 extremely serious safety issues warranting urgent corrective measures in the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IGCAR); Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited; Uranium Corporation of India Limited: Indian Rare Earths Limited; Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC), and the Heavy Water Board. Cirus, 40 MW has history of developing radiation leaks. Candu reactors suffering from massive leakage of heavy water.

Waste tanks at BARC habitually develop major leaks. Dhruva suffers from design problems, fuel leakages. The Fast Breeder Test Reactor of 40 MW at Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam, built with French assistance, was rated ‘not safe’, and discarded. Similar reactors, like Super Phoenix of France and Monju of Japan, were also discarded because of safety hazards. A brief look at its power plants reveals the following discrepancies: Madras Atomic Power Station (MAPS) 1986—The inlets of its reactors cracked. 1988—MAPS was shut down after heavy water leaked. 1991—Tons of heavy water burst out, had frequent break downs. Rajasthan Atomic Power Plants (RAPP), Rawatbhat. Suffers from severe design faults. Reactors de-rated from 220 MW to 100 MW. Shut down number of times from 1980 to 1994 due to cracks.

Narora Atomic Power Station (NAPS). On March 1993, a fire in NAPS, 180 km east of New Delhi, nearly caused a melt-down. Kakrapar Atomic Power Plants (KAPP), Gujarat – Unsafeguarded. The radiation leakages from the plants are a usual practice. Concrete containment dome of KAPS collapsed in 1994. Tarapur Atomic Power Plants (TAPP), Maharashtra. A high dosage of iodine was found in seawater around.

In 1995, the radioactive waste contaminated the water supply of nearly 3000 villagers living nearby. Russian VVER Light Water Reactors. The potential radiation leakage remains a high probability. IAEA has expressed doubts about the safety of these plants. Nuclear Fuel Complex, Hyderabad (NFC). None of facilities at NFC are under IAEA safeguards…………….

The list of Indian nuclear scientists involved in cases of proliferation is endless. Some prominent cases are enumerated: Oct 2003. An Indian Sitaram Rai Mahadevan arrested for sending blueprints of specialized valves, a critical part for nuclear plants to North Korea. 2004. Rabinder Singh, director RAW fled to US with sensitive documents. Dr Y S R Parsad helped Iran in building nuclear power plants. Dr C Surrender helped in transferring missile technology to Iran. Dr Mahesh and Mr. Panth helped Iran in enrichment technology of Uranium………….

http://pakobserver.net/200908/15/Articles03.asp

August 15, 2009 Posted by | India, secrets,lies and civil liberties | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Increased cancer deaths near nuclear power plants

Uranium and the secret society

Arch1 5 August 09

“……………………Ernest J. Sternglass of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, (”The Health Effects of Nuclear Fallout and Releases from Nuclear Power Plants.”)  has concerns that nuclear power plants have similar effect.

He pointed out that studies in the north central Texas area indicate large increases in cancer rates since the start-up of the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant in Somervell County southwest of Fort Worth. (14)

Dr. Sternglass states data indicates that cancer mortality in the counties surrounding the power plant – Somervell, Hood, Johnson and Erath – increased dramatically, 27 percent, during the second five-year period while the rate for the state increased 15 percent for the same period.(15)

In Hood County, breast cancer increased 190 percent over the previous five-year period, and total breast cancer deaths for all four counties increased by 51 percent while the statewide increase was 12 percent for the same period.

More recently, using mortality statistics from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mangano and Sherman found that in 1985-2004, the change in local child leukemia mortality (vs. the U.S.) compared to the earliest years of reactor operations were:

An increase of 13.9% near nuclear plants started 1957-1970 (oldest plants)

* An increase of 9.4% near nuclear plants started 1971-1981 (newer plants)

* A decrease of 5.5% near nuclear plants started 1957-1981 and later shut down

The 13.9% rise near the older plants suggests a potential effect of greater radioactive contamination near aging reactors, while the 5.5% decline near closed reactors suggests a link between less contamination and lower leukemia rates. Because of the large number of child leukemia deaths in the study (1292)  it makes many of the results statistically significant.

The Mangano/Sherman report follows a 2007 meta-analysis also published in the European Journal of Cancer Care by researchers from the Medical University of South Carolina.  That report reviewed 17 medical journal articles on child leukemia rates near reactors, and found that all 17 detected elevated rates.(17)

A January 2008 European Journal of Cancer article that found high rates of child leukemia near German reactors from 1980-2003 is believed to be the largest study on the topic (1592 leukemia cases)

http://arch1design.com/blog/?p=1859

August 7, 2009 Posted by | environment, USA | , , , , , | Leave a comment