nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Yet more delay at Flamanville nuclear debacle – doesn’t bode well for UK’s Hinkley Point C project

Times 27th July 2019 As French existential jokes go, little beats building a nuclear power plant
at a place called Flammable. OK, it’s actually Flamanville. But who cares
about that sort of nicety – not least when the project’s proving so
incendiary?

It was due to be up and running in 2012 at a cost of €3.3
billion. Not only that. Flaming Ville was to be the showcase for the
European Pressurised Reactor, the wizzy new tech developed by the
state-backed EDF. True, it’s living up to the pressurised bit, at least for
EDF boss Jean-Bernard Lévy.

He’s just been forced to announce another
delay: a howitzer, even by usual standards, of “more than three years”. The
end of 2022 is now the earliest start date; a delay bound to jack up
project costs that have already exploded to €10.9 billion

The reason?
France’s spoilsport nuclear safety authority has ordered EDF to repair
eight bits of dodgy welding: who’d have thought nukes had to be welded
together properly? And, yes, the whole thing is turning into a nice French
farce. Except for one thing, of course: the joke’s on us.

Flamanville is the prototype for our very own nuclear disaster: the £20 billion Hinkley
Point C. It’s being built by EDF and the Chinese in return for the
contractual right to fleece UK consumers for 35 years: an index-linked,
guaranteed £92.50 per megawatt hour that’s twice the wholesale price. Even
better, the 3,200MW Hinkley is the planned forerunner for a fleet of new
nukes.

Indeed, so thrilling is the prospect that Greg Clark spent his dying
days as business secretary agonising over whether it might actually be
better to fleece consumers upfront instead, via his “regulated asset base”
funding model, before the plant was built. His verdict? A “consultation”,
the sort of non-decision-making for which he was deservedly sacked. Surely
someone in government can see the big picture here.

It’s not just
Flamanville that’s proving new nuclear so radioactive; a heady mix of
last-century tech, uncontrollable costs, endless delays and a dirty great
clean-up bill. EDF’s sister project, at Olkiluoto in Finland, has proved a
similar disaster. And didn’t ministers notice while their mooted plant at
Moorside was imploding that the project’s promoter, Japan’s Toshiba, was
blowing itself in the US with subsidiary Westinghouse?

No bribe was big enough, either, for Hitachi at Wylfa: no big shock when the group’s from
Fukushima-land. True, nuclear accounts for a fifth of Britain’s energy
needs. But its costs keep going up, while those of wind, solar, battery
power and carbon capture are falling. And they don’t require dangerous
clean-ups. Yes, maybe it’s too late to stop Hinkley. But someone in Boris’s
new team must see that new nuclear’s a route to torching money. Flammable
is all the evidence they need.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/5268801e-afd9-11e9-84cf-31ddba0e0fae

July 29, 2019 Posted by | politics, UK | Leave a comment

How did Ohio’s nuclear industry get a $1.1billion bailout? -dark money did the job!

The Ohio legislation reads as if it were designed specifically to undermine the planet’s continued capacity to support a steady human population.

It even ends programs aimed at encouraging Ohio residents to reduce power consumption, through upgrades to appliances or heating and cooling systems

OHIO REPUBLICANS BALKED AT A NUCLEAR BAILOUT, SO THE INDUSTRY ELECTED NEW REPUBLICANS — AND WALKED AWAY WITH $1.1 BILLION The Intercept,   Ryan Grim,  , Akela Lacy  25 July 19  ON TUESDAY, a dark-money effort linked primarily to the Ohio nuclear industry delivered an audacious payoff, as a newly elected state legislature overcame years of opposition to shower a $1.1 billion bailout on two state nuclear plants.

Several dark-money groups spent millions to replace key Republican state legislators in the spring of 2018, followed by a furious lobbying campaign to make sure those new lawmakers elected a new House speaker — one who was amenable to the subsidy. The nuclear industry in Ohio has been on the brink of failure for several years, but previous legislatures had objected to a bailout, reading the writing on the wall: Nuclear power is neither a cost-effective solution for power nor an effective response to climate change, despite hopes for its success.

In April 2018, two nuclear plants, both owned by the electric utility FirstEnergy, filed for bankruptcy and have been threatening to cease operations if not bailed out. They were under increasing pressure to compete with cheaper alternatives, ranging from natural gas to wind and solar. The bankruptcy filings give a glimpse into the company’s political spending: more than $30 million from 2018-2019 on lobbying and campaigns in Ohio and Pennsylvania (where the company also sought a bailout, so far unsuccessfully).

The dark-money effort deployed a variety of vehicles that went by names like the Conservative Leadership Alliance and the Ohio Clean Energy Jobs Alliance. Murray Energy, a coal company, also gave heavily to current state House Speaker Larry Householder and his allied candidates, and the bailout from Ohio also includes subsidies to prop up failing coal plants in the state.

The payoff is extraordinary in degree Continue reading →

July 27, 2019 Posted by | politics, USA | Leave a comment

Surprise surprise! UK’s New Prime Minister Boris Johnson is a big fan of the nuclear industry

In Cumbria 25th July 2019 New Prime Minister Boris Johnson has pledged his support for a nuclear renaissance, the Barrow-based Dreadnaught submarine programme and Northern
Powerhouse Rail in his maiden speech. On nuclear, Copeland MP Trudy
Harrison asked him: “Does the Prime Minister agree that the time is now
for a nuclear renaissance and that Copeland is the centre of nuclear
excellence?”

Mr Johnson replied: “It is time for a nuclear renaissance
and I believe passionately that nuclear must be part of our energy mix and
she is right to campaign for it and it will help us to meet our carbon
targets.”

His comments were made just days after the Government launched
a consultation into funding large-scale nuclear power stations and an £18
million Government investment into the development of small modular
reactors through a consortium led by Rolls-Royce, and including the
National Nuclear Laboratory, Wood and Nuvia. Opinions are being sought
between now and October 14 on a proposed Nuclear Regulated Asset Base (RAB)
model to fund large power stations.

https://www.in-cumbria.com/news/17795753.boris-johnson-pledges-back-nuclear-renaissance-dreadnought-submarine-programme-northern-powerhouse-rail/

July 27, 2019 Posted by | politics, UK | Leave a comment

Ohio takes a backward leap, as Ohio Governor Signs Coal and Nuclear Bailout at Expense of Renewable Energy

Ohio Governor Signs Coal and Nuclear Bailout at Expense of Renewable Energy

Opponents fear the law will send the growing wind and solar industry to neighboring states while Ohio homeowners are stuck boosting old, uneconomical power plants.  Inside Climate News. Dan Gearino, 26 July 19

July 27, 2019 Posted by | politics, USA | Leave a comment

UK Nuclear Finance: From No Subsidies to Nuclear Tax

July 27, 2019 Posted by | politics, UK | Leave a comment

A layman’s guide to the ‘Regulated Asset Base’ that will fund Sizewell C nuclear power plant.

July 25, 2019 Posted by | business and costs, politics, UK | Leave a comment

UK’s love-in with “an innovative funding model” does not hide the hideous expense of nuclear power

Guardian 23rd July 2019 Let’s face it: nuclear power is hideously dear and far from ideal. The
government should be backing renewables, not tying itself to an expensive
nuclear future. That bill-payers got stuffed in the deal that brought the
Hinkley Point C project into existence is beyond dispute these days.

Even government ministers barely quibble with the National Audit Office’s
assessment that consumers will be paying through the nose for 35 years.

Instead, the defence has tended to run along these lines: don’t worry,
we’ve triggered a “resurgence” in the nuclear industry in the UK and
the next reactors will be relative bargains.

Now here’s the government’s latest effort to resurrect the show – “an innovative
funding model”. Of course, it’s not really innovative. The “regulated
asset base” (RAB) approach, which could be used at Sizewell B in Suffolk,
and is intended to copy the design of Hinkley, is common in other parts of
the utility world.

Aside from exposing consumers to the cost of overruns,
RAB in effect also requires them to provide financing at zero interest, a
point made by the National Infrastructure Commission last year. Little
wonder, then, that the juice should be cheaper than Hinkley’s – some of
the costs will be hidden from view.

The same NIC report said: “There is limited experience of using the RAB model for anything as complex and risky as nuclear.” Second, no financing model can disguise the core truth about
nuclear – the technology is hideously expensive. Even after recognising
the need to have secure “baseload” supplies, it recommended
commissioning only one more nuclear plant, on top of Hinkley, before 2025.

That remains a commonsense analysis. Renewables are winning the price race.
Let us pray, then, that a love-in with RAB does not reignite ministerial
fantasies about a “resurgence” in nuclear. We don’t want a
resurgence. We want to build as few new reactors as possible.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/nils-pratley-on-finance/2019/jul/23/lets-face-it-nuclear-power-is-hideously-dear-and-far-from-ideal

July 25, 2019 Posted by | business and costs, politics, UK | Leave a comment

UK government commits to ordering mini nuclear reactors from Rolls Royce

Rolls-Royce gets government commitment for mini nuclear reactors UK aero-engine maker seeks to spearhead development of export-led industry https://www.ft.com/content/32ee2100-ad43-11e9-8030-530adfa879c2 Sylvia Pfeifer in London, 24 July 19, 

Although the initial commitment is just £18m, it will allow the consortium to mature the design of the reactors. The move, which is subject to a final sign-off, would still require significant levels of additional investment before the reactors can become a commercial reality. The UK aero-engine maker has long argued that its technology in this sphere should be regarded as a “national endeavour” to develop nuclear skills that can be used to create an export-led industry.

A consortium spokesperson said on Tuesday that the £18m investment would be used to “mature the design, address the considerable manufacturing technology requirements and to progress the regulatory licensing process”. He added: “We believe with early co-investment by the government, this power station design is a compelling commercial opportunity.”

Rolls-Royce and its team, which includes Laing O’Rourke and Arup, was one of several consortiums that bid in an initial government-sponsored competition launched in 2015 to find the most viable technology for a new generation of small nuclear modular reactors (SMRs). Most of these will not be commercial until the 2030s

Supporters argue that they can deliver nuclear power at lower cost and reduced risk. They will draw on modular manufacturing techniques that will reduce construction risk, which has plagued larger-scale projects. However, when a nuclear sector deal was finally unveiled last June, the government allocated funding only for more advanced modular reactors.

MRs, which typically use water-cooled reactors similar to existing nuclear power stations, were omitted from funding even though they were closer to becoming commercial. Rolls-Royce threatened last summer that it would shut down the project if there was no meaningful support from the government.

Ministers have in recent months scrambled to recast Britain’s energy policy after the collapse of plans to build several large reactors and on Monday evening published proposals to finance new nuclear plants by having taxpayers pay upfront through their energy bills. The government added that, as part of its plans to fund advanced nuclear technologies, it would make an “initial award” of up to £18m under the industrial strategy challenge fund to the Rolls-Royce-led consortium in the autumn. The consortium has said any government funding will be matched in part by contributions from the companies as well as by raising funds from third-party organisations.

July 25, 2019 Posted by | business and costs, politics, Small Modular Nuclear Reactors, UK | Leave a comment

In Texas oil town Andrews , there’s support for hosting nuclear waste dump

July 25, 2019 Posted by | politics, USA, wastes | 2 Comments

USA’s Sensible, Timely Relief for America’s Nuclear Districts Economic Development (STRANDED) Act

Wiscasset could get $8 million for storing nuclear waste  https://www.pressherald.com/2019/07/24/wiscasset-could-get-8-million-for-storing-nuclear-waste/   A bill before Congress would compensate communities who store spent nuclear fuel that the federal government has failed to remove.

July 25, 2019 Posted by | politics, USA, wastes | Leave a comment

UK consumers to start paying for nuclear reactors before they are built

Guardian 23rd July 2019 The government has confirmed plans for consumers to begin paying for new nuclear reactors before they are built, and for taxpayers to pay a share of
any cost overruns or construction delays. In a consultation document
launched on Monday night, officials said the model is “essential” to
attract private investors to back the UK’s new nuclear ambitions at a
price that is affordable for bill payers. The public purse would also
compensate nuclear investors if the project was scrapped. The new funding
structure could be used to prop up EDF Energy’s £16bn plans for a new
nuclear reactor at Sizewell B in Suffolk, which was left in doubt after
fierce criticism of the costs surrounding the Hinkley Point C project in
Somerset.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/jul/23/new-uk-nuclear-plants-government-cost

July 25, 2019 Posted by | business and costs, politics, UK | Leave a comment

Nuclear developer Horizon says UK government funding essential for restarting Wylfa

Nuclear funding proposal ‘essential’ for restarting Wylfa, BBC, 23 July 2019  

New ways to fund nuclear projects could be an “essential step” to restarting the shelved Wylfa Newydd scheme, developer Horizon has said.

Proposals announced by the UK government include electricity customers paying for part of nuclear schemes’ costs upfront through bills.

The £15bn scheme on Anglesey was suspended in January because of rising costs.

A Horizon spokesman said it “warmly welcomed” the announcement. He added: “As we said when we announced the suspension of our projects, a new funding and financing model is one of the essential steps if we are to potentially restart our development activities.

“We will now look in detail at what the government has set out and continue our engagement with them on this issue.”

The suggested model, known as RAB (Regulated Asset Base), has already been used to finance some large infrastructure projects, including the £4.2bn Thames Tideway “super-sewer”.

It allows investors to receive returns before the projects have been completed. The government said RAB had “the potential to attract significant investment for new nuclear projects at a lower cost to customers.”

But it said “significant challenges” remained, including raising capital and creating appropriate risk sharing arrangements.

The government has invited responses to the proposals, set out in a consultation paper. A White Paper on energy is expected later in the year……https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-49085776

July 25, 2019 Posted by | business and costs, politics, UK | Leave a comment

UK Ministers insist on new nuclear plants, on the premise of ‘climate action’

Leaked government analysis reveals UK demand for new nuclear power plants, Times, 23 July 19,  Britain needs to build a fleet of nuclear or carbon-capture power plants equivalent to a dozen Hinkley Point Cs to hit climate change targets, a leaked government analysis suggests.

Up to 40 gigawatts of non-intermittent low carbon power stations could be needed in 2050 to reduce Britain’s emissions to “net zero”, ministers believe.

Just one is under construction: EDF’s 3.2-gigawatt Hinkley Point C nuclear power station in Somerset.
Greg Clark, the business secretary, disclosed the estimates to industry in a private meeting on Monday as his department published plans for a new funding model to support such plants.

The proposed “regulated asset base” (RAB) model would see consumers pay for the plants on their bills during construction, but would expose them and taxpayers to the… (subscribers only)  https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/reforms-in-funding-planned-to-meet-demand-for-nuclear-power-plants-j3n0mln0l

July 25, 2019 Posted by | politics, UK | Leave a comment

In UK, consumers on hook for cost overruns at nuclear plants

Consumers on hook for cost overruns at nuclear plants, Emily Gosden, Times 23rd July 2019 ,Energy consumers and taxpayers could have to pay for cost overruns at new nuclear plants after the government backed a funding model proposed by EDF.

The business department said last night it believed the “regulated asset
base” model that the French energy giant wants for its proposed Sizewell
plant in Suffolk could reduce consumer bills compared with the subsidy
contract used to back the £20 billion Hinkley Point plant EDF is building
in Somerset.
A consultation document published last night confirms that
consumers would, however, be asked to start paying for the plants on energy
bills while they were still under construction and to share in the risks of
cost overruns.
In the case of an extreme overrun, the government –
effectively the taxpayer – could either have to step in and pay the extra
cost or scrap the project and pay compensation to investors. Under the
regulated asset base model, the developer would receive a regulated price
to give it a return on its investment expenditure, including during the
construction period, and this would be levied on energy bills.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/17cbe1b8-acbd-11e9-b657-11944f524f2a

July 25, 2019 Posted by | business and costs, politics, UK | Leave a comment

Vote about to happen on subsidising Ohio nuclear power stations

July 23, 2019 Posted by | politics, USA | Leave a comment