nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Nuclear-based fantasies are holding back real climate action

SMR Education Task Force, June 22, 2023,  https://crednb.ca/2023/06/22/nuclear-based-fantasies-are-holding-back-real-climate-action/

Today a network of groups across Canada announces the launch of the SMR Education Task Force to share under-reported facts about small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) with members of Parliament and provincial legislatures.

We begin with the latest report from Canada Energy Regulator (CER). This federal document, called Canada’s Energy Future, projects that enough new nuclear reactors (SMRs) will be operational by 2050 to more than double Canada’s existing nuclear electricity generation.

Canada currently has 19 operating power reactors, built over 58 years. The new report claims that we will build more than 50 new reactors in much less time.

This fantasy has no basis in reality. It is inconsistent with independent analyses by energy researchers not tied to the nuclear industry. One such study in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists makes it clear that SMRs have at best a marginal role to play in a truly effective climate action plan. SMRs fail the tests of timeliness and affordability – they take too long and cost too much.

In addition to Ontario and Alberta, the CER report imagines deploying SMRs in Quebec and British Columbia. This is news to citizens in those provinces. BC ratepayers have rejected nuclear power in the past, and Quebec phased out of nuclear power in 2012. With every reactor comes long-lived radioactive waste — including the structure itself, which is a provincial responsibility to safeguard for thousands of years after shutdown.

Yesterday, the Coalition for Responsible Energy Development in New Brunswick (CRED-NB) sent a letter to Canada’s Natural Resources Minister reminding him that more than 120 civil society, public interest, faith-based and Indigenous groups across Canada have signed a statement warning that SMRs are a dirty, dangerous distraction from urgent climate action.

These groups understand that responding to the climate emergency does not require gambling on untested nuclear reactors. They know that energy efficiency measures and renewable sources cost at least 3 to 7 times less than nuclear power per tonne of carbon emissions avoided.

The groups oppose using public funds earmarked for climate action to support the nuclear industry’s eager experimentation with novel reactor designs. We are challenging the government to release the research and data that support its nuclear-based strategy.

Nuclear promoters, with long-standing allies embedded in the federal and provincial governments, are making unsubstantiated promises about SMRs in an audacious attempt to grab as much public funding as possible to keep their dying industry alive.

Worldwide, nuclear’s share of global electricity has dropped over the last 25 years from 17% to less than 10%. The International Energy Agency forecasts that more than 90% of all new electricity installations worldwide over the next 5 years will be non-hydro renewables.

The industry’s money-grab will succeed only if our public representatives remain uninformed about the facts. That is why we are pleased to announce the SMR Education Task Force and look forward in the months ahead to share information about SMRs based on independent science and research.

June 25, 2023 - Posted by | Canada, climate change, Small Modular Nuclear Reactors

1 Comment »

  1. If the other provinces of Canada besides British Columbia and Quebec know about the research, work and plans of The Solutions Project (http://thesolutionsproject.org/)and the Rocky Mountaing Institute, (http://rmi.org/) they would learn that nuclear power, in all of its forms from old boiling water, pressurized-boiling water to SMR’s, are all too dangerous, too expensive,take too long to build safely, and tare otally unnecessary for any of our energy needs. Visit their websites, download the plans.

    There are plans for 146 different nations from around the world and for all 50 of the United States, to meet the energy needs without nuclear power or fossil fuel by using just wind, hydroelectric, photovoltaic and geothermal power. We will not “wreck our economy,” in the process nor “starve and freeze in the dark” in the process.

    Like in the United States, the biggest obstical to transitioning to renewable energy is not the technology nor the lack of raw materials, it is the political will, because of the lobbiests campain money to the elected leaders in the government of all parties, who continue to promote both nuclear power as “green energy,” and the continued use of fossil fuel, while we continue to cook the planet, destroying our ecosystems and life support systems, all for the quick fast buck, i.e. profit addiction.

    Comment by paulrodenlearning | June 25, 2023 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.