The nuclearization of space — Beyond Nuclear International

Fast track to Mars could come at terrible price
The nuclearization of space — Beyond Nuclear International
1 Comment »
Leave a reply to theunmanspeaks Cancel reply
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Dr. Grossman finishes, “Indeed, said the article [about a scheme to harvest solar power on the Moon], a huge amount of solar power energy could be generated on the moon and be beamed back to Earth.”
Although Dr. Grossman is right about the lunacy of launching large reactors to serve the deeply dubious goals of space militarization, Moon commuting, and the like, it’s unfortunate that he ends his piece by promoting this almost equally absurd and dangerous scheme: harvesting solar power on the Moon and shipping it back to earth via terawatt-strength microwave beams.
Absurd, because we already harvest solar power on the Earth, now producing “the cheapest electricity in history” in favorable markets (International Energy Agency, 2020) — cheaper than coal, gas, nuclear, or even wind and getting yet cheaper all the time. How could solar panels on the Moon ever possibly compete? Dangerous, because a trillion-watt (or even 100 billion-watt) power beam narrow enough to be economically collectable Earthside would present an obvious hazard if diverted accidentally or deliberately to, say, a city. Build a power beam strong enough to make a significant contribution to Earth’s electric supply and you’ve built a death ray.
The lunar-solar idea is so utterly cockeyed in terms of practicality, economy, and safety that it is startling that Dr. Grossman would credit it for a second, much less give it prominence at the end of his article.