Extradition Law UK update critique from Statewatch #Assange

Julian Assange Aug 2014
Summary
The revised Returns Directive is supposed to “speed up return procedures, prevent
absconding and secondary movements, and increase the overall EU return rate, in full respect of fundamental rights.” This final point, however, is extremely doubtful. As this analysis makes clear, the key aim of the changes is to restrict individual rights in the name of improving the functioning of the EU’s deportation system. EU lawmakers should discard the proposal and focus on alternative measures that would be less harmful to individuals.
Jane Kilpatrick
September 2019
Link to full report
New UK-US Extradition Treaty
On 31 March, David Blunkett, UK Home Secretary, signed a new Extradition Treaty on behalf of the UK
with his United States counterpart, Attorney General Tom Ashcroft, ostensibly bringing the US into line
with procedures between European countries. The UK parliament was not consulted at all and the text
was not public available until the end of May. The only justification given for the delay was for
“administrative reasons”, though these did not hold-up scrutiny by the US senate, which began almost
immediately.
The UK-US Treaty has three main effects:
– (1) it removes the requirement on the US to provide prima facie evidence when requesting the
extradition of people from the UK but maintains the requirement on the UK to satisfy the “probable
cause” requirement in the US when seeking the extradition of US nationals;
– (2) it removes or restricts key protections currently open to suspects and defendants;
– (3) it implements the EU-US Treaty on extradition, signed in Washington on 25 June 2003, but far
exceeds the provisions in this agreement.
An analysis of the new UK-US Treaty – which will replace the 1972 UK-US Treaty – follows below,
together with a number of relevant cases and issues that raise serious concern about the new
agreement (and those between the EU and US).
Source pdf
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- January 2026 (61)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment