Debunking the #Amazon #fires starting in #Bolivia instead of #Brazil Exclusive to nuclear-news.net
In the recent week I have seen reports that fires may have started in Bolivia and spread east. The following screenshots show, over the course of the last weeks, that there was a fire near the Brazil Bolivia border but was put out a few weeks ago.
Then, in the last week the fires start in earnest mostly on the Brazil side and in the last week show the fires raging in Brazil and moving west towards Bolivia.
Posted by Shaun McGee aka arclight2011
Posted to Nuclear-news.net
Posted on 27th August 2019
Prevailing winds Current wind charts show winds blowing to the Northwest
The screenshots below are from a video posted on twitter showing Carbon (smoke) in the air and the more lighter shades are increased density (location of fires, sources)
Source of video;

3 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- December 2025 (286)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS







Things are getting weird here. I hope people over thwre and australia will be ok. They have gone mad. If the fascist things that rule begin rounding people up including me, i do not care. The nuclearists already destroyed my family in this evil country… Come get me do yur best evil devils. You have the panopticon on everything and everyone even without the devices.
I ran a tracert of my computer in 2006 in msdos mode and found the nsa scanned my computer every 15 minutes. These evil little control monkey devills are subhuman. Thhey are not like us. They have no souls
it has been known for at least fifteen years that high bone density profoundly increases the risk of breast cancer — and particularly malignant breast cancer — the issue has been given little to no attention, likely because it contradicts the propaganda expounded by mainstream woman’s health advocacy organizations.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1173359/
“The study, led by Dr Jane Cauley of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, followed the health history of 8905 women who were 65 years or older and without breast cancer.
After six years it found that the women who scored highest on three types of bone mineral density tests (performed on the bones of the wrist, arm, and heel) were also more likely to develop breast cancer (Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001;93:930-936).
During the six year period a total of 315 women (3.5%) developed breast cancer.
After adjusting for other risk factors that contribute to breast cancer, such as age and obesity, the investigators found that the risk for women with the highest bone density for all three skeletal sites was 2.7 times greater than that for women with the lowest measurement of bone density for all three sites.”
“The results suggest that bone mineral density is one of the most powerful predictors of breast cancer, especially advanced breast cancer, among elderly women,” Dr Cauley said.
There is a direct mechanism of action of increased bone density and an increas of serum levels of radionuclides bioccumulated in bone matrix being released in a steady-stae into the blood and plasma.
The link of high bone density and breast cancer is truly related to Radionuclide pharmacokinetics and depositions.
Everyone in the world has some stroontium 90 and uranium substrates in their bones now. People in the developed nuclear counntries, have the highest concentrations in their bodies.
Bone matrix is a primary storing site for the certain radionuclides in the body.
Bioccumulated radionuclides mimic calcium and phosphorus .
Much of the Stontium 90, radium, and uranium biocumulate in the human body ends up in bone matrix.
Americium, polonium, thorium and some plutonium ends up there as well.. When the density of the bone matrix is changed from increased bone density, there is an increase in the steady level of radionuclides into blood and plasma, resulting in dramatic increases of exposure of the radionuclides to soft tissue, like Breast tissues.
There are few studies on this like most other studies related to radionuclide toxicology and pharmacokinetics of bioccumulation. The mechanism of bone density increases and increases of more bioccumulated radionuclides released into the plasma is well known and experimentally veirfied.
Excellent articles Arclight! You, D’un, and Christina are geniuses and saints. Truly the best people in the world IMHO
Thankyou
Thank you Ken, Hope I can keep up the pace 🙂 Namaste