If Democrats take over Congress in November, there’ll be cuts to USA’s nuclear weapons spending

Cuts to nuclear spending and special ops oversight: Expectations for new congressional leadership https://www.defensenews.com/smr/defense-news-conference/2018/09/05/cuts-to-nuclear-spending-and-oversight-of-socom-what-to-expect-from-a-democratic-hasc/

Speaking at the second annual Defense News Conference, Rep. Adam Smith, the Washington representative who would become the HASC chairman if the parties flip, laid out his vision for what a Democratic HASC would look like.

Top of the list in what might change between a Republican and Democratic HASC: “nuclear weapons,” according to Smith.

“I think the Republican party and the nuclear posture review contemplates a lot more nuclear weapons than I — and I think most Democrats — think we need. We also think the idea of low-yield nuclear weapons are extremely problematic going forward,” Smith said. “When we look at the larger budget picture, that’s not the best place to spend the money.”

Smith later added that the expected price tag for upgrading America’s nuclear weapons — one potential estimate was $1.2 trillion over the next 30 years before the Pentagon’s plans for two new systems were revealed — meant the U.S. “certainly can’t afford it.”

“Where can we save money? Where are we spending money where we shouldn’t be spending money?,” he asked rhetorically, adding he believes America can improve deterrence by using those funds on conventional capabilities. “I think nuclear weapons are an area where we are spending too much.”

More broadly, Smith said he wanted the HASC to “step up” on oversight of what he called an “expansive” military taking part in operations all over the globe.

He pointed to Niger as an example where special operators were supposed to only be involved in a train and equip mission, but exceeded the boundaries of that operation — a situation that led to the deaths of four Americans last October.

“The Trump White House, by and large, has let the Pentagon have a lot of free rein,” Smith said. “I think that’s inappropriate, and I think there is a real role for congress to step in where the White House has stepped back to make sure our military is not engaged in ways” contrary to American values or interests.

He also called out the ongoing conflict in Yemen as a “major problem.”

“I don’t think we are pursuing the right policy there,” he said. “It is leading to the largest humanitarian crisis on the planet.”

Given that Democrats in both the Senate and House have attempted legislation to investigate American support for the Saudi coalition, Smith’s comments seem like a warning sign that greater scrutiny of that conflict in particular is on the table if the HASC flips.

Finally, Smith said he would be “actively engaged” in fighting for the rights of women and members of the LGBTQ community to take part in military service however they desire.

He lashed out at the idea that, at a time of personnel shortfalls, a qualified individual could not serve “because of some bigoted bias with no basis in reality,” adding: “I think it’s wrong and something in the committee that, if I were the chairman, I would be actively involved in fighting.”

September 6, 2018 - Posted by Christina Macpherson | business and costs, politics, weapons and war

1 Comment »

Great Article!
Meanwhile Trump is destroying everything of the public benefit in mureca. Him and his racist bastard pushers are corrupt assclowns Orders in nuclear weapons manufacturing and extraction industries are way up! Meanwhile the kochs and fuko the clownites are out to destroy renewables and what is left of legitimate aspects of the Murican economy and protections
https://www.opednews.com/articles/VA-privatization-continues-by-Rick-Staggenborg–Outsourcing_Privatization_Propaganda_Suicide-180906-962.html
https://www.opednews.com/articles/VA-privatization-continues-by-Rick-Staggenborg–Outsourcing_Privatization_Propaganda_Suicide-180906-962.html Me on Twitter Message Rick Staggenborg, MD
Rick Staggenborg, MD ((# of views))
At: /rickstaggenborgmd
(You, too, can get a special OpEdNews URL. With membership. Click here.)

Volunteer a little time and make a big difference

I am a former Army and VA psychiatrist who ran for the US Senate in 2010 on a campaign based on a pledge to introduce a constitutional amendment to abolish corporate personhood.

Now that the general public is beginning to understand the importance of the issue,I am devoting much of my time to get political activists to understand that the only way to reach their goals is to establish representative democracy in the US. This will require a constiutitional amendment banning corporate campaign expenditures and limiting amounts rich individuals can spend to influence elections.

I am convinced that the only way to do this is to make support for such an amendment a campaign issue. That way, we can easily see who wants to get in Congress to represent We the People and who want to serve our interests over those of corporations who currently control the US government.

I believe that it is possible to end war if we can prove that democracy is possible. Unless we can awaken enough Americans to the fact that their government is pursuing an agenda of corporate imperialism that will enslave them along with the rest of the world if not reclaimed by We the People, we will leave our children with a legacy of pain for which we cannot be forgiven.

Ultimately, endless war is a symptom of a disease that will destroy human civilization if not eradicated. There is no “us” vs “them.” Our fates are intertwined. None of us gets out alive. The question is, how will we have lived?
http://www.soldiersforpeaceinternational.org

Comment by John WINBORNE | September 7, 2018 | Reply