Nuclear Waste Fuel can be Lethal within a Minute!

Source:
Allan Hedin
“Spent nuclear fuel – how dangerous is it? A report from the project “Description of risk’ ”
SKB Report – Technical Report TR-97-13 (March 1997)
On page 21 of this report at para 3.5.2: the following two figures are provided:
1) the lethal dose is given as 5,000 ‘milli-Sieverts’ [1]
2) a dose rate of one million ‘milli-Sieverts’ per hour is quoted
(one year after one tonne of waste fuel has been taken out of a reactor – when standing at one metre distance from the waste fuel rod)
From these two figures it is then calculated [2] that:
To stand one metre from:
- one tonne of waste fuel,
- one year after its removal from the reactor
– would kill you in twenty seconds.
On page 23 of the NDA ‘Disposability’ report for Westinghouse ‘AP1000’ [3] type fuel [4], a weight of approximately 600 kilograms per ‘AP1000’ fuel assembly is quoted. (see Table B4)
The figure quoted for the weight of an ‘EPR’ [5] fuel assembly is also roughly 600 kilograms. [6] ( See page 29 – Table B9)
Therefore:
- One fuel assembly of either ‘AP1000’ or ‘EPR’ type fuel weighs roughly half a tonne.
- This means that standing next to one of either of these fuel assemblies could kill you in about a minute.[7]
Dr Rachel E J Western BA(Oxon) PhD MRSC
16th March 2018
[1] milli = one thousandth – (for defintion of ‘Sievert’ see ‘Technical section at the start of this document )
[2] (by reference to Figures 3-8a and b ( See pp 22- 23 )
[3] ‘AP’ – Advanced Passive
[4] “Geological Disposal Generic Design Assessment: Summary of Disposability Assessment for Wastesand Spent Fuel arising from Operation of the Westinghouse AP1000 ”
NDA ( Oct ’09 )
[5] ‘EPR’ – European Pressurised Reactor
[6] “Geological Disposal Generic Design Assessment: Summary of Disposability Assessment for Wastes and Spent Fuel arising from Operation of the UK EPR”
NDA Technical Note no. 11261814
NDA – October 2009
[7] assuming that the waste fuel had been removed from the reactor one year earlier and that you were standing one metre away.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- January 2026 (201)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS





Leave a comment