nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry

31 out of 32 South Carolina lawmakers received money from the utility and owners of failed V.C. Summer nuclear project

SCANA has given money to nearly all South Carolina lawmakers probing the failed nuclear project, Post and Courier, By Thad Moore tmoore@postandcourier.com, Sep 2, 2017  All but one of the 32 lawmakers investigating the demise of the V.C. Summer nuclear project have taken campaign contributions from the utility responsible for building it, highlighting the extent of the power industry’s lobbying efforts in Columbia.

The overwhelming majority have received funds from SCANA Corp., parent company to S.C. Electric & Gas Co., its subsidiaries and political action committees within the last two years, according to a Post and Courier review of campaign finance records. They include 14 who took contributions this year as uncertainties surrounding the construction project mounted.

Those lawmakers, who sit on twin House and Senate committees formed last month, are now tasked with probing what went wrong with the project, which cost $9 billion before construction was halted in July. They’re also responsible for forming ideas on how to limit the financial fallout and create safeguards that prevent another energy failure like it.

The lone lawmaker who didn’t receive contributions was Republican Kevin Hardee of Loris, which is outside of SCE&G’s service territory.

SCANA doesn’t cut big checks — it typically gives individual legislators $500 to $1,000, the maximum for a single election cycle — but critics say the steady dribble of contributions helped build warm relationships under the Statehouse dome.

The Cayce-based utility has also given tens of thousands of dollars to legislative caucus groups, and it spends around $200,000 a year to lobby the General Assembly, with a crew of eight lobbyists to monitor legislation and advance its message.

“They make them because they’re basically trying to gain access,” said Frank Knapp, president and chief executive of the S.C. Small Business Chamber of Commerce, which has called for a ban on utility contributions. “They’re just not after good government. They’re looking for some return on their investment.”

[on original: – details of names of politicians and amounts of money given to each]

Broad reach

The lawmakers who took donations from SCANA come from both sides of the political aisle and from all corners of the state. Some sit on standing committees that regulate utilities, but others are typically disconnected from the day-to-day policymaking that affects power companies.

Political observers say it’s little surprise that nearly all of them received funds from SCANA.

Utilities in the heavily regulated business of making and delivering electricity are among the biggest spenders in South Carolina politics, pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars a year into lobbying efforts.

Last year, for instance, power companies made up three of the top 10 lobbying spenders in Columbia, state records show.

Aside from SCANA, they included the Electric Cooperatives of South Carolina, a trade group representing 20 small power providers known as “co-ops” across the state that helped lobby for legislation that helped finance the reactors.

Another is Duke Energy, the state’s biggest energy provider. The Charlotte-based giant, which was once courted unsuccessfully as a partner in the V.C. Summer project, dropped a separate plan to build nuclear reactors in Cherokee County last month.

The extent of the industry’s spending has come under closer scrutiny, however, as the General Assembly begins to unpack the policies and processes that advanced the now-scuttled nuclear investment and what pushed it off track.

SCANA and its partner, state-owned power company Santee Cooper, canceled the project after lead contractor Westinghouse Electric filed for bankruptcy protection, wiping out its promises for a fixed cost after years of delays and cost overruns. The utilities said their analysis found that the two reactors being built in Fairfield County would cost at least $21 billion in all, nearly double initial estimates.

Lawmakers including House Speaker Jay Lucas have said the Legislature played a role in helping get the project off the ground………

Calls for reform

The breadth of the utilities’ efforts in Columbia has raised the ire of the project’s critics, some of whom have called for a prohibition on campaign giving from power companies.

Tom Clements, a Columbia-based adviser to Friends of the Earth, said the legislative panels should return the contributions they’ve received from utilities and agree not to accept them in the future. He added that “a cloud’s going to hang over them as long as they’ve accepted money and not returned it.”

The idea of a ban on utilities’ contributions was first floated last month by the “Stop the Blank Check” coalition, a group of eight organizations that opposed the V.C. Summer project. The initiative includes the S.C. Small Business Chamber and the League of Women Voters, and it calls for a ban on gifts to PACs and legislative caucuses, which have higher contribution limits.

“The utilities should make their case to legislators without the warm goodwill that money can so easily generate,” the groups wrote in a platform outlining their goals.

Other states have limited regulated industries’ political activities, but for the most part, they prohibit donations to regulators, not all politicians. At least one state, New Jersey, has a blanket prohibition, and 22 have banned all corporate giving, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

With the Legislature out of session and its special committees only beginning their work, it’s not yet clear whether those calls will gain traction.

Two members of the special panels, including Ott, have unloaded contributions from SCANA. The other, freshman Rep. Micah Caskey, R-West Columbia, donated the funds to a Midlands charity, saying they “might undermine my neighbors’ confidence in the integrity of my part in the investigation into this debacle.”

Separately, Gov. Henry McMaster said last week that he didn’t plan to return money he’d received from SCANA or its employees when the utility held a June fundraiser supporting his 2018 gubernatorial run, where he raised some $250,000.

Campaign finance records show that the governor received contributions from some of the utility’s top executives, including CEO Kevin Marsh, who gave $2,500. Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Addison and chief nuclear officer Steve Byrne each gave $2,000. The three have been called to testify before the Legislature. http://www.postandcourier.com/business/scana-has-given-money-to-nearly-all-south-carolina-lawmakers/article_2a29f188-8db1-11e7-8b51-a359b0947198.html

 Reach Thad Moore at 843-937-5703. Follow him on Twitter @thadmoore.

 

Advertisements

September 4, 2017 - Posted by | politics, secrets,lies and civil liberties, USA

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: