nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

These individuals have conflicts of interest on Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise

 

  • conflict-of-interestRebranding the nuclear weapons complex won’t reform it, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Robert Alvarez, 18 Jan 15 
  • “……….Panel co-chairman Norm Augustine, former chairman and CEO of the Lockheed Martin Corporation, a major member of consortia running the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant in Tennessee, the Pantex weapons assembly and disassembly facility in Texas and the Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico.
  • Panel co-chairman Richard W. Mies, a retired US Navy admiral who is a member of the board of directors of the Babcock and Wilcox Corporation (B&W). B&W operates the NNSA’s Y-12 plant. Mies is also a board member for a consortium managing Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos National Laboratories.
  • Michael R. Anastasio, the former director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory and former president of Los Alamos National Security LLC, the company that operated the laboratory until 2011. He is also the former director of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
  • Kirkland H. Donald, a former commander of US naval submarine forces and NNSA deputy administrator who’s now president and chief executive of Systems Planning and Analysis (SPA). SPA holds several contracts with the NNSA.
  • Franklin C. Miller, a former special assistant to President George W. Bush who is a member of the board of directors of the Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, which also runs the Y-12 and Pantex plants.
  • Former California congresswoman Ellen O. Tauscher, who is on the board of governors for Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and Los Alamos National Security LLC, the consortia that run the corresponding national labs.
  • Former New Mexico Congresswoman Heather A. Wilson, who, according to the Energy Department inspector general, received nearly $450,000 in questionable payments, mostly from the Los Alamos and Sandia laboratories; the inspector general found that the Sandia lab paid Wilson to engage in an impermissible attempt to have the federal government extend the lab management contract held by the Sandia Corporation…….. http://thebulletin.org/rebranding-nuclear-weapons-complex-wont-reform-it7935

 

January 20, 2015 - Posted by | secrets,lies and civil liberties

1 Comment »

  1. […] Efforts to reform its dysfunctional nuclear weapons complex are just not good enough.  Conflicts of interest on Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise.   USA’s […]

    Pingback by This week: Australian nuclear and climate news « Antinuclear | January 26, 2015 | Reply


Leave a reply to This week: Australian nuclear and climate news « Antinuclear Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.