Today’s tweet attacks from pro Thorium Nuclear trolls
For your entertainment?
These tweets are in response to news items that I have tweeted about problems with thorium nuclear reactors, and the benefits of renewable energy. These pro thorium tweeters make no attempt to answer that information. Their response is to repeatedly attack me personally. But in my opinion not very intelligently. I note that they use sexist and ageist language and pictures. (The pictures are taken ftom ny own graphics, but changed so as to insult me. I wouldn’t bother about all this – but I think it is good to expose the nuclear lobby’s tactics.
Look carefully at Noel wauchope’s DISHONEST tweets “It rained today. I got wet. No to #thorium” Really?!
That the person Noel Wauchope is MURDERING with her FUD was NOT exposed to #thorium is irrelevant to this DISHONEST person!
Noel Wauchope is STUPID. Using the MOST EXPENSIVE #nuclear power plant as reference, German solar is STILL 4 times as expensive! #thorium
Noel Wauchope is not more a critic of #nuclear power than my dog. All she has to offer is IGNORANT BIGOTRY!
Be carefiul of Noel Wauchope. Kills Japanese with glee [ ??? Editors exclamation] but cries boohoo when exposed. NO TO HER DISHONESTY!
Let’s be clear: Noel Wauchope aka @ChristinaMac1 is a Fossil Fuel Industry shill. People have died because of her actions.[ again ???]
Noel Wauchope cannot read let alone understand Science. Her IGNORANT BIGOTRY is all she has. STOP the #GrannyFUD!
brendan @totterdell91 Bwhahaha Noel Wauchopes sock puppets constantly defame everyone else, then have the hide to whine #whataloaofcockycrap #thorium
4 Comments »
Leave a reply to arclight2011part2 Cancel reply
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


he/they still at it .. ?? shared .. expect yer twitter to get busy .. i hope 😉
I always welcome personal attacks when debating this topic. It’s a sure sign they are losing the argument, and I never hesitate to point that out. Just remember to keep on point, and pound those critical points home until they admit that nuclear is dangerous, expensive, and unnecessary. Remember never to fall into the false dichotomy of nuclear OR fossil fuels. There are many other alternatives that are ACTUALLY safe, renewable, and green. It’s just a matter of prioritizing. Keep up the great work!
Thank you, Brian. That is all good advice. I think that if we dug deep we would find the same PR people promoting both fossil fuels and nuclear. And with green technologies, there’s that new phenomenon of distributed energy. I think that people have not yet woken up to the revolution going on in small scale local energy, obtained and used on the spot.
I’m not sure about welcoming the personal attacks. I ponder at times, if they are evidence of mental instability in the person tweeting. In which case, it would be best to just ignore them. It is hard to believe that these unreasonable tweets are really part of a sane and planned campaign to discredit any critic of the nuclear industry
Thank you, Brian. That is all good advice. I think that if we dug deep we would find the same PR people promoting both fossil fuels and nuclear. And with green technologies, there’s that new phenomenon of distributed energy. I think that people have not yet woken up to the revolution going on in small scale local energy, obtained and used on the spot.
I’m not sure about welcoming the personal attacks. I ponder at times, if they are evidence of mental instability in the person tweeting. In which case, it would be best to just ignore them. It is hard to believe that these unreasonable tweets are really part of a sane and planned campaign to discredit any critic of the nuclear industry