Allow nuclear plants to replace thermal power plant sites: Atomic Energy Commission
According to safety norms, it is necessary to provide for ‘exclusion-radius’ which necessitates that people do not live in the radius of 1 km from the reactor, Sinha said.
28 Nov, 2013
MUMBAI: With public opposition to nuclear energy plants leading to land acquisition issues, Atomic Energy Commission chairman RK Sinha suggested that the government could allow it to use the sites earmarked for thermal plants to set up N-plants.
“Finding land for nuclear power plants is difficult today. We have lots of sites where coal-based projects are planned. There is uncertainty over coal availability or it’s becoming un-affordable and environmentally un-viable. Enough land and water are available at these sites, which can be used for setting up nuclear plants,” Sinha said at a nuclear energy summit here today.
Though this plan cannot be implemented immediately because of regulatory and safety regimes, there is a need to establish extraordinary levels of safety in new reactors to achieve this target, he added.
According to safety norms, it is necessary to provide for ‘exclusion-radius’ which necessitates that people do not live in the radius of 1 km from the reactor, Sinha said.
“We need to establish the extraordinary levels of safety in the newer reactor designs which are now being implemented to make it safe for getting exemption from such large regulatory requirements,” Sinha later told reporters.
Sinha further said that this will be demonstrated first in the advanced heavy water reactor (AHWR) which is being designed and developed at the Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC) in Tarapur near here.
“The design is complete and we will start construction in the 12th Plan subject to land availability. This will meet the requirement of the era,” he added.
The 300-mw AHWR is designed to use thorium instead of uranium for power generation.
Sinha also spoke about need for working on economies and competitiveness of nuclear power price.
“Today we cannot consider nuclear energy being costlier in locations where electricity from other sources of power is cheaper…There is a need to adopt strategy to keep the cost affordable for states and profitable for power generating firm (NPCIL),” he said.
2 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- February 2026 (20)
- January 2026 (307)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (376)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS

Have you ever thought about publishing an ebook or guest authoring on other sites?
I have a blog centered on the same subjects you discuss and
would love to have you share some stories/information.
I know my viewers would value your work. If you are even
remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e mail.
thanks, but flat out doing this website