nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

New technique could reduce volume of nuclear waste, make it safer?

http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2013/11/06/New-technique-could-reduce-volume-of-nuclear-waste-make-it-safer/UPI-79491383775638/#ixzz2juY1n2ge
Nov. 6, 2013
SHEFFIELD, England, Nov. 6 (UPI) — Researchers at a British university say the volume of nuclear waste could be reduced by 90 percent for more efficient and safer disposal.Scientist in the University of Sheffield’s Faculty of Engineering report mixing plutonium-contaminated waste with blast furnace slag and turning it into glass to reduce its volume by 85-95 percent.The technique also effectively locks in the radioactive plutonium, creating a stable, safer end product, the researchers said in a university release Wednesday.

“The overall volume of plutonium contaminated wastes from operations and decommissioning in the United Kingdom could be upwards of 31,000 cubic meters [1.09 million cubic feet], enough to fill the clock tower of Big Ben seven times over,” lead researcher Neil Hyatt said. “Our process would reduce this waste volume to fit neatly within the confines of just one Big Ben tower.”

The current disposal strategy for plutonium-contaminated wastes involves cement encapsulation, a process which typically increases the overall volume, he said.

“If we can reduce the volume of waste that eventually needs to be stored and buried underground, we can reduce the costs considerably,” Hyatt said. “At the same time, our process can stabilize the plutonium in a more corrosion resistant material, so this should improve the safety case and public acceptability of geological disposal.”

The technique could also be used to treat large volumes of mixed wastes such as those generated by the eventual cleanup of the damaged Fukushima plant in Japan, the researchers said.

[NOTE ; Arclight2011 …And heres what the downside is  https://nuclear-news.net/?s=sellafield+pollution
In a recent DECC report the corporations were not prepared to give information on the downside and details of similar processes as above. In fact the nuclear corporations said they would withdraw all co-operation with the UK government if they were pushed to answer. In the same report, they also refused to except any independent advice and oversight. Below are links to the details;]

UK, call for consensus – “Credible options paper on radiation epidemiology and radiobiology research “

07 October 2013

The NDA has today published a Credible Options Paper on Radiation Epidemiology and Radiobiology Research. The paper presents our initial assessment of the options for managing our radiation epidemiology and radiobiology research and associated research assets.

PDF Radiation Epidemiology and Radiobiology Research Credible Options October 2013 (250Kb)

To further evaluate these options and determine a Preferred Option we would like to understand the views of stakeholders on the identified options, the criteria for selecting between them and the results of our initial assessment. If you have any comments on the paper, please email your comments to strategy@nda.gov.uk by 15 November 2013.

http://www.nda.gov.uk/news/credible-options-research-2013.cfm

November 6, 2013 - Posted by | Uncategorized

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.