The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Fukushima nuclear reactor No 4 – a dangerous global worry

NYTimes: Countries increasingly worried about Fukushima Unit 4 spent fuel — Experts: Concern over potential cracks in pool walls — Professors: “In deteriorating condition”; “This is a critical global issue”; “Could have fatal consequences for Japan”
New York Times, Sept. 3, 2013: […] thousands of workers and a small fleet of cranes are preparing for one of the latest efforts to avoid a deepening environmental disaster that has China and other neighbors increasingly worried: removing spent fuel rods from the damaged No. 4 reactor building and storing them in a safer place. […]


Xinhua, Sept. 4: […] Mitsuhei Murata, a former Japanese ambassador to Switzerland has officially called for the withdrawal of Tokyo’s Olympic bid, due to the worsening crisis at Fukushima, which experts believe is not limited to storage tanks, but also potential cracks in the walls of the spent nuclear fuel pools. […]

Telegraph,Sept 4, 2013: […] Tom Snitch, a senior professor at the University of Maryland and with more than 30 years’ experience in nuclear issues, said  “[Japan officials] need to address the real problems, the spent fuel rods in Unit 4 and the leaking pressure vessels,” he said. “There has been too much work done wiping down walls and duct work in the reactors for any other reason then to do something. […] This is a critical global issue and Japan must step up.”

Japan Focus, Sept. 2, 2013: […]  from November, TEPCO plans to begin the delicate operation of removing spent fuel from Reactor No. 4 fuel pool. […] The spent-fuel pool […] was damaged by the earthquake and tsunami, and is in a deteriorating condition. It remains vulnerable to any further shocks, and is also at risk from ground liquefaction. […] If a fuel rod is dropped, breaks or becomes entangled while being removed, possible worst case scenarios include a big explosion, a meltdown in the pool, or a large fire. […] This is literally a matter of national security – another mistake by TEPCO could have incredibly costly, even fatal, consequences for Japan. […]

See also: Professor: Fukushima Unit No. 4 “an immediate problem” — Building is sinking, over 30 inches in places — Extraordinary possibility plant could be back at March 2011 if situation continues — Risk of fission accident in fuel pool (AUDIO)

September 7, 2013 - Posted by | Fukushima 2013


  1. Well the whole place should be a global worry. It’s leaking radiation & waste is being leaked into the ocean. Ofcourse by the time it got to other countries it’d be deluded some but it’s still a lot of sealife in the ocean you’re killing. On top of that people all over the globe has an increased chance to get thyroid cancer,ect. I hope they stay safe & the world doesn’t get more polluted with it but huge /golfclap to the genius that put a nuclear plant on the ocean front & in an earthquake zone. Some might say it’s an American design but you people (Tepco) are the ones that decided to build there. Tepco you’re main concern should be getting it under control,decommission it & above all else keep people safe including the employess instead of covering it up.

    Comment by Jan May Smith | September 8, 2013 | Reply

  2. BTW I keep my fingers crossed for the poor Japanese people that have to endure this ongoing disaster after going through so much 2 years ago.

    Comment by Jan May Smith | September 8, 2013 | Reply

  3. ☢ Fukushima Petitions to Sign & Share! ☢
    ☢ Japan Needs Worldwide Help NOW! ☢

    ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢ ☢

    Comment by SusanS | September 8, 2013 | Reply

  4. […] Fukushima nuclear reactor No 4 – a dangerous global worry ( […]

    Pingback by Fukushima disaster update | Dear Kitty. Some blog | September 9, 2013 | Reply

  5. […] Fukushima nuclear reactor No 4 – a dangerous global worry ( […]

    Pingback by Fukushima, unit 4, fuel removal, 9/13/13 | Vernon Radiation Safety | September 13, 2013 | Reply

  6. […] Or des poutrelles d’acier étant tombées dans cette piscine, endommageant des assemblages de combustibles nucléaires, la tâche s’annonce périlleuse : si une barre de combustible tombe, se casse, le pire des scénarios est possible : explosion, effondrement de la piscine… lien […]

    Pingback by Le casse-tête du démantèlement nucléaire | Les 7 du Québec | September 29, 2013 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: