After Chernobyl, complexity surrounds local health problems – CNN International
…For Jennifer Henning, president of Hope for Chernobyl’s Child, there’s no question that the ailments the children in the program suffer are the result of radiation exposure….
18 August 2013
http://us.cnn.com/2013/08/18/health/helping-chernobyl-children/index.html?hpt=hp_c3
(CNN) — Yulia Gorelik describes her 8-year-old son Daniel as “a very clever boy.” He plays “Fur Elise” with elegant ease on the piano and enjoys eating McDonald’s chicken nuggets.
Mother and son arrived in the United States earlier this summer through an organization called Hope for Chernobyl’s Child. Gorelik had faith that American doctors could fix Daniel’s headaches, weakness and vertigo during their six-week stay.
“I have the hope that we can do something here to make him stronger, because he is intelligent, he is nice, but his body is weak,” Gorelik, 34, told CNN in July.
The Goreliks live in a region called Gomel, Belarus, which was heavily hit with radioactive fallout from the worst nuclear accident the world has ever seen.
On April 26, 1986, explosions at a reactor at Chernobyl in Ukraine produced radiation effects almost 14 times greater than the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi disaster in Japan, and 400 times more powerful than the 1945 atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
More than 2 million people in Belarus were affected by the Chernobyl disaster, according to the World Bank. Two-thirds of the contamination from the accident fell in Belarus, diminishing the quality of life in the region.
Hope for Chernobyl’s Child helps 10 to 15 children living in Belarus find host families and dental and medical care in Washington state every summer. The organization also helps families on the ground in Belarus by delivering humanitarian aid.
Medical and dental care are lacking in areas affected by the disaster, Hope for Chernobyl’s Child says. Families there often earn little money and have limited job opportunities, making it difficult to provide food, clothing and medications for their children.
Ask Gorelik whether her son’s health problems are caused by radiation, and she says, “Yes, of course.”
But the reality is much more complex.
Chernobyl tourists see relics among the radiation
What does radiation really cause?
People who lived in the areas that received significant contamination from Chernobyl in 1986 have been the subject of many scientific studies. But researchers haven’t looked much at health problems in the region’s children who weren’t yet born at the time of the disaster, said Scott Davis, epidemiologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center at the University of Washington.
The lack of hard evidence doesn’t mean that lingering radiation isn’t causing harm in some ways, Davis said, but it would be difficult to establish that anyone’s particular disease or condition stems from low-dose radiation exposure over a long period in that area.
“This is a major problem in talking with people who, either themselves or someone close to them, (are) sick, ” he said. “To say, ‘Well, we don’t see any risk’ — people just can’t get their head around that.”
The issue is complicated because cancer, for example, caused by radiation looks exactly like cancer that developed for other reasons, experts say. There’s no “Chernobyl” name tag on tumors in people who suffered radiation exposure.
Scientists know radioactive iodine-131 got into the human body when people drank milk from cows that ate contaminated grass, said Dr. Fred Mettler, professor emeritus of the Department of Radiology at the University of New Mexico. This led to higher incidences of thyroid cancer in people who were children at that time — such as Yulia Gorelik, who underwent treatment at age 12.
More than 4,000 such cases were diagnosed from 1992 to 2002, but it’s impossible to say which ones were caused by Chernobyl radiation. Mettler said the iodine is unlikely to have caused cancer in anyone born later — especially because iodine-131 has a half-life of eight days, so in about two months it’s almost undetectable.
Another radioactive chemical from the reactor explosion, Cesium-137, has a half-life of about 30 years, so it stays around a lot longer than iodine-131, and can still be measured in some soils and foods in several areas of Europe. Still the dose to which people in the area have been exposed isn’t very high, Mettler said.
After Chernobyl, complexity surrounds local health problems – CNN International
West German Customs officials closely screen goods, cars and people coming in from Eastern Europe on May 5, 1986. Radioactivity from the Chernobyl nuclear plant threatened to contaminate crops. 
Twenty-seven years after the nuclear disaster, engineers work on April 26, 2013, to construct a colossal arch-shaped structure to permanently cover the exploded reactor.- More than 2 million people in Belarus were affected by the Chernobyl disaster
- About 5 million people in Belarus, Ukraine and Russia received whole-body radiation
- Several groups provide relief to kids who live in areas that received radioactive fallout
- It is not possible to say that any particular illness was caused by Chernobyl radiation
The Uranium Mining industry in Australia is set to rebound after a troubled five years … Delusion or no?
...Sometimes the things going on in one’s head are confusing and overwhelming. Delusions can make it hard to know what to believe and what not to....
Image source ; http://tanyajpeterson.com/the-delusions-of-schizophrenia/
Melbourne, Australia (PRWEB) August 19, 2013
…China and India, together with other countries such as South Korea, are expected to continue their nuclear energy programs, boosting both the demand for nuclear energy and the price of uranium. Higher uranium output and prices are expected to underpin industry growth…
Australia has an estimated 46.0% of the world’s low-cost uranium reserves and accounts for 15.0% to 20.0% of global uranium output. Over the five years through 2013-14, the Uranium Mining industry in Australia is forecast to decline at annual compound rate of 2.2% to reach $992.0 million. According to IBISWorld industry analyst Andrei Ivanov, “in 2013-14, industry revenue is forecast to grow by 8.7% on the back of increased production”.
Radon man revisted – Project 2 – Wheres the radon gone? or Looking for an honest UNSCEAR
I am pleased to announce the return of the adventures of Radon Man. After having my arse smacked by the powers that be in London (was it something I said??? 🙂 , I am back to investigate the so-called hot spots of radon recently espoused by UNSCEAR, I will investigate the European radon map.. I will be starting with the UK.
I am located at the south western hotspot hovering in Dartmoor for now and will be tracking the rads (if I find any)
Uploaded on 18 Aug 2013
< class=”yt” style=”text-align: center;”>
Chernobyl’s legacy recorded In trees to alter nuclear “debate”
Published on 18 Aug 2013
Exposure to radiation from the 1986 Chernobyl accident had a lasting negative legacy on the area’s trees, a study has suggested.
Researchers said the worst effects were recorded in the “first few years” but surviving trees were left vulnerable to environmental stress, such as drought.
They added that young trees appeared to be particularly affected.
Writing in the journal Trees, the team said it was the first study to look at the impact at a landscape scale.
“Our field results were consistent with previous findings that were based on much smaller sample sizes,” explained co-author Tim Mousseau from the University of South Carolina, US.
“They are also consistent with the many reports of genetic impacts to these trees,” he told BBC News.
“Many of the trees show highly abnormal growth forms reflecting the effects of mutations and cell death resulting from radiation exposure.”
Prof Mousseau, who has been carrying out field studies since 1999 within the 30km (19-mile) exclusion zone around the site of the 1986 explosion, said it was the first time that a study of this scale – involving more than 100 Scots pines (Pinus sylvestris) at 12 sites – had been conducted.
“There was one similar study conducted before but it only looked at a total of nine trees and was mainly interested in wood structure, not growth,” he said.
“Another study was performed in the 1950s but it was for a different tree in the US and it used a single external gamma source suspended above the ground to show growth effects for a very limited number of trees.”
BBC science reporter Victoria Gill in 2011 joined a team of scientists studying wildlife in the Chernobyl exclusion zone
For this study, the team took core samples from Scots pine trees for a number of reasons, such as the species is found across Europe and well dispersed within the Chernobyl region.
“They are also a favourite for silviculture and have enormous economic value,” Prof Mousseau added.
Collage of photos showing mutated Scots pines (Image: Tim Mousseau)
The twisted stems of Scots pines have been attributed to mutations caused by radiation exposure
“Also, based on past work and our own observations, they appeared to be a good target for radioecology as they showed signs of being impacted by the fallout.
“In fact, one of the first ecological observations at Chernobyl was the death of the so-called red forest: a stand of these pines which very quickly died and turned red following the disaster.”
Scots pines’ tree rings were also easier to read than other species, such as birch, found in the study area, he explained.
Prof Mousseau and his team hope to follow up this study by carrying out similar work in the Fukushima region in Japan, where logging also had considerable economic importance and pine trees were widely dispersed.
“Based on our limited field observations in the most contaminated regions of Fukushima prefecture, there did not appear to be a major die off as seen in Chernobyl for Scots pines,” he said.
“However, anecdotally, we have noticed significant die off of growing tips and branches in some areas that suggests that there could be impacts on growth.
“This is worth further investigation.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-env…
All material provided on this channel is for educational purposes only. No copyright infringement intended.
Other Fukushima rights activist bloggers..
Andrew Ebisu http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSCiZ…<<(Win A gold bar from Ebisu studios)
NibiruMajick2012 http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCguov…
HatrickPenry http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2u90…
chevyken http://www.youtube.com/user/chevyken?…
The Australian free ride on US defence must stop! Snouts in the trough!
…..Mr Armitage described Collins as a “disaster” and emphatically disagrees with local experts who say the US would never make this platform available to Australia.
“I certainly think the US government would agree to provide Australia with the Virginia-class technology, which would be very much in the US Navy’s interests,” he said.
Mr Armitage noted that agreements struck between the Howard and Bush governments in the 2000s on intelligence and technology sharing meant that Australia was “eligible for the highest level of military-grade technology exports”……
Image source; http://blog.booktopia.com.au/2010/09/11/andrew-fraser-author-of-snouts-in-the-trough-answers-ten-terrifying-questions/
Christopher Joye
18 August 2013
Former United States deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage has criticised Australia for appeasing China in a toned-down Defence white paper and warned Australia can’t continue “free riding” off its alliance with the US.
The comments will fuel the debate over defence spending and national security, which so far has been ignored in the election campaign.
Mr Armitage told The Australian Financial Review he had read the latest 2013 Defence white paper “in its entirety” and was unimpressed Australia had “chosen to trim her sails simply because China was grumpy after the publication of the 2009 defence white paper”.
“The Chinese said Australia would ‘suffer consequences’ in 2009 and the language in 2013 is certainly toned down,’’ he said.
Mr Armitage said Australia’s national security approach seemed to rely on the US maximising co-operation with China and minimising competition, and assumed the US would always be there to defend Australia.
He said that “one of the many things America’s rebalancing in the Indo-Pacific is not an opportunity for countries to free ride off US taxpayers.
“I think that people who automatically expect the US to be there to defend Australia and want to free ride but are not willing to sacrifice appropriately are being totally unfair and selfish.”
In a wide-ranging interview, Mr Armitage said China’s government could struggle for legitimacy in a lower growth environment, criticised America’s “rebalancing” back into Asia as “hurried, inarticulate and having raised more questions than it answered”, maintained America would be willing to offer Australia sensitive nuclear-powered submarines to replace the beleaguered Collins-class boats, which were a “disaster”, slammed President Barrack Obama for not “bearding” Russia for giving the fugitive leaker, Edward Snowden, asylum, and revealed his main fears are the impact of cyber warfare and nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan.
“At a time when we are having our own budget difficulties but still spending north of 4 per cent of our very considerable GDP on defence, it is only just to expect more from our partners,” he said, “particularly a partner like Australia, who has had over 20 straight years of pretty spectacular economic growth.”
Mark Thomson, an Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior analyst, said Mr Armitage was “one of the most astute observers of Australian defence policy” and has “seen right through the sophistry of the 2013 defence white paper and called it for what it is”.
The Lowy Institute’s Rory Medcalf said Mr Armitage was a “friend of the alliance” who was “right in pointing out that Australian governments are being too clever by half when it comes to cutting defence spending at a time of growing strategic tension in the Indo-Pacific”.
More equitable costs
Mr Armitage served in numerous senior diplomatic and Defence roles under presidents Ronald Reagan, George Bush and George W Bush, including deputy secretary of state and assistant secretary of defence for international security affairs.
He said there needed to be a more equitable distribution of defence costs across alliance members, and warned if Asian tensions escalated, the spotlight would turn to the large gap between Australian and American defence spending per capita.
“If there was any future neuralgia in the Indo-Pacific, then the US would start looking at Australia and ask, “What’s up with that – you’re spending 1.56 per cent of GDP? You expect America to be there for you on defence, but you have to be there for yourself as well.”
The opposition spokesman on defence, David Johnston, said “Labor has treated the defence portfolio like an ATM, taking $25 billion out through deferments, cuts, delays and cancellations” to fill its fiscal holes.
“The 2013-14 budget will reduce the share of GDP being spent on defence to just 1.49 per cent, the lowest since 1938,” he said.
Dr Thomson said Mr Armitage was “absolutely correct that Australia is ‘free riding’ on US security efforts in Asia – but we’ve been doing so since the end of the Second World War”.
He noted that other US allies did the same and said that for a middle power like Australia, “the logic of free riding is compelling”.
This was because without changes in Australia’s position on major military investments, “nothing we can do is likely to make an enduring difference to the overall balance of power in Asia”.
Dr Thomson said this situation would “change completely” if the US decided to “play a less active role in the region” and that this was a “risk we need to keep an eye on”.
Major-General Jim Molan, who led Australia’s contribution to the Iraq war, vehemently disagrees.
He said free riding off the US alliance was “a very dangerous strategy” as increasingly isolationist US policies implied “the US may not want or, given its parlous economy, be able to come to the aid of even deserving allies”.
The need to acquire our own strategic weight
While both political parties agree Australia should be spending 2 per cent of GDP on defence in the long run, the nation is currently committing one-quarter less than this amount.
“Despite the wishes of the strategically blind, it is not possible to effectively provide for the defence of Australia with just 1.5 per cent of GDP,” Major-General Molan said.
“That we provide inadequately is not alarmist, it is not a myth – it is a fact recognised by both political parties, but yet to impact on the Australian consciousness.”
The Lowy Institute’s Mr Medcalf said Mr Armitage’s remarks were a “warning about the future health of the alliance – relying on America is no substitute for acquiring our own credible strategic weight”.
Mr Armitage told the Financial Review regional military conflicts in Asia over the next 15 to 30 years were “quite likely”. “History suggests there are very few times where you can go for even a decade without outbreaks of major violence in a region,” he said. “And I think that is a very real possibility given the historic animosities in Asia.”
Although Mr Armitage does not think “we have to return to the traumas that existed during the Cold War”, he avers “we could find ourselves back in that situation” given that dislocations inevitably emerge when incumbent major powers have to accommodate rivals.
700 experts for Abu Dhabi nuke energy summit in a vain bid to revive nuclear
Abu Dhabi, 4 days ago
Up to 700 nuclear experts from around the world will discuss the development of peaceful nuclear energy at an upcoming conference in Abu Dhabi.
The New Nuclear International Conference, which will run at the Ritz Carlton Abu Dhabi, Grand Canal from November 11-14, is being presented by the Goodnight Consulting Corporation >>>>>(list of personnel experience including Sellafield consultancy work) <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 🙂 and organised by Carlisle Events.
In partnership with the Emirates Nuclear Energy, the conference will bring international experts to provide delegates with key know-how in the initiation, design and launch of peaceful nuclear energy programmes.
The conference has the backing of the World Organization of Nuclear Operators, the World Nuclear Association, Arab Atomic Energy Association and the US-UAE Business Council.
The conference comes to Abu Dhabi with the support of Abu Dhabi Convention Bureau -the single source business events catalyst of Abu Dhabi Tourism & Culture Authority (TCA Abu Dhabi).
“The contact emerged from our inaugural MICE roadshow staged in the USA earlier this year and we have been able to support it via our Advantage Abu Dhabi meetings incentive program,” said Jassem Al Darmaki, deputy director general, TCA Abu Dhabi.
“Major conferences such as this are central to our campaign to be listed, by the International Conventions and Congresses Association (ICCA), among the Top 50 associations’ meetings destinations within the next five years.” – TradeArabia News Service
Wiki-censored French nuclear test information
This article is missing information about individual French nuclear tests, despite the fact that French nuclear testing redirects here. (December 2012)
WHAT YOU ARE ALLOWED TO SEE>>>
The Force de Frappe (French: strike force), or Force de dissuasion after 1961[1] , is the designation of what used to be a triad of air-, sea- and land-based nuclear weapons intended for dissuasion, the French term for deterrence. The French Nuclear Force, part of the Armed Forces of France, is the third largest nuclear-weapons force in the world, following the nuclear triads of the Russian Federation and the United States.
France deactivated all landbased nuclear missiles. On 27 January 1996, France conducted its last nuclear test (in the South Pacific) before signing the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) in September 1996. In March 2008, President Nicolas Sarkozy of France confirmed reports giving the actual size of France’s nuclear arsenal and he announced that France will reduce its French Air Force-carried nuclear arsenal by 30%, leaving the Force de Frappe with 250 warheads.[2]
Atomic kitchen: French research center stores plutonium in pressure cookers
(Brilliant RT artwork from V. K|remler 🙂 )
Published time: August 18, 2013
A French nuclear research center has been using ordinary pressure cookers to store and transport plutonium and other “sensitive materials” for 50 years, it has been revealed. The news leaked as the center posted a public tender for 4,000 pressure cookers.
“We are seeking 4,000 stainless steel pressure cookers with a volume of approximately 17 liters,” the tender read, in an announcement more akin to a restaurant chain looking to upgrade its casseroles than a nuclear facility.
The center insists that pressure cookers have been safely holding atomic material for the last five decades, pointing to their secure fastenings that ensure contents don’t escape – even if dropped from a considerable height.
Conveniently, pressure cookers are also cheaper than specialized containers.
“The pressure cooker… provides the best value for money,” Bugaut François, the head of the research center in Valduc, told ‘France Info’ radio. “This is perfectly normal, we’ve done this for decades.”
And the practice is even more widespread, it seems.
A representative of French household goods manufacturer SEB claims to have sold thousands of pressure cookers to the country’s nuclear industry.
Bugaut says the pressure cookers are actually well designed to carry substances such as plutonium.
“They’re conditioned to avoid radiation and retain dust,” Bugaut said. “Simply, we need a metal container, light and easy to carry.” He also revealed that his center used hermetic pressure cookers for such purposes practically since the center was founded over 50 years ago.
The research official insisted that pressure cookers were not “stuffed” with nuclear materials to the hilt, because storage technology implies that small packages of radioactive materials are interlaid with substances blocking radiation, such as lead. The director also insisted that cookers with radioactive materials inside would not leave the Valduc plant.
The Valduc nuclear center in the Burgundy town of Is-sur-Tille belongs to France’s state-funded Atomic Energy Commission. Valduc is known as France’s primary center for military nuclear research. All French nuclear warheads are produced, maintained and dismantled there.
Founded in 1958, Valduc today employs about 1,000 CEA employees and 300 contractors.
With plutonium density of 19.84 cc, a 17-liter pressure cooker can held over 330 kilograms of radioactive metal. It is hard to imagine that anyone would pour liquid plutonium into a pressure cooker, but such a cooker filled with nuclear waste would be quite heavy, making transportation problematical.
http://rt.com/news/pressure-cooker-plutonium-france-628/
Guessing game as Pakistan’s powerful army chief prepares to retire
Story Dated: Sunday, August 18, 2013
Gulfmanorama
Islamabad: In a nation long plagued by military coups, the question of who will replace Pakistan’s all-powerful army chief has taken on new urgency this year as the country tries to shake off the legacy of decades of military dictatorship.
General Ashfaq Kayani, arguably the most powerful man in the nuclear-armed country, is expected to step down after six years in November – presenting Pakistan’s new premier with the toughest of choices yet since coming to power in May.
The army has ruled Pakistan for more than half of its history since independence in 1947. But even during periods of civilian rule, the army has set security and foreign policy.
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif says he wants to disentangle the military from politics and he has taken over the foreign affairs and defence portfolios in an apparent show of determination to wrest those responsibilities from the army.
But the military is unlikely to relinquish its hold at such a sensitive time. As Western forces prepare to withdraw from Afghanistan by the end of next year, Pakistan is striving to prevent old rival India from increasing its influence there.
Illustrating the difficulties Sharif might face in setting foreign policy, his bid to improve ties with India has been undermined by violence between Indian and Pakistani forces in the disputed Kashmir region. While the two armies trade fire and blame, Pakistan’s civilian government can only look on.
Crews struggle to restore former nuke lab site in Calif.
Deadline to remove toxic mess is 2017, which some say is too ambitious
Even if the bulk of contaminated soil is scooped up and hauled away, the groundwater problem persists. The state estimates it would take many decades to complete that part of the cleanup.
For residents like Huff, who was diagnosed with leukemia in 2009, the cleanup has dragged so long that she hopes there’s no more dramas
“To be honest, sometimes I try not to think about it,” she said. “It’s just depressing.”
August 17. 2013 11:54PM
ALICIA CHANG AP Science Writer
SIMI VALLEY, Calif. — The sun was barely up at a former Cold War rocket test site when crews in hard hats, neon vests and steel-toe boots collected jars of dirt as part of a massive effort to clean up from a partial nuclear meltdown a half century ago.
Parties that inherited the toxic mess face a 2017 deadline to restore the sprawling hilltop complex on the outskirts of Los Angeles to its condition before chemical and radioactive wastes leached into the soil and groundwater.
For residents living downhill from the Santa Susana Field Laboratory, it would seem like a conclusion to a protracted fight. But many remain dissatisfied that a large portion of the land won’t be cleaned to the highest standards.
“I don’t care how long it takes, I just want it cleaned,” said 62-year-old Holly Huff, whose family moved into the area a month before the 1959 nuclear accident.
The road to decontamination has been long and costly, as winding as the two-lane path to the lab entrance 30 miles northwest of downtown LA. Decades in the works, the cleanup has been complicated by the web of owners and responsible parties at the nearly 2,900-acre site.
Environmentalists and homeowners three years ago cheered when the U.S. Energy Department and NASA agreed to clean their parcels to background levels — the most stringent standard — essentially returning the land to its natural state.
Japan looks to Nagasaki atom bomb maker for lessons on Fukushima cleanup
Published time: August 17, 2013
RT
Four reactor building of the crippled TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture (AFP Photo)
Tokyo Electric Power Co., the operator dealing with the containment of radioactive waste at Fukushima nuclear power plant, has sought the expertise of the same US company that produced plutonium for the atom bomb dropped on Nagasaki in World War II.
Follow RT’s LIVE UPDATES on the Fukushima leak emergency
Hanford Engineer Works produced the 20 pounds of plutonium used for the atomic bomb “Fat Man” which was unleashed on the Japanese city of Nagasaki on August 9, 1945. The company has had decades of experience treating millions of gallons of radioactive waste, The Japan Daily Press reported.
In the two years following the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami which led to several meltdowns at the Fukushima Daichii nuclear power plant, Tokyo Nuclear Power Co. (TEPCO) has struggled to deal with the waste water produced by the decommissioning of the molten-down reactors.
Now, TEPCO has dispatched its engineers to Hanford – located in the US state of Washington – to try to learn from the company’s operations. The business oversees a 586 square mile nuclear waste facility located 200 miles southeast of Seattle.
At Hanford’s site, engineers are working to decommission nine nuclear reactors that were in operation from 1944 to 1987, carrying out weapons production. Its laboratories and plutonium facilities were integral to the Manhattan Project, which produced the first atomic bomb for the US.
“The United States has vast experience in nuclear technology with their military activity, including decontaminating soil and managing river contamination,” said Masumi Ishikawa, general manager of TEPCO’s radioactive waste management, to The Japanese Daily Press. “There’s a lot we can learn from them.”
Hanford has indeed had to deal with a sizeable amount of nuclear waste, as the Washington site generated 56 million gallons – enough to fill an American football field.
TEPCO is now working on a deal with both Hanford and the Department of Energy to assist in the decommissioning process at Fukushima, which Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe admitted last week was beyond TEPCO’s ability to deal with alone.
“We identified seven areas of US expertise that can be tapped,” said Ishikawa. “That includes decommissioning, nuclear waste disposal, removal of melted fuel, and restoration of surrounding areas.”
Japan’s venturing abroad for help in dealing with the Fukushima nuclear disaster seems to underscore the increasingly dire situation at the site. Earlier in August, the country’s nuclear watchdog – the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) – called the radioactive water leakage at the site an “emergency.” Continue reading
Radioactive politics: A court rightly tells Obama to move on Yucca
August 18, 2013 12:12 am
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The Obama administration talks a good game on global warming and the use of nuclear energy, which has the advantage of not producing greenhouse gases. But when it comes to providing the nuclear industry with a site for storing nuclear waste, the administration’s policy is to do nothing — and never mind what the law says.
Last Tuesday, a federal court served notice that doing nothing on the Yucca Mountain repository site in Nevada has to stop. In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ordered the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to make up its mind on the licensing application for developing Yucca Mountain. The commission, the court said, “continued to violate the law” by not deciding.
Yucca Mountain was settled on years ago as the sole candidate for a nuclear repository site and the Bush administration submitted the licensing application in June 2008. Under the terms of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had three years to make up its mind.
The merits of the site need to be officially weighed, but radioactive politics has become a much greater problem than the technical arguments.
1 This Month.
5 January -Webinar-What is Trump’s Golden Dome?
REGISTER AT Massachusetts Peace Action Education
New book – https://www.amazon.com/dp/1923372157?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Now until to February 10, 2026 Radioactive waste storage in France: the debate is finally open! How to participate?
-
Archives
- December 2025 (293)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
nuclear-news 