Japan’s nuclear lobby trying to keep nuclear power off the election topics
Japanese Professor: All the nuclear interests want to do is avoid making nuclear power a central election issue — Gundersen: Gov’t trying to frighten public http://enenews.com/japanese-professor-all-the-nuclear-interests-want-to-do-is-avoid-making-nuclear-power-a-central-election-issue-gundersen-govt-trying-to-frighten-public
September 6th, 2012
By ENENews Title: Japan stresses cost of ending nuclear power as decision loomsSource: REUTERSAuthors: Linda Sieg and Aaron Sheldrick; Additional reporting by Risa Maeda, Kentao Hamada and Tetsushi Kajimoto; Editing by Robert Birsel
…..a forecast [by Japan’s government said] that household energy bills would by 2030 rise by nearly double 2010 levels if Japan abandoned nuclear power.
But that has been disputed.
[…]
Predictions that power bills would double fail to take into account people’s efforts to cut energy use, other experts said.
[…]
Some experts said those figures were not only too high but also underestimated the positive economic impact of investment in renewable energy and conservation.
[…]
Given the deep divisions on the issue, political parties are eager to defuse it, most likely with vague promises, analysts said.
[…]
Arnie Gunderson, a veteran U.S. nuclear engineer and director of Fairewinds Energy Education Corp
- “It is wrong and clearly designed to frighten the population to continue using nuclear power plants”
- “What will dramatically increase electric bills is the true cost to clean up after the (Fukushima) Daiichi disaster”
Hiroshi Komiyama, chairman of Mitsubishi Research Institute
- “Our estimate is that households will use 60 to 70 percent less electricity by 2030″
- “Our calculation is that households would pay less than half of the current payments by 2030″
Renewable energy guru Tetsunari Iida, head of the Institute for Sustainable Energy Policies
- “[Gov’t claims are] very reasonable because it assumes quite expensive renewable costs”
- “Also, such investment would stimulate the economy, but they are assuming that it is a burden”
Koichi Nakano, a professor at Sophia University
- “Vested interests, on the one hand, and the more unorganised public opinion are going in different directions”
- “All they want to do is … avoid making it a central issue of the election”
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- January 2026 (118)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment