Dangerous MOX nuclear plant planned, close to highly populated area
About 35,000 people live within 10 miles of the plant. That’s no place for TVA and DOE to be running an experiment with radioactive material in an aging nuclear plant under increased supervision because of major safety problems.
Alabama.com OUR VIEW: Next door, nuclear research, September 09, 2012, By Mike Hollis, The Huntsville Times The Tennessee Valley Authority says it’s willing to consider using a blend of uranium and weapons-grade plutonium as reactor fuel at its Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant near Athens. That’s surprising, given the plant’s safety record.
Part of the problem, critics say, is that this mix of uranium and plutonium oxide fuel, called MOX, makes reactors harder to control, may increase the risk of some types of accidents and raises the threat to public health if an accident results in a major radioactive release.
The U.S. Department of Energy is proposing use of the fuel blend to
meet the terms of an agreement between the U.S. and Russia to reduce
their nuclear warhead stockpiles.
The public will get a chance to comment on the idea in a meeting that
will begin at 5:30 p.m. Thursday at the Aerospace Center at Calhoun
Community College in Decatur…..
The fuel blend might indeed produce savings because taxpayers will
pick up a lot of the cost of making it at a plant under construction
at the DOE’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina.
So far, TVA hasn’t said just how much this might save its customers,
and it’s too early for even an educated guess. TVA and DOE have not
negotiated a price for the fuel. But cheaper fuel shouldn’t be a
consideration until after safety questions at Browns Ferry are
resolved.
And the NRC has found Browns Ferry’s safety seriously lacking……
This would be the first time MOX made from weapons-grade plutonium
has been used in a boiling water reactor like the three at Browns
Ferry, which have been licensed for more than 35 years.
Another point is that there are no circumstances requiring TVA to use
this fuel in the first place.
About 35,000 people live within 10 miles of the plant. That’s no place for TVA and DOE to be running an experiment with radioactive material in an aging nuclear plant under increased supervision because of major safety problems.
http://blog.al.com/times-views/2012/09/our_view_next_door_nuclear_res.html
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- January 2026 (118)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS




Leave a comment