TEPCO’s lie about “Hydrogen” Explosion at Fukushima no 4. No Hydrogen available at Unit #4.
Can anyone explain what really happened at Fukushima reactor number 4?
http://nuclearhistory.wordpress.com/2012/08/11/can-anyone-explain-what-really-happened-at-fukushima-reactor-number-4/ Australian experts are useless, they stated in March after each explosion, that the situation was absolutely normal” (ANU nuker voice over of the brown “hydrogen” demolitions of the buildings)
Here’s a video which was shown once in Japan and then only broadcast again in India, showing the discrete reactor 4 blast: Kitagawa Takashi Keio University
“Totally a Myth. Explosion of Unit #4.
TEPCO explains it’s “Hydrogen” Explosion.
No Hydrogen available at Unit #4.
TEPCO explains it came from Unit #3 via duct.
These are lies as are pointed out for number of reasons.
TEPCO admitts there are 8m large holes north and east walls which have
never happened to Units #1,2,3.
No video available for the explosion Unit #4 in Japan, US, EU nowhere
in advanced coutries. There certainly is, TV Fukushima shot that and
withdrawed and never has been opend since then.
Only available is from India (presumablly).
2 Comments »
Leave a reply to amateur.questioner@gmail.com Cancel reply
-
Archives
- December 2025 (286)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


It is not that they are useless, it is that if they told you that you have already gotten enuff readition from japan to kill you then what would you do? would you go to work? buy a home? They (the goverments) dont want to cause a panic so they are saying everything is ok…But rember when they said and proved Cell Phone readition was bad for you? or too many X-rays were Bad for you? and there is no fule in either of them… Now when 4 reacotrs have a low level exploshion thats ok??? you figure it out because the (goverment any Goverment is NOT going to tell you) You may not die, But think what is going to happen to the kids….and it is going to get worse…and worse….and worse
Teleconference video of TEPCO shows that
TEPCO fabricated lie to announce the cause of reactor 3 explosion.
http://linktonews.digi2.jp
The video shows that
the announcement “Only Hydrogen explosion” is fabricated lie.
It means
the announcement
“All spent fuel units (including Plutonium) still remain in the pool.
No spent fuel units exploded.
No Plutonium dispersed.”
is fabricated lie, too.
But few Japanese people notice that it means so.
Japanese people got to know that
the announcement “Only Hydrogen explosion” is fabricated lie,
but nevertheless almost all Japanese people are unconcerned about Plutonium yet.
In Japan,
nobody require TEPCO show that
all spent fuel units remain in the pool of reactor 3.
Everybody around the world,
please require TEPCO show that
all spent fuel units remain in the pool of reactor 3.
Appendix:
===== Extracts (from Teleconference video) =====
> A senior TEPCO official:
“In short, the only change we have made was replacing No.1 reactor with the No.3 reactor?
We do not know whether it was a hydrogen explosion,
but since the government is saying it is a hydrogen explosion,
we can just say so, can’t we?”
> Unidentified Person:
“The prime minister’s office has also been using the term hydrogen explosion.
Perhaps we should do the same.”
> TEPCO President:
“All right. I agree. This is fine. Speediness is the key.”
> TEPCO Spokesman:
“It was a hydrogen explosion.”