Britain’s disastrous record in technology to manage nuclear waste
Minister admits total failure of Sellafield ‘MOX’ plant http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/minister-admits-total-failure-of-sellafield-mox-plant-793489.html BY GEOFFREY LEAN It was a deeply embarrassing moment for the Government, though it passed almost without notice.
Late last month, the Energy Minister, Malcolm Wicks, had to admit to one of the most comprehensive and catastrophic failures in British industrial history – and one that has led directly to the plans to ship weapons-ready plutonium to France.
Answering a question from Dai Davies, the independent MP for Blaenau Gwent, Mr Wicks confessed that a new plant at Sellafield, built amid great controversy at a cost of £473m, had comprehensively failed to work. Originally designed to produce 120 tons a year of “mixed oxide” (MOX) nuclear fuel – made of plutonium and uranium separated from nuclear waste by reprocessing – it had in fact managed only 5.3 tons in five years of operation.
The admission constituted a wholescale vindication for critics,
including The Independent on Sunday, who have long denounced the plant
as a waste of money based on unproven technology, which could also
pose a terrorist risk.
After the assault on the World Trade Center in September 2001, which
came just before the plant was given approval to start operations, the
then environment minister, Michael Meacher, asked for information on
the opportunities it afforded terrorists after reading an article in
The Independent on Sunday. But only a cursory review was carried out
by the Office for Civilian Nuclear Security, which denied any threat
in terms identical to those used by British Nuclear Fuels.
2 Comments »
Leave a reply to Christina MacPherson Cancel reply
-
Archives
- December 2025 (277)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



hi christine
just a quick note to say that this article is dated
SUNDAY 09 MARCH 2008
though it still stands.. any news on waste and decommissioning strategies? i heard sellafield is stopping the glasification process.. also the euro deal to bury nuclear waste starts in 2016 and i think the nuke companies especially edf imo, are burning ..
weve had alot of air contamination in london this past year..
i have an inspector alert, medcom version, and have tested a large brown goblet fungi (mushshroom) and the gieger registers “above normal”.. know of anyone with access to a spectrometer? they have stopped monitoring in scotland from march (just before likely bio accumulation from the years euro radiation emmissions.. 😦 )
anyway enough of my rantings..
thanks for all your hard work.. it is recognised..
peace
sean
The UK govt seem sto be going chicken on their plan to bury the wastes in Cumbria – some strong Cumbrian opposition to that idea.
Now they’re considering GE Hitachi’s new gee whiz thing – PRISM – yet another dream of how to make money out of the wastes.