Florida consumers being hit with costs for imaginary nuclear power plants
consumers are getting hit with costs for “imaginary nuclear plants” and that the Public Service Commission is not properly carrying out a 2006 law.”It’s a scam,’’ ….. “It’s an absolute scam of monumental proportions.’’
attorneys for the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, consumers and major power users questioned whether the utilities will ever build the multibillion-dollar nuclear plants.

Clean energy group to challenge PSC decision on nuke funding, Miami Herald, By Jim Saunders, 29 Dec 11 An advocacy grouup notified the state Public Service Commission that it is taking the unusual step of appealing an order that allows utilities to collect money for work on future or existing nuclear plants. By Jim Saunders The News Service of Florida TALLAHASSEE —
An advocacy group will ask the state Supreme Court to reject a regulatory decision that would allow Florida Power & Light and Progress Energy Florida to collect about $282 million from
customers next year for nuclear-power projects.The Southern Alliance for Clean Energy notified the state Public Service Commission last week that it is taking the unusual step of appealing an order that allows the utilities to collect money for work on future or existing
nuclear plants.
The dispute centers on FPL and Progress billing
customers for upfront costs on four planned nuclear reactors that
would not start producing electricity for at least another decade —
and, critics say, might never produce electricity. Stephen A. Smith,
executive director of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, said
consumers are getting hit with costs for “imaginary nuclear plants”
and that the Public Service Commission is not properly carrying out a
2006 law.”It’s a scam,’’ Smith said Tuesday. “It’s an absolute scam of
monumental proportions.’’
The 2006 law, which was designed to encourage development of more
nuclear power, has long been controversial because it allows utilities
to collect money far in advance of plants being completed. FPL has
proposed building two nuclear reactors at its Turkey Point complex in
Miami-Dade County, while Progress plans to build two reactors in Levy
County…..
During this fall’s hearings, attorneys for the Southern Alliance for
Clean Energy, consumers and major power users questioned whether the
utilities will ever build the multibillion-dollar nuclear plants.Smith
said a key issue in the appeal will center on whether the utilities
want to collect the money next year to maintain the “option” of
building the nuclear reactors.He said the Public Service Commission
didn’t properly apply the 2006 law and that utilities should be
required to show they intend to build the plants. He said the
commission “appears to be making up the rules as they go on how to
interpret the law.’’
Read more here:
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/12/27/2563312/clean-energy-group-to-challenge.html#storylink=cpy
1 Comment »
Leave a reply to Robert Searfoss Cancel reply
-
Archives
- December 2025 (286)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Same for people in the U.S. state of Georgia.
Only one Georgia public service commissioner voted against making citizens pay in advance for the “imaginary” nukes now sort of under construction.
The huge amounts of money now going to these two massive mistakes in the two southern states could have been spent on huge solar projects that would provide lots of power without any radioactive excrement and without playing nuclear roulette.
The radioactive excrement needs to be somehow “guarded” for a long time…at a cost. The staggering decommissioning costs of the plants…as much as construction…are kicked down the road to people in the future to pay.
What a pile of radioactive junk!
I like the challenge response theory of history where decisions to challenges and actions taken to challenges result in success or failure of the society.
I’m afraid that our big energy challenge and our response of nuclear is a massive mistake. Particularly when the numbers show that free sun energy can be harvested in ever-better ways without the horrible risks and killing long-term costs of nuclear are considered in a systematic way.