Legal Challenge as Australian Govt Sneaks in Nuclear Waste Dump Plan
The Senate is due tomorrow to debate the National Radioactive Waste Management Bill, which if passed will open the way for the government to build the dump on Muckaty station, 120 kilometres north of Tennant Creek.Ownership of nuclear waste site disputed.
the government’s secret and divisive process to build the dump on Muckaty would be strongly resisted in Tennant Creek as well as nationally and internationally.
Ownership of nuclear waste site disputed, Lindsay Murdoch in Tennant Creek, Sydney Morning Herald, May 9, 2011 DOCUMENTS unearthed in the National Archives challenge the Gillard government’s push to build a nuclear waste dump on disputed Aboriginal land near Tennant Creek, lawyers say.
Martin Hyde, a senior associate of the law firm Maurice Blackburn, says the discovery of documents showing that one Aboriginal family group does not exclusively own the land raises serious questions about the nomination of the site by the Northern Land Council.
”This is vital information for the case,” said Mr Hyde.
Traditional owners have begun a challenge to the nomination in the Federal Court.
Dave Sweeney, a nuclear campaigner for the Australian Conservation Foundation, who attended yesterday’s protest, said the government’s secret and divisive process to build the dump on Muckaty would be strongly resisted in Tennant Creek as well as nationally and internationally.
”There should be an independent and comprehensive assessment undertaken into how best to manage Australia’s nuclear waste,” Mr Sweeney said.
Despite opposition from the Greens, the bill appears certain to pass with Coalition support.
Mr Hyde said the unearthed documents showed the Muckaty site was not exclusively owned by Ms Lauder’s family, as claimed by the Northern Land Council.
He said they also reveal that the council’s own anthropological experts tendered evidence before the Aboriginal Land Commissioner showing that Muckaty was owned by three family sub-groups.
Mr Hyde said the legal challenge to the nomination will continue regardless of the passage of the legislation.
A West Australian Greens senator, Scott Ludlam, who was at Tennant Creek for the protest, said the government was trying to ram the bill through on budget day with minimum debate.
He said scientific experts had said the dump should not be built at a remote site far away from emergency services…..
1 Comment »
Leave a reply to Carrol Cancel reply
-
Archives
- December 2025 (293)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Australia shouldn’t have this dump at all, if so Canberra can have it!