UK govt urged to GENUINELY promote renewable energy through Feed-In tariffs
The government proposals are inspired by e.on and EDF to benefit nuclear power, which will crowd out renewable energy. This flies in the face of all independent opinion polls which show that the public wants its electricity payments to be reserved for renewable energy, not nuclear power.
Wrong policy on renewable energy The Guardian, Monday 27 December 2010 We urge support for real feed-in tariffs for renewable energy and not nuclear power. British policymakers are poised yet again to ignore the dominant and most effective mechanism for promoting renewable energy across the world (feed-in tariffs) in favour of an auction system (Huhne promises ‘seismic shift’ to greener power, 17 December). This will replace the renewables obligation. The obligation is expensive, but allows good opportunities for onshore and offshore wind developers to set up schemes. The auction approach is tried and tested across the world (including the UK in the 1990s) and shown to consistently fail to deliver large capacities of renewable energy.
We need a German-style system which offers open-ended opportunities to developers to take up contracts to supply renewable energy at good, guaranteed rates for 20 years, with rates tailored for different renewable technologies. Instead, in its electricity markets reform proposals, the government is proposing a thinly disguised design for channelling money from electricity consumer receipts away from renewable energy, especially wind power, and towards nuclear power. The government proposals are inspired by e.on and EDF to benefit nuclear power, which will crowd out renewable energy. This flies in the face of all independent opinion polls which show that the public wants its electricity payments to be reserved for renewable energy, not nuclear power.
Dr David Toke Senior Lecturer in Energy Policy, Department of Political
Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham
meritus professor David Elliott Professor of Technology, Faculty of Mathematics, Computing and Design, Open University
Professor Bryan Wynne, Professor of Science Studies, Lancaster University
Professor John Twidell, AMSET Centre Leicestershire
Professor Andrew Dobson, Professor of Politics, School of Politics, International Relations and the Environment, Keele University,
Professor Keith Barnham, Physics Department, Imperial College London
Dr Paul Dorfman, Warwick Business School University of Warwick
Colin Challen
Herbert Eppel
Dr Richard Cowell
Dr Peter Connor, University of Exeter
Dr Candida Spillard
Dr Ian Fairlie
Paul Brown
Antony Froggatt Senior Research Fellow, Chatham House
Dr Xavier Lemaire
Letters: Wrong policy on renewable energy | Environment | The Guardian
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment