Ionizing radiation and other problems with mammography
The first problem with mammograms is that they use
ionizing radiation at a relatively high dose, which in
and of itself can contribute to the development of
breast cancer. Mammograms expose your body to radiation
that can be 1,000 times greater than that from a chest
x-ray, which we know poses a cancer risk.
False Positives are Alarmingly Common
The second glaring problem with mammography is its unacceptably high rate of false positives. …
The Dangers of Mammography: Ionizing Radiation, blogtalkradio, Lea Yekutiel, 1 Nov 10, Dr. Mercola’s comments:Mammograms are often touted as a “life-saving” formof cancer screening, responsible for reducing breastcancer death rates by 15-25 percent. But this reportedbenefit is based on outdated studies done decades ago
The New England Journal of Medicine is one of the most
prestigious medical journals and it has now published
the first recent study to look at the effectiveness of
mammograms in years, and their findings are a far cry
from what most public health officials and physicians
would have you believe.The Dangers of Mammography: Ionizing Radiation
The first problem with mammograms is that they use
ionizing radiation at a relatively high dose, which in
and of itself can contribute to the development of
breast cancer. Mammograms expose your body to radiation
that can be 1,000 times greater than that from a chest
x-ray, which we know poses a cancer risk.
Mammography also compresses your breasts tightly, which
could lead to a dangerous spread of cancerous cells,
should they exist. Dr. Charles B. Simone, a former clinical
associate in immunology and pharmacology at the National
Cancer Institute, said:“Mammograms increase the risk for developing breast cancer
and raise the risk of spreading or metastasizing an
existing growth.”Dr. Samuel Epstein, one of the top cancer experts,
similarly stated:“The premenopausal breast is highly sensitive to radiation,
each 1 rad exposure increasing breast cancer risk by about
1 percent, with a cumulative 10 percent increased risk for
each breast over a decade’s screening.”False Positives are Alarmingly Common
The second glaring problem with mammography is its unacceptably high rate of false positives. …
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (223)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS




Leave a comment