Australia’s Northern Territory asks new Prime Minister to stop nuclear waste dump plan
Former Prime Minister John Howard planned to build the dump on Muckaty Station, in Central Australia, because the Northern Territory did not have the constitutional strength to block the move.
Hendo urges Gillard to dump Muckaty, Northern Territory News, NICK CALACOURAS June 26th, 2010 AUSTRALIA’S new Prime Minister Julia Gillard should rethink her predecessor’s decision to build a nuclear waste dump in the Northern Territory, Chief Minister Paul Henderson said.
Mr Henderson said the Muckaty Station nuclear waste dump would be one of the first issues on the table.
“Let’s open up this process again,” he said.
“Let’s have a science-based process, not a put up your hand and I’d like it here process that the Government is following at the moment.”
Mr Henderson said he hoped to talk to Ms Gillard this weekend……….
The nuclear waste dump has been the most significant point of disagreement between the Territory and Federal governments.
Former Prime Minister John Howard planned to build the dump on Muckaty Station, in Central Australia, because the Northern Territory did not have the constitutional strength to block the move.
The Northern Land Council nominated Muckaty under a $12 million deal.
But Kevin Rudd went to the 2007 election promising to choose a location based on “the science”.
Previous scientific surveys have pointed to Roxby Downs in South Australia as the most suitable location.
Mr Rudd promised to repeal the law that could force the dump on the NT.
But when the government finally repealed this legislation earlier this year, they replaced the law with the same provision – allowing the dump to be forced on the Territory.
Federal Resources Minister Martin Ferguson admitted the new law had the same application as the old one.
“In no way can we allow any state or Territory government to get in the way of establishing a repository,” he said.
Solomon MHR Damian Hale spoke out against his own government.
He accepted that Australia had an obligation to store its nuclear waste, but said the site should be chosen for scientific reasons, not because the NT was a constitutional “weak link”.
Mr Rudd promised to repeal the law that could force the dump on the NT.
But when the government finally repealed this legislation earlier this year, they replaced the law with the same provision – allowing the dump to be forced on the Territory.
Federal Resources Minister Martin Ferguson admitted the new law had the same application as the old one.
“In no way can we allow any state or Territory government to get in the way of establishing a repository,” he said.
Solomon MHR Damian Hale spoke out against his own government.
He accepted that Australia had an obligation to store its nuclear waste, but said the site should be chosen for scientific reasons, not because the NT was a constitutional “weak link”.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (236)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment