Murky history of nuclear waste dumping
Tennessee must stop dumping of nuclear waste here TENNESSEAN.COM November 6, 2009 Shifting a problem from one place to another, rather than solving it, never works. Yet, it keeps happening. Take, for example, a now-rejected plan by the U.S. Department of Energy to dump a large quantity of low-level radioactive soil from New York into a commercial landfill in Tennessee. Even though the shipment was later rerouted for Utah, Tennesseans should raise the red flag on this plan and others like it, despite government assurances that the practice is uniformly safe or that it is outside their jurisdiction.
Early last month, DOE announced plans to bring 6,000 cubic yards of soil containing cesium-137, strontium-90 and plutonium-239/240, excavated from a closed plutonium extraction plant in Niskayuna, N.Y., to the Chestnut Ridge Landfill, on the Knox-Anderson County line in East Tennessee. The soil, equivalent to 200 dump-truck loads, had remained at the New York site since that plant closed 56 years ago
A few days later, the DOE abruptly changed its mind and announced the dirt would be shipped to a licensed facility in Clive, Utah. It seems Knox and Anderson County officials’ concerns had played a part.Why was Tennessee DOE’s first choice? Because Tennessee has unwisely allowed itself to become a chief dumping ground for material from defunct nuclear weapons-related facilities through the euphemistically named Bulk Survey Release Program. A few years ago, it was touted as a success that World War II-era radioactive sites such as the federal Oak Ridge Reservation had been cleaned up.
What did not receive enough attention was where the radioactive waste went. In many cases, it was quietly moved to commercial landfills around Tennessee.
Just how much of a public-health hazard is the sort of material being removed from the New York site and others? DOE has not answered this question to anyone’s satisfaction. The levels of radiation vary, and the term “low level” is a broad umbrella. That lack of certainty, and the fact that many commercial landfills are near bodies of water that serve local populations, are reason enough for Tennesseans to demand change…………….
Tennessee must stop dumping of nuclear waste here | tennessean.com | The Tennessean
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (293)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment